Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Floriano, Idevaldo, Silvinato, Antonio, Bacha, Hélio A., Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP], Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP], Bernardo, Wanderley M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232
Resumo: Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
id UNSP_097b49a0ab2c786226e512a01dd20730
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240232
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysisAnticoagulantsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.Divisão de Pneumologia Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPMedicina Baseada em Evidências Associação Médica Brasileira, SPMedicina Baseada em Evidências Cooperativa Baixa Mogiana, SPHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SPDepartamento de Infectologia Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo, SPDivisão de Pneumologia Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPDepartamento de Infectologia Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Associação Médica BrasileiraCooperativa Baixa MogianaHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]Floriano, IdevaldoSilvinato, AntonioBacha, Hélio A.Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP]Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP]Bernardo, Wanderley M.2023-03-01T20:07:28Z2023-03-01T20:07:28Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022.1806-37561806-3713http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24023210.36416/1806-3756/e202200412-s2.0-85131771734Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJornal Brasileiro de Pneumologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:07:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240232Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:08:27.281856Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]
Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
title_short Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
author Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]
author_facet Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]
Floriano, Idevaldo
Silvinato, Antonio
Bacha, Hélio A.
Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP]
Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP]
Bernardo, Wanderley M.
author_role author
author2 Floriano, Idevaldo
Silvinato, Antonio
Bacha, Hélio A.
Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP]
Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP]
Bernardo, Wanderley M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Associação Médica Brasileira
Cooperativa Baixa Mogiana
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]
Floriano, Idevaldo
Silvinato, Antonio
Bacha, Hélio A.
Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP]
Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP]
Bernardo, Wanderley M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
topic Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
description Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T20:07:28Z
2023-03-01T20:07:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022.
1806-3756
1806-3713
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232
10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
2-s2.0-85131771734
url http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232
identifier_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022.
1806-3756
1806-3713
10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
2-s2.0-85131771734
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129493598994432