Bond strength of adhesive systems to human tooth enamel

• Autor(a) principal: Paradella, Thaís Cachuté [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Outros Autores: Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000100001; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69480
• topic: Dental enamel; Dentin-bonding agents; Shear strength; acetone; acrylic acid resin; Clearfil SE Bond; dentin bonding agent; methacrylic acid derivative; One Up Bond F; One-Up-Bond F; polymethacrylic acid derivative; prime and bond 2.1; resin; resin cement; unclassified drug; adhesion; adolescent; analysis of variance; chemistry; chi square distribution; clinical trial; controlled clinical trial; controlled study; dental bonding; drug effect; enamel; human; materials testing; premolar tooth; randomized controlled trial; shear strength; standard; Acetone; Acrylic Resins; Adhesiveness; Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Bicuspid; Chi-Square Distribution; Composite Resins; Dental Bonding; Dental Enamel; Dentin-Bonding Agents; Humans; Materials Testing; Methacrylates; Polymethacrylic Acids; Resin Cements; Shear Strength

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro three adhesive systems: a total etching single-component system (G1 Prime & Bond 2.1), a self-etching primer (G2 Clearfil SE Bond), and a self-etching adhesive (G3 One Up Bond F), through shear bond strength to enamel of human teeth, evaluating the type of fracture through stereomicroscopy, following the ISO guidance on adhesive testing. Thirty sound premolars were bisected mesiodistally and the buccal and lingual surfaces were embedded in acrylic resin, polished up to 600-grit sandpapers, and randomly assigned to three experimental groups (n = 20). Composite resin cylinders were added to the tested surfaces. The specimens were kept in distilled water (37°C/24 h), thermocycled for 500 cycles (5°C-55°C) and submitted to shear testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The type of fracture was analyzed under stereomicroscopy and the data were submitted to Anova, Tukey and Chi-squared (5%) statistical analyses. The mean adhesive strengths were G1: 18.13 ± 6.49 MPa, (55% of resin cohesive fractures); G2: 17.12 ± 5.80 MPa (90% of adhesive fractures); and G3: 10.47 ± 3.14 MPa (85% of adhesive fractures). In terms of bond strength, there were no significant differences between G1 and G2, and G3 was significantly different from the other groups. G1 presented a different type of fracture from that of G2 and G3. In conclusion, although the total etching and self-etching systems presented similar shear bond strength values, the types of fracture presented by them were different, which can have clinical implications.