Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Agnolon, Isabela Cabeca, Lopes, Louyse Gabrielli, Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP], Souza Chagas, Ana Carolina de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184168
Resumo: Reproductive parameters of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus are often evaluated. They are good indicators of resistance to commercial acaricides and of plant extracts' efficacy. The objective of this study was to compare the techniques: visual estimation and quantification by sampling used in the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) to calculate the hatching rate of eggs. Engorged females collected from cattle were subjected to the AIT with plant extracts and kept in an incubator for oviposition. The egg hatching was evaluated in 210 syringes by visual estimation (%). Then, eggs and larvae were counted into samples of 100 individuals, in three repetitions by stereo microscope. Significant differences were found between the two tests (p <= 0.05). The egg hatching average of visual estimation was higher than the quantification by sampling, 56.8-48.0, respectively (correlation = 0.85). We found that the visual assessment leads to a higher estimate of larvae in relation to eggs, because the infertile eggs can be concealed in the center of the syringe. In quantification by sampling, no statistical differences (p = 0.99) were observed in the pairwise counts between the three samples (48.1 +/- 26.6%, 47.8 +/- 26.9%, 48.1 +/- 26.5%) (correlation of repetitions = 0.96). This suggests that counting one sample is sufficient and the result should not differ much, regardless of the evaluator. Regarding the cutoff point of tick resistance status (95%), both methods are reliable. This study contributes to improvement of the AIT and can stimulate researchers to choose more accurate techniques for the assessment of egg hatching.
id UNSP_137fb4fc2f3c54116f3e29bd28199830
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184168
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggsCattle tickMethods of larvae estimationVisual estimationQuantification by samplingAdult immersion test (AIT)Reproductive parameters of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus are often evaluated. They are good indicators of resistance to commercial acaricides and of plant extracts' efficacy. The objective of this study was to compare the techniques: visual estimation and quantification by sampling used in the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) to calculate the hatching rate of eggs. Engorged females collected from cattle were subjected to the AIT with plant extracts and kept in an incubator for oviposition. The egg hatching was evaluated in 210 syringes by visual estimation (%). Then, eggs and larvae were counted into samples of 100 individuals, in three repetitions by stereo microscope. Significant differences were found between the two tests (p <= 0.05). The egg hatching average of visual estimation was higher than the quantification by sampling, 56.8-48.0, respectively (correlation = 0.85). We found that the visual assessment leads to a higher estimate of larvae in relation to eggs, because the infertile eggs can be concealed in the center of the syringe. In quantification by sampling, no statistical differences (p = 0.99) were observed in the pairwise counts between the three samples (48.1 +/- 26.6%, 47.8 +/- 26.9%, 48.1 +/- 26.5%) (correlation of repetitions = 0.96). This suggests that counting one sample is sufficient and the result should not differ much, regardless of the evaluator. Regarding the cutoff point of tick resistance status (95%), both methods are reliable. This study contributes to improvement of the AIT and can stimulate researchers to choose more accurate techniques for the assessment of egg hatching.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa)Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilCtr Univ Cent Paulista, Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilEmbrapa Pecuaria Sudeste, Rod Washington Luiz,Km 234,Caixa Postal 339, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa): 02.13.01.001.00-00Elsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ctr Univ Cent PaulistaEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]Agnolon, Isabela CabecaLopes, Louyse GabrielliGiglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]Souza Chagas, Ana Carolina de2019-10-04T11:55:34Z2019-10-04T11:55:34Z2018-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-38http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 264, p. 35-38, 2018.0304-4017http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18416810.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015WOS:000453621400005Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengVeterinary Parasitologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:03:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184168Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T19:03:47Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
title Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
spellingShingle Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]
Cattle tick
Methods of larvae estimation
Visual estimation
Quantification by sampling
Adult immersion test (AIT)
title_short Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
title_full Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
title_fullStr Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
title_sort Comparative study of hatching estimation methods of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus eggs
author Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]
author_facet Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]
Agnolon, Isabela Cabeca
Lopes, Louyse Gabrielli
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
Souza Chagas, Ana Carolina de
author_role author
author2 Agnolon, Isabela Cabeca
Lopes, Louyse Gabrielli
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
Souza Chagas, Ana Carolina de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Ctr Univ Cent Paulista
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, Amanda [UNESP]
Agnolon, Isabela Cabeca
Lopes, Louyse Gabrielli
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
Souza Chagas, Ana Carolina de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cattle tick
Methods of larvae estimation
Visual estimation
Quantification by sampling
Adult immersion test (AIT)
topic Cattle tick
Methods of larvae estimation
Visual estimation
Quantification by sampling
Adult immersion test (AIT)
description Reproductive parameters of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus are often evaluated. They are good indicators of resistance to commercial acaricides and of plant extracts' efficacy. The objective of this study was to compare the techniques: visual estimation and quantification by sampling used in the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) to calculate the hatching rate of eggs. Engorged females collected from cattle were subjected to the AIT with plant extracts and kept in an incubator for oviposition. The egg hatching was evaluated in 210 syringes by visual estimation (%). Then, eggs and larvae were counted into samples of 100 individuals, in three repetitions by stereo microscope. Significant differences were found between the two tests (p <= 0.05). The egg hatching average of visual estimation was higher than the quantification by sampling, 56.8-48.0, respectively (correlation = 0.85). We found that the visual assessment leads to a higher estimate of larvae in relation to eggs, because the infertile eggs can be concealed in the center of the syringe. In quantification by sampling, no statistical differences (p = 0.99) were observed in the pairwise counts between the three samples (48.1 +/- 26.6%, 47.8 +/- 26.9%, 48.1 +/- 26.5%) (correlation of repetitions = 0.96). This suggests that counting one sample is sufficient and the result should not differ much, regardless of the evaluator. Regarding the cutoff point of tick resistance status (95%), both methods are reliable. This study contributes to improvement of the AIT and can stimulate researchers to choose more accurate techniques for the assessment of egg hatching.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-15
2019-10-04T11:55:34Z
2019-10-04T11:55:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015
Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 264, p. 35-38, 2018.
0304-4017
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184168
10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015
WOS:000453621400005
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184168
identifier_str_mv Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 264, p. 35-38, 2018.
0304-4017
10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.015
WOS:000453621400005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Veterinary Parasitology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35-38
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964832776060928