Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Macedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP], Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP], Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa [UNESP], Alves de Matos, Ana Karollyna [UNESP], Castro, Edicarlos Batista de [UNESP], Burgos, Nilda Roma
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.70
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210227
Resumo: More than 80% of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Brazil is cultivated in no-till systems, and although cover crops benefit the soil, they may reduce the amount of residual herbicides reaching the soil, thereby decreasing herbicide efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone applied alone, sequentially after glyphosate, and in a tank mixture with glyphosate before planting no-till soybean. Experiments were performed in two cover crop systems: (1) pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and (2) forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor]. The treatments tested were: glyphosate (720 g ae ha(-1)) at 20 d before sowing (DBS) followed by sulfentrazone (600 g ai ha(-1)) at 10 DBS; glyphosate + sulfentrazone (720 g ae ha(-1) + 600 g ai ha(-1)) for cover crop desiccation at 10 DBS; and sulfentrazone alone at 10 DBS without a cover crop. The accumulation of straw was 31% greater using sorghum rather than pearl millet. In the sorghum system, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 0 to 10 cm was 57% less with sequential application and 92% less with the tank mixture compared with the treatment without cover crop straw at 1 d after application (DAA). The same occurred in the pearl millet system, where the reduction was 33% and 80% for the sequential application and tank mixture, respectively. The absence of a cover crop resulted in greater sulfentrazone concentrations in the top layer of the soil when compared with the sequential application or tank mixture. At 31 and 53 DAA, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 10 to 20 and 20 to 40 cm did not differ among treatments. Precipitation of 90 mm was enough to remove the herbicide from the cover crop straw at 31 DAA when using sequential application. An additional 90-mm precipitation was necessary to promote the same result when using the tank mixture.
id UNSP_136b777164f00f5597558c3e1fd51782
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210227
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean plantingDystrophic Red Nitosolglyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]leachingpearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L) RBrown)sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench sspbicolor]sorptionMore than 80% of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Brazil is cultivated in no-till systems, and although cover crops benefit the soil, they may reduce the amount of residual herbicides reaching the soil, thereby decreasing herbicide efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone applied alone, sequentially after glyphosate, and in a tank mixture with glyphosate before planting no-till soybean. Experiments were performed in two cover crop systems: (1) pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and (2) forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor]. The treatments tested were: glyphosate (720 g ae ha(-1)) at 20 d before sowing (DBS) followed by sulfentrazone (600 g ai ha(-1)) at 10 DBS; glyphosate + sulfentrazone (720 g ae ha(-1) + 600 g ai ha(-1)) for cover crop desiccation at 10 DBS; and sulfentrazone alone at 10 DBS without a cover crop. The accumulation of straw was 31% greater using sorghum rather than pearl millet. In the sorghum system, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 0 to 10 cm was 57% less with sequential application and 92% less with the tank mixture compared with the treatment without cover crop straw at 1 d after application (DAA). The same occurred in the pearl millet system, where the reduction was 33% and 80% for the sequential application and tank mixture, respectively. The absence of a cover crop resulted in greater sulfentrazone concentrations in the top layer of the soil when compared with the sequential application or tank mixture. At 31 and 53 DAA, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 10 to 20 and 20 to 40 cm did not differ among treatments. Precipitation of 90 mm was enough to remove the herbicide from the cover crop straw at 31 DAA when using sequential application. An additional 90-mm precipitation was necessary to promote the same result when using the tank mixture.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Plant Protect, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Plant Prod & Breeding, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Arkansas, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USASao Paulo State Univ, Dept Plant Protect, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Plant Prod & Breeding, Botucatu, SP, BrazilCambridge Univ PressUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ ArkansasMacedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa [UNESP]Alves de Matos, Ana Karollyna [UNESP]Castro, Edicarlos Batista de [UNESP]Burgos, Nilda Roma2021-06-25T15:02:03Z2021-06-25T15:02:03Z2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article673-680http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.70Weed Science. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 68, n. 6, p. 673-680, 2020.0043-1745http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21022710.1017/wsc.2020.70WOS:000639434300014Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengWeed Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:58:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210227Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:32:41.645224Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
title Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
spellingShingle Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
Macedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]
Dystrophic Red Nitosol
glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]
leaching
pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L
) R
Brown)
sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L
) Moench ssp
bicolor]
sorption
title_short Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
title_full Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
title_fullStr Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
title_full_unstemmed Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
title_sort Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting
author Macedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]
author_facet Macedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa [UNESP]
Alves de Matos, Ana Karollyna [UNESP]
Castro, Edicarlos Batista de [UNESP]
Burgos, Nilda Roma
author_role author
author2 Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa [UNESP]
Alves de Matos, Ana Karollyna [UNESP]
Castro, Edicarlos Batista de [UNESP]
Burgos, Nilda Roma
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Univ Arkansas
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Macedo, Gabrielle de Castro [UNESP]
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa [UNESP]
Alves de Matos, Ana Karollyna [UNESP]
Castro, Edicarlos Batista de [UNESP]
Burgos, Nilda Roma
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dystrophic Red Nitosol
glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]
leaching
pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L
) R
Brown)
sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L
) Moench ssp
bicolor]
sorption
topic Dystrophic Red Nitosol
glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]
leaching
pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L
) R
Brown)
sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L
) Moench ssp
bicolor]
sorption
description More than 80% of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Brazil is cultivated in no-till systems, and although cover crops benefit the soil, they may reduce the amount of residual herbicides reaching the soil, thereby decreasing herbicide efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone applied alone, sequentially after glyphosate, and in a tank mixture with glyphosate before planting no-till soybean. Experiments were performed in two cover crop systems: (1) pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and (2) forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor]. The treatments tested were: glyphosate (720 g ae ha(-1)) at 20 d before sowing (DBS) followed by sulfentrazone (600 g ai ha(-1)) at 10 DBS; glyphosate + sulfentrazone (720 g ae ha(-1) + 600 g ai ha(-1)) for cover crop desiccation at 10 DBS; and sulfentrazone alone at 10 DBS without a cover crop. The accumulation of straw was 31% greater using sorghum rather than pearl millet. In the sorghum system, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 0 to 10 cm was 57% less with sequential application and 92% less with the tank mixture compared with the treatment without cover crop straw at 1 d after application (DAA). The same occurred in the pearl millet system, where the reduction was 33% and 80% for the sequential application and tank mixture, respectively. The absence of a cover crop resulted in greater sulfentrazone concentrations in the top layer of the soil when compared with the sequential application or tank mixture. At 31 and 53 DAA, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 10 to 20 and 20 to 40 cm did not differ among treatments. Precipitation of 90 mm was enough to remove the herbicide from the cover crop straw at 31 DAA when using sequential application. An additional 90-mm precipitation was necessary to promote the same result when using the tank mixture.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-01
2021-06-25T15:02:03Z
2021-06-25T15:02:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.70
Weed Science. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 68, n. 6, p. 673-680, 2020.
0043-1745
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210227
10.1017/wsc.2020.70
WOS:000639434300014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.70
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210227
identifier_str_mv Weed Science. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 68, n. 6, p. 673-680, 2020.
0043-1745
10.1017/wsc.2020.70
WOS:000639434300014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Weed Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 673-680
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge Univ Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge Univ Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129216890273792