Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prakki, A.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Cilli, R., Saad, JOC, Rodrigues, JR
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635
Resumo: Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices.
id UNSP_0aeaea5699afc69a64a16b06cc10a053
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194635
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorationsClass II cavity clinical triallong-term studyproximal contactresin compositerestorative techniqueObjective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices.Sao Paulo State Univ, Bauru Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Bauru Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilQuintessence Publ Co IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Prakki, A.Cilli, R.Saad, JOCRodrigues, JR2020-12-10T16:32:43Z2020-12-10T16:32:43Z2004-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article785-789Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004.0033-6572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635WOS:000225359900003Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengQuintessence Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:10:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194635Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:42:23.518386Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
title Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
spellingShingle Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
Prakki, A.
Class II cavity clinical trial
long-term study
proximal contact
resin composite
restorative technique
title_short Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
title_full Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
title_sort Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
author Prakki, A.
author_facet Prakki, A.
Cilli, R.
Saad, JOC
Rodrigues, JR
author_role author
author2 Cilli, R.
Saad, JOC
Rodrigues, JR
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prakki, A.
Cilli, R.
Saad, JOC
Rodrigues, JR
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Class II cavity clinical trial
long-term study
proximal contact
resin composite
restorative technique
topic Class II cavity clinical trial
long-term study
proximal contact
resin composite
restorative technique
description Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-11-01
2020-12-10T16:32:43Z
2020-12-10T16:32:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004.
0033-6572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635
WOS:000225359900003
identifier_str_mv Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004.
0033-6572
WOS:000225359900003
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Quintessence International
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 785-789
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Quintessence Publ Co Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Quintessence Publ Co Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129349159747584