Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices. |
id |
UNSP_0aeaea5699afc69a64a16b06cc10a053 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194635 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorationsClass II cavity clinical triallong-term studyproximal contactresin compositerestorative techniqueObjective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices.Sao Paulo State Univ, Bauru Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Bauru Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilQuintessence Publ Co IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Prakki, A.Cilli, R.Saad, JOCRodrigues, JR2020-12-10T16:32:43Z2020-12-10T16:32:43Z2004-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article785-789Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004.0033-6572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635WOS:000225359900003Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengQuintessence Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:10:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194635Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:42:23.518386Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
title |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
spellingShingle |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations Prakki, A. Class II cavity clinical trial long-term study proximal contact resin composite restorative technique |
title_short |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
title_full |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
title_fullStr |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
title_sort |
Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations |
author |
Prakki, A. |
author_facet |
Prakki, A. Cilli, R. Saad, JOC Rodrigues, JR |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cilli, R. Saad, JOC Rodrigues, JR |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prakki, A. Cilli, R. Saad, JOC Rodrigues, JR |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Class II cavity clinical trial long-term study proximal contact resin composite restorative technique |
topic |
Class II cavity clinical trial long-term study proximal contact resin composite restorative technique |
description |
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-11-01 2020-12-10T16:32:43Z 2020-12-10T16:32:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004. 0033-6572 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635 WOS:000225359900003 |
identifier_str_mv |
Quintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004. 0033-6572 WOS:000225359900003 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194635 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence International |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
785-789 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence Publ Co Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence Publ Co Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129349159747584 |