Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: De Moraes, Mercedes [UNESP], Gomes Neto, José Anchieta [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231725
Resumo: A comparative study is reported between C18 bonded silica gel and powdered polyethylene (PE) as sorbent for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination using ammonium diethyldithiophosphate (ADTP) as the complexing agent in a flow injection system. The complexes were formed in 0.14 mol L-1 HNO 3 and processed in a simple flow system comprising a peristaltic pump, a manual injector-commutator, and a sorbent-packed mini-column. Ethanol was selected as the eluent and analytes in the eluate were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimum concentration of the complexing agent was 0.1% (m/v) ADTP for Cu and Pb determination using either C 18 or PE, and 0.25% (m/v) ADTP for Cd determination using PE. The sample loading flow rates were 5.0, 3.6, and 3.0 mL min-1 for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The best elution flow rate was 6.5 mL min-1 For a 60-sec preconcentration time, the sampling rate was 40 h-1 and the enrichment factors of 33, 36, and 11 times (C18) or 18, 22, and 23 times (PE) were obtained for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The limits of detection (LOD) were 1.6 μg L-1 Cu, 11 μg L-1 Pb, and 2.0 μg L-1 Cd using C18 or 2.9 μg L -1 Cu, 19 μg L-1 Pb, and 1.0 μg L-1 Cd using PE, respectively. The relative standard deviations (n = 12) were typically <2%, <2%, and <6% for Cd, Cu, and Pb, respectively. The recoveries of Cd, Cu, and Pb added to wine samples varied from 96-99%, 97-102%, and 90-99%, respectively, using C18 or PE. Accuracy was checked for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination in six wine samples digested by block digestor and open-vessel microwave-assisted digestion systems. The results revealed that C18 was more efficient for Cu and Pb determination, while PE was the best sorbent for Cd.
id UNSP_10a282a341ed8ba72b2c461decbe3b34
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231725
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase ExtractionA comparative study is reported between C18 bonded silica gel and powdered polyethylene (PE) as sorbent for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination using ammonium diethyldithiophosphate (ADTP) as the complexing agent in a flow injection system. The complexes were formed in 0.14 mol L-1 HNO 3 and processed in a simple flow system comprising a peristaltic pump, a manual injector-commutator, and a sorbent-packed mini-column. Ethanol was selected as the eluent and analytes in the eluate were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimum concentration of the complexing agent was 0.1% (m/v) ADTP for Cu and Pb determination using either C 18 or PE, and 0.25% (m/v) ADTP for Cd determination using PE. The sample loading flow rates were 5.0, 3.6, and 3.0 mL min-1 for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The best elution flow rate was 6.5 mL min-1 For a 60-sec preconcentration time, the sampling rate was 40 h-1 and the enrichment factors of 33, 36, and 11 times (C18) or 18, 22, and 23 times (PE) were obtained for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The limits of detection (LOD) were 1.6 μg L-1 Cu, 11 μg L-1 Pb, and 2.0 μg L-1 Cd using C18 or 2.9 μg L -1 Cu, 19 μg L-1 Pb, and 1.0 μg L-1 Cd using PE, respectively. The relative standard deviations (n = 12) were typically <2%, <2%, and <6% for Cd, Cu, and Pb, respectively. The recoveries of Cd, Cu, and Pb added to wine samples varied from 96-99%, 97-102%, and 90-99%, respectively, using C18 or PE. Accuracy was checked for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination in six wine samples digested by block digestor and open-vessel microwave-assisted digestion systems. The results revealed that C18 was more efficient for Cu and Pb determination, while PE was the best sorbent for Cd.Instituto de Química Universidade Estadual Paulista, P.O. Box 355, 14801-970 Araraquara-SPInstituto de Química Universidade Estadual Paulista, P.O. Box 355, 14801-970 Araraquara-SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]De Moraes, Mercedes [UNESP]Gomes Neto, José Anchieta [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:47:14Z2022-04-29T08:47:14Z2003-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article179-184Atomic Spectroscopy, v. 24, n. 5, p. 179-184, 2003.0195-5373http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2317252-s2.0-0345688086Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAtomic Spectroscopyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:47:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231725Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-29T08:47:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
title Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
spellingShingle Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]
title_short Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
title_full Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
title_fullStr Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
title_full_unstemmed Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
title_sort Flow Injection AAS Determination of Cd, Cu, and Pb at Trace Levels in Wine Using Solid Phase Extraction
author Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]
author_facet Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]
De Moraes, Mercedes [UNESP]
Gomes Neto, José Anchieta [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 De Moraes, Mercedes [UNESP]
Gomes Neto, José Anchieta [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires Fernandes, Andréa [UNESP]
De Moraes, Mercedes [UNESP]
Gomes Neto, José Anchieta [UNESP]
description A comparative study is reported between C18 bonded silica gel and powdered polyethylene (PE) as sorbent for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination using ammonium diethyldithiophosphate (ADTP) as the complexing agent in a flow injection system. The complexes were formed in 0.14 mol L-1 HNO 3 and processed in a simple flow system comprising a peristaltic pump, a manual injector-commutator, and a sorbent-packed mini-column. Ethanol was selected as the eluent and analytes in the eluate were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimum concentration of the complexing agent was 0.1% (m/v) ADTP for Cu and Pb determination using either C 18 or PE, and 0.25% (m/v) ADTP for Cd determination using PE. The sample loading flow rates were 5.0, 3.6, and 3.0 mL min-1 for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The best elution flow rate was 6.5 mL min-1 For a 60-sec preconcentration time, the sampling rate was 40 h-1 and the enrichment factors of 33, 36, and 11 times (C18) or 18, 22, and 23 times (PE) were obtained for Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively. The limits of detection (LOD) were 1.6 μg L-1 Cu, 11 μg L-1 Pb, and 2.0 μg L-1 Cd using C18 or 2.9 μg L -1 Cu, 19 μg L-1 Pb, and 1.0 μg L-1 Cd using PE, respectively. The relative standard deviations (n = 12) were typically <2%, <2%, and <6% for Cd, Cu, and Pb, respectively. The recoveries of Cd, Cu, and Pb added to wine samples varied from 96-99%, 97-102%, and 90-99%, respectively, using C18 or PE. Accuracy was checked for Cd, Cu, and Pb determination in six wine samples digested by block digestor and open-vessel microwave-assisted digestion systems. The results revealed that C18 was more efficient for Cu and Pb determination, while PE was the best sorbent for Cd.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-09-01
2022-04-29T08:47:14Z
2022-04-29T08:47:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Atomic Spectroscopy, v. 24, n. 5, p. 179-184, 2003.
0195-5373
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231725
2-s2.0-0345688086
identifier_str_mv Atomic Spectroscopy, v. 24, n. 5, p. 179-184, 2003.
0195-5373
2-s2.0-0345688086
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231725
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Atomic Spectroscopy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 179-184
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047006937022464