Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Terossi, M., Mantelatto, F. L., Costa, R. C. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/161880
Resumo: It is most difficult to identify the coexistent commercial pink shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and Farfantepenaeus paulensis during the juvenile stage, when secondary sexual characteristits are still in the developing period. Differences in width and/or shape of the dorsal furrow on pleonite six has traditionally been the primary character used to discriminate juveniles of these two taxa, but is unreliable. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the taxonomic morphological characteristics traditionally used to discriminate between these species are not effective for juveniles. Molecular analyses showed that the COI gene is an efficient marker for separating these two species and that traditional characteristics do not allow for the correct identification of juveniles of these species. In addition, we found that only 64% of juveniles identified a priori based on traditional morphological traits and subsequently verified molecularly were identified correctly. After molecular identification of the species, we searched for new morphological traits that could be used for reliable identification of juvenile and adult stages using morphometry and comparative morphology. The carapace length (CL) ranged from 12.5 to 26.9 mm in F. brasiliensis and from 9.4 to 49.5 mm in F. paulensis. We affirmed the efficiency of COI as a molecular marker and identified a new morphological trait that will. aid in the discrimination of juveniles of F. brasiliensis and F. paulensis. Contrary to our expectations, the characters identified by morphometric analysis were subtle and difficult to apply in field identification situations. However, when analyzing the external morphology of juveniles, it was possible to identify differences between the species in the anterior margin of gastrofrontal carina in relation to the rostrum teeth. In addition to corroborating the difficulty in identifying these two species, our study confirms the importance of the association between molecular and comparative morphology analyses in a fisheries and biodiversity context. Furthermore, we extended the geographic distribution of Farfantepenaeus subtilis through a new record from southern Cananeia, on the southern coast of Sao Paulo State. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_18058075c60b1a99b2e152d6e0ec21d9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/161880
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcodingBrazilFarfantepenaeusCytochrome oxidase IMorphometryPenaeoideaSpecies discriminationIt is most difficult to identify the coexistent commercial pink shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and Farfantepenaeus paulensis during the juvenile stage, when secondary sexual characteristits are still in the developing period. Differences in width and/or shape of the dorsal furrow on pleonite six has traditionally been the primary character used to discriminate juveniles of these two taxa, but is unreliable. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the taxonomic morphological characteristics traditionally used to discriminate between these species are not effective for juveniles. Molecular analyses showed that the COI gene is an efficient marker for separating these two species and that traditional characteristics do not allow for the correct identification of juveniles of these species. In addition, we found that only 64% of juveniles identified a priori based on traditional morphological traits and subsequently verified molecularly were identified correctly. After molecular identification of the species, we searched for new morphological traits that could be used for reliable identification of juvenile and adult stages using morphometry and comparative morphology. The carapace length (CL) ranged from 12.5 to 26.9 mm in F. brasiliensis and from 9.4 to 49.5 mm in F. paulensis. We affirmed the efficiency of COI as a molecular marker and identified a new morphological trait that will. aid in the discrimination of juveniles of F. brasiliensis and F. paulensis. Contrary to our expectations, the characters identified by morphometric analysis were subtle and difficult to apply in field identification situations. However, when analyzing the external morphology of juveniles, it was possible to identify differences between the species in the anterior margin of gastrofrontal carina in relation to the rostrum teeth. In addition to corroborating the difficulty in identifying these two species, our study confirms the importance of the association between molecular and comparative morphology analyses in a fisheries and biodiversity context. Furthermore, we extended the geographic distribution of Farfantepenaeus subtilis through a new record from southern Cananeia, on the southern coast of Sao Paulo State. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ciencias Biol, Lab Biol Camaroes Marinhos & Dulcicolas LABCAM, Av Engn Luiz Edmundo Corrijo Coube 14-01, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, FFCLRP, LBSC, BR-14040901 Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ciencias Biol, Lab Biol Camaroes Marinhos & Dulcicolas LABCAM, Av Engn Luiz Edmundo Corrijo Coube 14-01, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, BrazilFAPESP: Tematico Biota 2010/50188-8FAPESP: 2011/16268-7FAPESP: PD 2011/11901-3CAPES: 2005/2014 - 23038.004308/2014-14CNPq: 305919/2014-8CNPq: 304968/2014-5Elsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]Terossi, M.Mantelatto, F. L.Costa, R. C. [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:04:30Z2018-11-26T17:04:30Z2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article244-253application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009Fisheries Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 183, p. 244-253, 2016.0165-7836http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16188010.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009WOS:000382599600025WOS000382599600025.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFisheries Research0,941info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-23T15:23:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/161880Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:21:30.562531Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
title Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
spellingShingle Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]
Brazil
Farfantepenaeus
Cytochrome oxidase I
Morphometry
Penaeoidea
Species discrimination
title_short Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
title_full Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
title_fullStr Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
title_full_unstemmed Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
title_sort Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): An integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding
author Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]
author_facet Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]
Terossi, M.
Mantelatto, F. L.
Costa, R. C. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Terossi, M.
Mantelatto, F. L.
Costa, R. C. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teodoro, S. S. A. [UNESP]
Terossi, M.
Mantelatto, F. L.
Costa, R. C. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazil
Farfantepenaeus
Cytochrome oxidase I
Morphometry
Penaeoidea
Species discrimination
topic Brazil
Farfantepenaeus
Cytochrome oxidase I
Morphometry
Penaeoidea
Species discrimination
description It is most difficult to identify the coexistent commercial pink shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and Farfantepenaeus paulensis during the juvenile stage, when secondary sexual characteristits are still in the developing period. Differences in width and/or shape of the dorsal furrow on pleonite six has traditionally been the primary character used to discriminate juveniles of these two taxa, but is unreliable. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the taxonomic morphological characteristics traditionally used to discriminate between these species are not effective for juveniles. Molecular analyses showed that the COI gene is an efficient marker for separating these two species and that traditional characteristics do not allow for the correct identification of juveniles of these species. In addition, we found that only 64% of juveniles identified a priori based on traditional morphological traits and subsequently verified molecularly were identified correctly. After molecular identification of the species, we searched for new morphological traits that could be used for reliable identification of juvenile and adult stages using morphometry and comparative morphology. The carapace length (CL) ranged from 12.5 to 26.9 mm in F. brasiliensis and from 9.4 to 49.5 mm in F. paulensis. We affirmed the efficiency of COI as a molecular marker and identified a new morphological trait that will. aid in the discrimination of juveniles of F. brasiliensis and F. paulensis. Contrary to our expectations, the characters identified by morphometric analysis were subtle and difficult to apply in field identification situations. However, when analyzing the external morphology of juveniles, it was possible to identify differences between the species in the anterior margin of gastrofrontal carina in relation to the rostrum teeth. In addition to corroborating the difficulty in identifying these two species, our study confirms the importance of the association between molecular and comparative morphology analyses in a fisheries and biodiversity context. Furthermore, we extended the geographic distribution of Farfantepenaeus subtilis through a new record from southern Cananeia, on the southern coast of Sao Paulo State. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-01
2018-11-26T17:04:30Z
2018-11-26T17:04:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009
Fisheries Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 183, p. 244-253, 2016.
0165-7836
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/161880
10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009
WOS:000382599600025
WOS000382599600025.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/161880
identifier_str_mv Fisheries Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 183, p. 244-253, 2016.
0165-7836
10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.009
WOS:000382599600025
WOS000382599600025.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fisheries Research
0,941
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 244-253
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129312732217344