Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chanut, T. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Winter, O. C. [UNESP], Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820
Resumo: Aims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen.
id UNSP_25d2469e931444c812847819d7995ba1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/21820
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamicsPlanets and satellites - Formationminor planets, asteroidscelestial mechanicsAims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen.UNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilUNESP, DCCE, IBILCE, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrazilUNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilUNESP, DCCE, IBILCE, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrazilEdp Sciences S AUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Chanut, T. [UNESP]Winter, O. C. [UNESP]Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]2014-05-20T14:01:50Z2014-05-20T14:01:50Z2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article519-527application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008.0004-6361http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2182010.1051/0004-6361:20078059WOS:000254515800027WOS000254515800027.pdf3560557415176717Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAstronomy & Astrophysics2,265info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-26T06:05:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/21820Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:59:57.451709Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
title Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
spellingShingle Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
Chanut, T. [UNESP]
Planets and satellites - Formation
minor planets, asteroids
celestial mechanics
title_short Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
title_full Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
title_fullStr Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
title_sort Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
author Chanut, T. [UNESP]
author_facet Chanut, T. [UNESP]
Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chanut, T. [UNESP]
Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Planets and satellites - Formation
minor planets, asteroids
celestial mechanics
topic Planets and satellites - Formation
minor planets, asteroids
celestial mechanics
description Aims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
2014-05-20T14:01:50Z
2014-05-20T14:01:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059
Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008.
0004-6361
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820
10.1051/0004-6361:20078059
WOS:000254515800027
WOS000254515800027.pdf
3560557415176717
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820
identifier_str_mv Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008.
0004-6361
10.1051/0004-6361:20078059
WOS:000254515800027
WOS000254515800027.pdf
3560557415176717
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Astronomy & Astrophysics
2,265
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 519-527
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edp Sciences S A
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edp Sciences S A
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128591441952768