Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232 |
Resumo: | Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. |
id |
UNSP_097b49a0ab2c786226e512a01dd20730 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240232 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysisAnticoagulantsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.Divisão de Pneumologia Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPMedicina Baseada em Evidências Associação Médica Brasileira, SPMedicina Baseada em Evidências Cooperativa Baixa Mogiana, SPHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SPDepartamento de Infectologia Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo, SPDivisão de Pneumologia Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPDepartamento de Infectologia Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Associação Médica BrasileiraCooperativa Baixa MogianaHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Batista, Diane R. [UNESP]Floriano, IdevaldoSilvinato, AntonioBacha, Hélio A.Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP]Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP]Bernardo, Wanderley M.2023-03-01T20:07:28Z2023-03-01T20:07:28Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022.1806-37561806-3713http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24023210.36416/1806-3756/e202200412-s2.0-85131771734Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJornal Brasileiro de Pneumologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:07:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240232Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:08:27.281856Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis Batista, Diane R. [UNESP] Anticoagulants COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Batista, Diane R. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Batista, Diane R. [UNESP] Floriano, Idevaldo Silvinato, Antonio Bacha, Hélio A. Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP] Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP] Bernardo, Wanderley M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Floriano, Idevaldo Silvinato, Antonio Bacha, Hélio A. Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP] Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP] Bernardo, Wanderley M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Associação Médica Brasileira Cooperativa Baixa Mogiana Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Batista, Diane R. [UNESP] Floriano, Idevaldo Silvinato, Antonio Bacha, Hélio A. Barbosa, Alexandre N. [UNESP] Tanni, Suzana E. [UNESP] Bernardo, Wanderley M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anticoagulants COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 |
topic |
Anticoagulants COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 |
description |
Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate-and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 2023-03-01T20:07:28Z 2023-03-01T20:07:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041 Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022. 1806-3756 1806-3713 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041 2-s2.0-85131771734 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240232 |
identifier_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 48, n. 4, 2022. 1806-3756 1806-3713 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041 2-s2.0-85131771734 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129493598994432 |