Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867 |
Resumo: | Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals. |
id |
UNSP_0bc92ff96b47cfe5aa9d4240f006af1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232867 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areasAbstractCommunication scienceInformation scienceJournals guidelinesTitleObjective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversity of ZaragozaPolytechnic Institute of Porto CIC. Digital - PortoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of ZaragozaCIC. Digital - PortoFujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-CarmenTerra, Ana Lúcia2022-04-30T17:10:30Z2022-04-30T17:10:30Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article76-79http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018.0258-3127http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23286710.20316/ESE.2018.44.180152-s2.0-85062954071Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Science Editinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-30T17:10:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232867Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:14:01.395556Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
title |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
spellingShingle |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP] Abstract Communication science Information science Journals guidelines Title |
title_short |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
title_full |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
title_fullStr |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
title_sort |
Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas |
author |
Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP] Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen Terra, Ana Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen Terra, Ana Lúcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) University of Zaragoza CIC. Digital - Porto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP] Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen Terra, Ana Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abstract Communication science Information science Journals guidelines Title |
topic |
Abstract Communication science Information science Journals guidelines Title |
description |
Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 2022-04-30T17:10:30Z 2022-04-30T17:10:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015 European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018. 0258-3127 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867 10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015 2-s2.0-85062954071 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018. 0258-3127 10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015 2-s2.0-85062954071 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Science Editing |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
76-79 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128484395974656 |