Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241116 |
Resumo: | The depletion of primary ores, the environmental concerns related to mining activities, and the need to promote circular economy has drawn attention to the recycling of metallic compounds. Bio-based technologies are suitable for metal recovery, as they operate under mild conditions (ambient temperature and pressure) and are ideal for treating low-concentration waters. This study compared the effectiveness of adsorption and precipitation for the removal and recovery of gallium, germanium and zinc. Adsorption of the metallic ions on elemental forms of sulfur (S0), selenium (Se0) and tellurium (Te0), both of chemical and biological sources, was tested. Biosorption onto elemental forms of S0bio, Se0bio and Te0bio effectively removed Ga and Zn. The highest removal efficiency (ղ) was obtained for Ga onto the adsorbent Te0bio (69 ± 0.4%), with an adsorption capacity (q) of 74 mg Ga (g Te0bio)−1, followed by Zn (ղ = 40 ± 0.7%) with 43 mg Zn (g Te0bio)−1. Precipitation with chemical and biogenic sulfide at different metal to sulfide (Me/S) ratios was also assessed. Biologically produced sulfide was more efficient for Ga and Zn compared to chemical sulfide. Precipitation with biogenic sulfide was efficient for the removal of Ga (ղ = 59.9 ± 2.6%) and Zn (ղ = 44.2 ± 3.0%). The lowest ratio between metal to sulfide (Me/S = 0.2) achieved higher zinc removal efficiencies, whereas gallium removal was more efficient at Me/S = 1.5. None of the tested methods allowed for recovery of Ge. Biosorption and bioprecipitation gave nevertheless high removal and recovery of Ga and Zn. |
id |
UNSP_1fabffb7a3d2ef4a4b0f6013caac08e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241116 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitationAdsorptionGalliumGermaniumPrecipitationTelluriumZincThe depletion of primary ores, the environmental concerns related to mining activities, and the need to promote circular economy has drawn attention to the recycling of metallic compounds. Bio-based technologies are suitable for metal recovery, as they operate under mild conditions (ambient temperature and pressure) and are ideal for treating low-concentration waters. This study compared the effectiveness of adsorption and precipitation for the removal and recovery of gallium, germanium and zinc. Adsorption of the metallic ions on elemental forms of sulfur (S0), selenium (Se0) and tellurium (Te0), both of chemical and biological sources, was tested. Biosorption onto elemental forms of S0bio, Se0bio and Te0bio effectively removed Ga and Zn. The highest removal efficiency (ղ) was obtained for Ga onto the adsorbent Te0bio (69 ± 0.4%), with an adsorption capacity (q) of 74 mg Ga (g Te0bio)−1, followed by Zn (ղ = 40 ± 0.7%) with 43 mg Zn (g Te0bio)−1. Precipitation with chemical and biogenic sulfide at different metal to sulfide (Me/S) ratios was also assessed. Biologically produced sulfide was more efficient for Ga and Zn compared to chemical sulfide. Precipitation with biogenic sulfide was efficient for the removal of Ga (ղ = 59.9 ± 2.6%) and Zn (ղ = 44.2 ± 3.0%). The lowest ratio between metal to sulfide (Me/S = 0.2) achieved higher zinc removal efficiencies, whereas gallium removal was more efficient at Me/S = 1.5. None of the tested methods allowed for recovery of Ge. Biosorption and bioprecipitation gave nevertheless high removal and recovery of Ga and Zn.National University of Ireland University RoadDepartment of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University, R. Francisco Degni, 55Biological Processes Laboratory Center for Research Development and Innovation in Environmental Engineering São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC) University of São Paulo (USP), Engenharia Ambiental – Bloco 4-F, Av. João Dagnone, 1100 – Santa Angelina, 13.563-120Department of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University, R. Francisco Degni, 55University RoadUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Saikia, SudeshnaCosta, Rachel B. [UNESP]Sinharoy, ArindamCunha, Mirabelle P.Zaiat, MarceloLens, Piet N.L.2023-03-01T20:47:50Z2023-03-01T20:47:50Z2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396Journal of Environmental Management, v. 317.1095-86300301-4797http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24111610.1016/j.jenvman.2022.1153962-s2.0-85131443769Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Environmental Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:47:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241116Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:50:13.439655Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
title |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
spellingShingle |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation Saikia, Sudeshna Adsorption Gallium Germanium Precipitation Tellurium Zinc |
title_short |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
title_full |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
title_fullStr |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
title_sort |
Selective removal and recovery of gallium and germanium from synthetic zinc refinery residues using biosorption and bioprecipitation |
author |
Saikia, Sudeshna |
author_facet |
Saikia, Sudeshna Costa, Rachel B. [UNESP] Sinharoy, Arindam Cunha, Mirabelle P. Zaiat, Marcelo Lens, Piet N.L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Rachel B. [UNESP] Sinharoy, Arindam Cunha, Mirabelle P. Zaiat, Marcelo Lens, Piet N.L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
University Road Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saikia, Sudeshna Costa, Rachel B. [UNESP] Sinharoy, Arindam Cunha, Mirabelle P. Zaiat, Marcelo Lens, Piet N.L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adsorption Gallium Germanium Precipitation Tellurium Zinc |
topic |
Adsorption Gallium Germanium Precipitation Tellurium Zinc |
description |
The depletion of primary ores, the environmental concerns related to mining activities, and the need to promote circular economy has drawn attention to the recycling of metallic compounds. Bio-based technologies are suitable for metal recovery, as they operate under mild conditions (ambient temperature and pressure) and are ideal for treating low-concentration waters. This study compared the effectiveness of adsorption and precipitation for the removal and recovery of gallium, germanium and zinc. Adsorption of the metallic ions on elemental forms of sulfur (S0), selenium (Se0) and tellurium (Te0), both of chemical and biological sources, was tested. Biosorption onto elemental forms of S0bio, Se0bio and Te0bio effectively removed Ga and Zn. The highest removal efficiency (ղ) was obtained for Ga onto the adsorbent Te0bio (69 ± 0.4%), with an adsorption capacity (q) of 74 mg Ga (g Te0bio)−1, followed by Zn (ղ = 40 ± 0.7%) with 43 mg Zn (g Te0bio)−1. Precipitation with chemical and biogenic sulfide at different metal to sulfide (Me/S) ratios was also assessed. Biologically produced sulfide was more efficient for Ga and Zn compared to chemical sulfide. Precipitation with biogenic sulfide was efficient for the removal of Ga (ղ = 59.9 ± 2.6%) and Zn (ղ = 44.2 ± 3.0%). The lowest ratio between metal to sulfide (Me/S = 0.2) achieved higher zinc removal efficiencies, whereas gallium removal was more efficient at Me/S = 1.5. None of the tested methods allowed for recovery of Ge. Biosorption and bioprecipitation gave nevertheless high removal and recovery of Ga and Zn. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-01 2023-03-01T20:47:50Z 2023-03-01T20:47:50Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396 Journal of Environmental Management, v. 317. 1095-8630 0301-4797 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241116 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396 2-s2.0-85131443769 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241116 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Environmental Management, v. 317. 1095-8630 0301-4797 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115396 2-s2.0-85131443769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Environmental Management |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129256436269056 |