Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179712 |
Resumo: | Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composites used for direct restorations of posterior teeth. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA statement. This review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016053436). A search of the scientific literature was performed by two independent reviewers using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from commencement until January 2018. The research question was “Do bulk-fill resin composites have a clinical performance comparable to conventional resin composites in posterior restorations?” Only studies evaluating class I and II direct restorations in permanent teeth with a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. The RevMan 5 program was used for meta-analysis, calculating the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the dichotomous outcome (restoration failure or success). Results: Ten articles were selected, comprising 941 analyzed restorations. The mean follow-up period was 33.6 months (12–72 months). No statistically significant differences in the failure rate were observed between conventional and base/flowable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.31; RR 1.49; 95% CI 0.69–3.25) or full-body/sculptable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.12; RR 1.89; 95% CI 0.84–4.24). Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicate similar clinical performances of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites over a follow-up period of 12 to 72 months. Clinical significance: Based on the results of this study, the bulk-fill resin composites could be an alternative for direct restorations in posterior teeth. However, clinical trials of longer duration are required. |
id |
UNSP_08cbfeeaf64f2e1ca0a949df55ca57e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179712 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysisBulk-fill resinDental restorationDirect restorationIncremental filling techniqueResin compositeSystematic reviewObjectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composites used for direct restorations of posterior teeth. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA statement. This review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016053436). A search of the scientific literature was performed by two independent reviewers using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from commencement until January 2018. The research question was “Do bulk-fill resin composites have a clinical performance comparable to conventional resin composites in posterior restorations?” Only studies evaluating class I and II direct restorations in permanent teeth with a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. The RevMan 5 program was used for meta-analysis, calculating the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the dichotomous outcome (restoration failure or success). Results: Ten articles were selected, comprising 941 analyzed restorations. The mean follow-up period was 33.6 months (12–72 months). No statistically significant differences in the failure rate were observed between conventional and base/flowable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.31; RR 1.49; 95% CI 0.69–3.25) or full-body/sculptable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.12; RR 1.89; 95% CI 0.84–4.24). Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicate similar clinical performances of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites over a follow-up period of 12 to 72 months. Clinical significance: Based on the results of this study, the bulk-fill resin composites could be an alternative for direct restorations in posterior teeth. However, clinical trials of longer duration are required.Dental School Universidade de Pernambuco/FOP-UPE, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650; TabatingaAraçatuba Dental School UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, R. José Bonifácio, 1193; Vila MendoncaAraçatuba Dental School UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, R. José Bonifácio, 1193; Vila MendoncaUniversidade de Pernambuco/FOP-UPEUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Veloso, Sirley Raiane MamedeLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP]de Moraes, Sandra Lúcia DantasDo Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro CavalcantiPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz2018-12-11T17:36:27Z2018-12-11T17:36:27Z2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-13application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7Clinical Oral Investigations, p. 1-13.1436-37711432-6981http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17971210.1007/s00784-018-2429-72-s2.0-850444610162-s2.0-85044461016.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Oral Investigations0,9860,986info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-11T06:16:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179712Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:25:19.954436Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis Veloso, Sirley Raiane Mamede Bulk-fill resin Dental restoration Direct restoration Incremental filling technique Resin composite Systematic review |
title_short |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Veloso, Sirley Raiane Mamede |
author_facet |
Veloso, Sirley Raiane Mamede Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP] de Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP] de Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Pernambuco/FOP-UPE Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veloso, Sirley Raiane Mamede Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP] de Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bulk-fill resin Dental restoration Direct restoration Incremental filling technique Resin composite Systematic review |
topic |
Bulk-fill resin Dental restoration Direct restoration Incremental filling technique Resin composite Systematic review |
description |
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composites used for direct restorations of posterior teeth. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA statement. This review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016053436). A search of the scientific literature was performed by two independent reviewers using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from commencement until January 2018. The research question was “Do bulk-fill resin composites have a clinical performance comparable to conventional resin composites in posterior restorations?” Only studies evaluating class I and II direct restorations in permanent teeth with a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. The RevMan 5 program was used for meta-analysis, calculating the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the dichotomous outcome (restoration failure or success). Results: Ten articles were selected, comprising 941 analyzed restorations. The mean follow-up period was 33.6 months (12–72 months). No statistically significant differences in the failure rate were observed between conventional and base/flowable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.31; RR 1.49; 95% CI 0.69–3.25) or full-body/sculptable bulk-fill resin composites (p = 0.12; RR 1.89; 95% CI 0.84–4.24). Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicate similar clinical performances of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites over a follow-up period of 12 to 72 months. Clinical significance: Based on the results of this study, the bulk-fill resin composites could be an alternative for direct restorations in posterior teeth. However, clinical trials of longer duration are required. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:36:27Z 2018-12-11T17:36:27Z 2018-03-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 Clinical Oral Investigations, p. 1-13. 1436-3771 1432-6981 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179712 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 2-s2.0-85044461016 2-s2.0-85044461016.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179712 |
identifier_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations, p. 1-13. 1436-3771 1432-6981 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 2-s2.0-85044461016 2-s2.0-85044461016.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations 0,986 0,986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-13 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128808034762752 |