Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025285 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207569 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Surface treatment of medical devices may be a way of avoiding the need for replacement of these devices and the comorbidities associated with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre- and postcontamination washing of 2 prostheses with different textures can decrease bacterial contamination.The following microorganisms were evaluated: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis. Silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular prostheses were used and divided into 3 groups: prostheses contaminated; prostheses contaminated and treated before contamination; and prostheses contaminated and treated after contamination. Treatments were performed with antibiotic solution, chlorhexidine and lidocaine. After one week of incubation, the prostheses were sown in culture medium, which was incubated for 48 hours. The area of colony formation was evaluated by fractal dimension, an image analysis tool.The antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of S epidermidis and chlorhexidine decrease in 53% the colonization density for S aureus in for both prostheses in the pre-washing. In postcontamination washing, the antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of all bacteria evaluated; there was a 60% decrease in the colonization density of S aureus and absence of colonization for E faecalis with chlorhexidine; and lidocaine inhibited the growth of S aureus in both prostheses.Antibiotic solution showed the highest efficiency in inhibiting bacterial growth, especially for S epidermidis, in both washings. Lidocaine was able to reduce colonization by S aureus in post-contamination washing, showing that it can be used as an alternative adjuvant treatment in these cases. |
id |
UNSP_24d7b21bc3ef61413c34c321b66d59b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207569 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro studyABSTRACT: Surface treatment of medical devices may be a way of avoiding the need for replacement of these devices and the comorbidities associated with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre- and postcontamination washing of 2 prostheses with different textures can decrease bacterial contamination.The following microorganisms were evaluated: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis. Silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular prostheses were used and divided into 3 groups: prostheses contaminated; prostheses contaminated and treated before contamination; and prostheses contaminated and treated after contamination. Treatments were performed with antibiotic solution, chlorhexidine and lidocaine. After one week of incubation, the prostheses were sown in culture medium, which was incubated for 48 hours. The area of colony formation was evaluated by fractal dimension, an image analysis tool.The antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of S epidermidis and chlorhexidine decrease in 53% the colonization density for S aureus in for both prostheses in the pre-washing. In postcontamination washing, the antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of all bacteria evaluated; there was a 60% decrease in the colonization density of S aureus and absence of colonization for E faecalis with chlorhexidine; and lidocaine inhibited the growth of S aureus in both prostheses.Antibiotic solution showed the highest efficiency in inhibiting bacterial growth, especially for S epidermidis, in both washings. Lidocaine was able to reduce colonization by S aureus in post-contamination washing, showing that it can be used as an alternative adjuvant treatment in these cases.Department of PathologyGraduate Program in Health SciencesGraduate Program in Animal ScienceSchool of MedicineDepartment of SurgeryLaboratory of Clinical AnalysisDepartment of Microbiology Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Plastic SurgeryDepartment of Pathology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Pathology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate Program in Health SciencesGraduate Program in Animal ScienceSchool of MedicineLaboratory of Clinical AnalysisUniversidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Nai, Gisele AlborghettiMedina, Denis Aloísio LopesMartelli, Cesar Alberto Talaverade Oliveira, Mayla Silva CayresPortelinha, Maria Júlia SchadeckHenriques, Bruno CarvalhoCaldeira, Isadora DelfinoAlmeida, Mércia de CarvalhoEller, Lizziane Kretli WinkelstroterNeto, Fausto Viterbo de OliveiraMarques, Mariângela Esther Alencar [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:57:26Z2021-06-25T10:57:26Z2021-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee25285http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025285Medicine, v. 100, n. 13, p. e25285-, 2021.1536-5964http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20756910.1097/MD.00000000000252852-s2.0-85103745935Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMedicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-03T13:18:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207569Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-03T13:18:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
title |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
spellingShingle |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study Nai, Gisele Alborghetti |
title_short |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
title_full |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
title_sort |
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study |
author |
Nai, Gisele Alborghetti |
author_facet |
Nai, Gisele Alborghetti Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera de Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck Henriques, Bruno Carvalho Caldeira, Isadora Delfino Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter Neto, Fausto Viterbo de Oliveira Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera de Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck Henriques, Bruno Carvalho Caldeira, Isadora Delfino Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter Neto, Fausto Viterbo de Oliveira Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Graduate Program in Health Sciences Graduate Program in Animal Science School of Medicine Laboratory of Clinical Analysis Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nai, Gisele Alborghetti Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera de Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck Henriques, Bruno Carvalho Caldeira, Isadora Delfino Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter Neto, Fausto Viterbo de Oliveira Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar [UNESP] |
description |
ABSTRACT: Surface treatment of medical devices may be a way of avoiding the need for replacement of these devices and the comorbidities associated with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre- and postcontamination washing of 2 prostheses with different textures can decrease bacterial contamination.The following microorganisms were evaluated: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis. Silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular prostheses were used and divided into 3 groups: prostheses contaminated; prostheses contaminated and treated before contamination; and prostheses contaminated and treated after contamination. Treatments were performed with antibiotic solution, chlorhexidine and lidocaine. After one week of incubation, the prostheses were sown in culture medium, which was incubated for 48 hours. The area of colony formation was evaluated by fractal dimension, an image analysis tool.The antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of S epidermidis and chlorhexidine decrease in 53% the colonization density for S aureus in for both prostheses in the pre-washing. In postcontamination washing, the antibiotic solution inhibited the growth of all bacteria evaluated; there was a 60% decrease in the colonization density of S aureus and absence of colonization for E faecalis with chlorhexidine; and lidocaine inhibited the growth of S aureus in both prostheses.Antibiotic solution showed the highest efficiency in inhibiting bacterial growth, especially for S epidermidis, in both washings. Lidocaine was able to reduce colonization by S aureus in post-contamination washing, showing that it can be used as an alternative adjuvant treatment in these cases. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:57:26Z 2021-06-25T10:57:26Z 2021-04-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025285 Medicine, v. 100, n. 13, p. e25285-, 2021. 1536-5964 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207569 10.1097/MD.0000000000025285 2-s2.0-85103745935 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025285 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207569 |
identifier_str_mv |
Medicine, v. 100, n. 13, p. e25285-, 2021. 1536-5964 10.1097/MD.0000000000025285 2-s2.0-85103745935 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
e25285 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021409943977984 |