Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen, Terra, Ana Lúcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867
Resumo: Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals.
id UNSP_0bc92ff96b47cfe5aa9d4240f006af1a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232867
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areasAbstractCommunication scienceInformation scienceJournals guidelinesTitleObjective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversity of ZaragozaPolytechnic Institute of Porto CIC. Digital - PortoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of ZaragozaCIC. Digital - PortoFujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-CarmenTerra, Ana Lúcia2022-04-30T17:10:30Z2022-04-30T17:10:30Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article76-79http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018.0258-3127http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23286710.20316/ESE.2018.44.180152-s2.0-85062954071Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Science Editinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-30T17:10:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232867Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:14:01.395556Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
title Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
spellingShingle Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]
Abstract
Communication science
Information science
Journals guidelines
Title
title_short Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
title_full Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
title_fullStr Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
title_full_unstemmed Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
title_sort Journals’ guidelines about title, abstract and keywords: An overview of information science and communication science areas
author Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]
author_facet Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]
Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen
Terra, Ana Lúcia
author_role author
author2 Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen
Terra, Ana Lúcia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Zaragoza
CIC. Digital - Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes [UNESP]
Agustín-Lacruz, María-Del-Carmen
Terra, Ana Lúcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abstract
Communication science
Information science
Journals guidelines
Title
topic Abstract
Communication science
Information science
Journals guidelines
Title
description Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to observe and analyse guidelines for authors on writing their papers’ title, abstract and keywords. Methods: The sample consisted of 64 journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): 32 (50%) Library & Information Science (LIS) journals and 32 (50%) Communication Science (CS) journals. A spreadsheet was used for data collection, containing 36 items grouped into four categories: identification data, guidelines for the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the scientific article. Then, in each category, the LIS journals were compared with CS journals, to verify how specific aspects of knowledge organisation and representation are reflected in editorial policies. Results: Majority of CS journals (27, 84%) and less than a quarter of LIS journals (7, 22%) referred to a style guide on their website. Specific guidelines for the title were presented in 17 (53%) LIS journals and in 23 (72%) of CS journals, mainly concerning the word number. Twenty three (72%) LIS journals and 31 (97%) CS journals included guidelines for writing abstracts, focusing on word number and the structure of abstracts. Instructions for keywords were presented in 21 (66%) LIS journals and 28 (88%) CS journals, defining the number of keywords and the use of controlled vocabulary. Conclusion: There is a tendency to standardise general indications and criteria about titles, abstracts and keywords. Guidelines on writing abstracts, titles and keywords have smaller presence in editorial policies of LIS journals, than of CS journals.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
2022-04-30T17:10:30Z
2022-04-30T17:10:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015
European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018.
0258-3127
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867
10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015
2-s2.0-85062954071
url http://dx.doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232867
identifier_str_mv European Science Editing, v. 44, n. 4, p. 76-79, 2018.
0258-3127
10.20316/ESE.2018.44.18015
2-s2.0-85062954071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Science Editing
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 76-79
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128484395974656