New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242056 |
Resumo: | Leptospirosis is poorly studied in small ruminants raised in field semiarid conditions. In this study we compared serological, bacteriological and molecular diagnostic methods in ewes maintained in field Brazilian semiarid conditions. Blood, vaginal fluid and urine samples were collected from 60 Morada Nova ewes raised in a semi-intensive system in the Brazilian semiarid. Diagnostic tests performed were microscopic agglutination test (MAT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bacterial isolation. Anti-Leptospira sp. antibodies were found in eight (13.33%) animals analyzed by MAT at reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25), while Leptospira sp. DNA was detected in urine or vaginal fluid of 56 animals (93.33%). There was growth of leptospires in 10 urine cultures and in 11 vaginal fluid cultures, however, two of urine (2/60–3.33%) and eight cultures of vaginal fluid (8/60–13.33%) were confirmed by PCR. Two samples of vaginal fluid (one of each animal) were submitted to sequencing demonstrating 99% similarity with L. santarosai and L. interrogans. The highest MAT sensitivities were obtained with reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25) compared to 50 and 100. The performance of different diagnostic techniques for leptospirosis in ewes raised in field semiarid conditions allowed a better evaluation of the herd, as well as made it possible to identify carrier animals. Genital route may be important for efficient transmission and without dependence on environmental factors in ewes from semiarid, as well as it's highlighted that titer 1:25 in serology was more efficient, indicating its use in ewes in field semiarid conditions. |
id |
UNSP_163e9eadba40145fc7e6bc92d86fbb11 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/242056 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditionsControlDiagnostic methodsEnvironmentEpidemiologyLeptospirosisSmall RuminantsLeptospirosis is poorly studied in small ruminants raised in field semiarid conditions. In this study we compared serological, bacteriological and molecular diagnostic methods in ewes maintained in field Brazilian semiarid conditions. Blood, vaginal fluid and urine samples were collected from 60 Morada Nova ewes raised in a semi-intensive system in the Brazilian semiarid. Diagnostic tests performed were microscopic agglutination test (MAT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bacterial isolation. Anti-Leptospira sp. antibodies were found in eight (13.33%) animals analyzed by MAT at reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25), while Leptospira sp. DNA was detected in urine or vaginal fluid of 56 animals (93.33%). There was growth of leptospires in 10 urine cultures and in 11 vaginal fluid cultures, however, two of urine (2/60–3.33%) and eight cultures of vaginal fluid (8/60–13.33%) were confirmed by PCR. Two samples of vaginal fluid (one of each animal) were submitted to sequencing demonstrating 99% similarity with L. santarosai and L. interrogans. The highest MAT sensitivities were obtained with reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25) compared to 50 and 100. The performance of different diagnostic techniques for leptospirosis in ewes raised in field semiarid conditions allowed a better evaluation of the herd, as well as made it possible to identify carrier animals. Genital route may be important for efficient transmission and without dependence on environmental factors in ewes from semiarid, as well as it's highlighted that titer 1:25 in serology was more efficient, indicating its use in ewes in field semiarid conditions.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural (CSTR) Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Av. Universitária, s/n, Santa Cecília, PBFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ) Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n, campus de Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n, campus de Botucatu, SPCNPq: 302222/2016-2CNPq: 423836/2018-8Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Santos, Julio Cesar de Araujode Vasconcelos, Igor Felipe FerreiraNogueira, Denise BatistaJunior, Joao Pessoa Araujo [UNESP]Malossi, Camila Dantas [UNESP]Ullmann, Leila Sabrina [UNESP]Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo BatistaAlves, Clebert JoséSilva, Maria Luana Cristiny Rodriguesde Azevedo, Sérgio Santos2023-03-02T08:36:29Z2023-03-02T08:36:29Z2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610Acta Tropica, v. 234.1873-62540001-706Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24205610.1016/j.actatropica.2022.1066102-s2.0-85134531810Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Tropicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-02T08:36:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/242056Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:45:15.121388Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
title |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
spellingShingle |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions Santos, Julio Cesar de Araujo Control Diagnostic methods Environment Epidemiology Leptospirosis Small Ruminants |
title_short |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
title_full |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
title_fullStr |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
title_sort |
New insights on Leptospira sp. infection in ewes maintained in field semiarid conditions |
author |
Santos, Julio Cesar de Araujo |
author_facet |
Santos, Julio Cesar de Araujo de Vasconcelos, Igor Felipe Ferreira Nogueira, Denise Batista Junior, Joao Pessoa Araujo [UNESP] Malossi, Camila Dantas [UNESP] Ullmann, Leila Sabrina [UNESP] Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Alves, Clebert José Silva, Maria Luana Cristiny Rodrigues de Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Vasconcelos, Igor Felipe Ferreira Nogueira, Denise Batista Junior, Joao Pessoa Araujo [UNESP] Malossi, Camila Dantas [UNESP] Ullmann, Leila Sabrina [UNESP] Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Alves, Clebert José Silva, Maria Luana Cristiny Rodrigues de Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Julio Cesar de Araujo de Vasconcelos, Igor Felipe Ferreira Nogueira, Denise Batista Junior, Joao Pessoa Araujo [UNESP] Malossi, Camila Dantas [UNESP] Ullmann, Leila Sabrina [UNESP] Santos, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Alves, Clebert José Silva, Maria Luana Cristiny Rodrigues de Azevedo, Sérgio Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Control Diagnostic methods Environment Epidemiology Leptospirosis Small Ruminants |
topic |
Control Diagnostic methods Environment Epidemiology Leptospirosis Small Ruminants |
description |
Leptospirosis is poorly studied in small ruminants raised in field semiarid conditions. In this study we compared serological, bacteriological and molecular diagnostic methods in ewes maintained in field Brazilian semiarid conditions. Blood, vaginal fluid and urine samples were collected from 60 Morada Nova ewes raised in a semi-intensive system in the Brazilian semiarid. Diagnostic tests performed were microscopic agglutination test (MAT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bacterial isolation. Anti-Leptospira sp. antibodies were found in eight (13.33%) animals analyzed by MAT at reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25), while Leptospira sp. DNA was detected in urine or vaginal fluid of 56 animals (93.33%). There was growth of leptospires in 10 urine cultures and in 11 vaginal fluid cultures, however, two of urine (2/60–3.33%) and eight cultures of vaginal fluid (8/60–13.33%) were confirmed by PCR. Two samples of vaginal fluid (one of each animal) were submitted to sequencing demonstrating 99% similarity with L. santarosai and L. interrogans. The highest MAT sensitivities were obtained with reciprocal titer 25 (cut-off 25) compared to 50 and 100. The performance of different diagnostic techniques for leptospirosis in ewes raised in field semiarid conditions allowed a better evaluation of the herd, as well as made it possible to identify carrier animals. Genital route may be important for efficient transmission and without dependence on environmental factors in ewes from semiarid, as well as it's highlighted that titer 1:25 in serology was more efficient, indicating its use in ewes in field semiarid conditions. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 2023-03-02T08:36:29Z 2023-03-02T08:36:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610 Acta Tropica, v. 234. 1873-6254 0001-706X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242056 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610 2-s2.0-85134531810 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242056 |
identifier_str_mv |
Acta Tropica, v. 234. 1873-6254 0001-706X 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106610 2-s2.0-85134531810 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Tropica |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129242409467904 |