Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340
Resumo: There are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods.
id UNSP_22ac917239634e77201704544ae906aa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/6340
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campoCalculation of the Class-A pan coefficient in greenhouse and field by different methodsEvapotranspirationIrrigation managementGreenhouseThere are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods.Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agronomicas, Dept Recursos Nat, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agronomicas, Dept Recursos Nat, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:21:52Z2014-05-20T13:21:52Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article451-463application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011.1676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/634010.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451WOS:000297934400006WOS000297934400006.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporSemina: Ciências Agrárias0.349info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T19:29:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/6340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:59:13.294621Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
Calculation of the Class-A pan coefficient in greenhouse and field by different methods
title Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
spellingShingle Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]
Evapotranspiration
Irrigation management
Greenhouse
title_short Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
title_full Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
title_fullStr Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
title_full_unstemmed Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
title_sort Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
author Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]
author_facet Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evapotranspiration
Irrigation management
Greenhouse
topic Evapotranspiration
Irrigation management
Greenhouse
description There are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
2014-05-20T13:21:52Z
2014-05-20T13:21:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451
Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011.
1676-546X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451
WOS:000297934400006
WOS000297934400006.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340
identifier_str_mv Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011.
1676-546X
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451
WOS:000297934400006
WOS000297934400006.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias
0.349
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 451-463
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129381690769408