Tensile bond strength of self-etching versus total-etching adhesive systems under different dentinal substrate conditions

• Autor(a) principal: Susin, Alexandre Henrique
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Outros Autores: Vasconcellos, Walison Arthuso, Cury Saad, José Roberto [UNESP], Oliveira Junior, Osmir Batista de [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000100014; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69484
• topic: Dentin permeability; Dentin-bonding agents; Tensile strength; Clearfil SE Bond; dentin bonding agent; fibrillar collagen; methacrylic acid derivative; One Up Bond F; One-Up-Bond F; resin cement; unclassified drug; adhesion; analysis of variance; chemistry; dental acid etching; dental bonding; dental etching; dentin; drug effect; human; materials testing; methodology; molar tooth; standard; tensile strength; tooth permeability; Acid Etching, Dental; Adhesiveness; Analysis of Variance; Dental Bonding; Dental Etching; Dentin; Dentin Permeability; Dentin-Bonding Agents; Fibrillar Collagens; Humans; Materials Testing; Methacrylates; Molar, Third; Resin Cements; Tensile Strength

The use of acid etchants to produce surface demineralization and collagen network exposure, allowing adhesive monomers interdiffusion and consequently the formation of a hybrid layer, has been considered the most efficient mechanism of dentin bonding. The aim of this study was to compare the tensile bond strength to dentin of three adhesive systems, two self-etching ones (Clearfil SE Bond - CSEB and One Up Bond F - OUBF) and one total-etching one (Single Bond - SB), under three dentinal substrate conditions (wet, dry and re-wet). Ninety human, freshly extracted third molars were sectioned at the occlusal surface to remove enamel and to form a flat dentin wall. The specimens were restored with composite resin (Filtek Z250) and submitted to tensile bond strength testing (TBS) in an MTS 810. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p = 0.05). Wet dentin presented the highest TBS values for SB and CSEB. Dry dentin and re-wet produced significantly lower TBS values when using SB. OUBF was not affected by the different conditions of the dentin substrate, producing similar TBS values regardless of the surface pretreatments.