Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340 |
Resumo: | There are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods. |
id |
UNSP_22ac917239634e77201704544ae906aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/6340 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campoCalculation of the Class-A pan coefficient in greenhouse and field by different methodsEvapotranspirationIrrigation managementGreenhouseThere are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods.Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agronomicas, Dept Recursos Nat, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agronomicas, Dept Recursos Nat, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:21:52Z2014-05-20T13:21:52Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article451-463application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011.1676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/634010.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451WOS:000297934400006WOS000297934400006.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporSemina: Ciências Agrárias0.349info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T19:29:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/6340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:59:13.294621Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo Calculation of the Class-A pan coefficient in greenhouse and field by different methods |
title |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
spellingShingle |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP] Evapotranspiration Irrigation management Greenhouse |
title_short |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
title_full |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
title_fullStr |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
title_sort |
Coeficiente do tanque Classe A obtido por diferentes métodos em ambiente protegido e no campo |
author |
Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Evapotranspiration Irrigation management Greenhouse |
topic |
Evapotranspiration Irrigation management Greenhouse |
description |
There are several methods for determining the Class-A pan coefficient (Kp) to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is of great importance to water management in agriculture. Most of these methods take into account the wind speed, relative humidity and the fetch area. This study was done in region of Botucatu, SP, in greenhouse and field in the months of July-August (dry) and September-October (rainy), used the methods of Doorenbos e Pruitt (1977), Cuenca (1989), Snyder (1992), Pereira et al. (1995), Allen et al. (1998) and correlation between ETo determined by Penman-Monteith (EToPM) and evaporation of the Class-A pan (ECA). The EToPM was used as standard for the correlations between the ETo determined by the Class-A pan (EToTCA) obtained by different methods of Kp. The Kp in greenhouse ranged between 0.51 and 0.85, and in the field from 0.33 to 0.85. The methods of Allen et al. (1998) and Snyder (1992) are the most recommended for dry months in greenhouse and rainy months the correlation between the ECA and EToPM e Cuenca (1989). In the field condition, the methods of Allen et al. (1998) and of correlation between the ECA and EToPM for dry months, and for rainy months of Allen et al. (1998) and Cuenca (1989). The method of Allen et al. (1998) was the most efficient, regardless of the environment and of months analyzed. The fixed value of Kp should only be used when it is not possible to determine from its more sophisticated methods. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 2014-05-20T13:21:52Z 2014-05-20T13:21:52Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451 Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011. 1676-546X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451 WOS:000297934400006 WOS000297934400006.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6340 |
identifier_str_mv |
Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), v. 32, n. 2, p. 451-463, 2011. 1676-546X 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p451 WOS:000297934400006 WOS000297934400006.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias 0.349 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
451-463 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129381690769408 |