Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820 |
Resumo: | Aims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen. |
id |
UNSP_25d2469e931444c812847819d7995ba1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/21820 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamicsPlanets and satellites - Formationminor planets, asteroidscelestial mechanicsAims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen.UNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilUNESP, DCCE, IBILCE, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrazilUNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilUNESP, DCCE, IBILCE, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrazilEdp Sciences S AUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Chanut, T. [UNESP]Winter, O. C. [UNESP]Tsuchida, M. [UNESP]2014-05-20T14:01:50Z2014-05-20T14:01:50Z2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article519-527application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008.0004-6361http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2182010.1051/0004-6361:20078059WOS:000254515800027WOS000254515800027.pdf3560557415176717Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAstronomy & Astrophysics2,265info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-26T06:05:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/21820Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:59:57.451709Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
title |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
spellingShingle |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics Chanut, T. [UNESP] Planets and satellites - Formation minor planets, asteroids celestial mechanics |
title_short |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
title_full |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
title_fullStr |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
title_sort |
Nebular gas drag and co-orbital system dynamics |
author |
Chanut, T. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Chanut, T. [UNESP] Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Tsuchida, M. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Tsuchida, M. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chanut, T. [UNESP] Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Tsuchida, M. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Planets and satellites - Formation minor planets, asteroids celestial mechanics |
topic |
Planets and satellites - Formation minor planets, asteroids celestial mechanics |
description |
Aims. We study trajectories of planetesimals whose orbits decay due to gas drag in a primordial solar nebula and are perturbed by the gravity of the secondary body on an eccentric orbit whose mass ratio takes values from mu(2) = 10(-7) to mu(2) = 10(-3) increasing ten times at each step. Each planetesimal ultimately suffers one of the three possible fates: (1) trapping in a mean motion resonance with the secondary body; (2) collision with the secondary body and consequent increase of its mass; or (3) diffusion after crossing the orbit of the secondary body.Methods. We take the Burlirsh-Stoer numerical algorithm in order to integrate the Newtonian equations of the planar, elliptical restricted three-body problem with the secondary body and the planetesimal orbiting the primary. It is assumed that there is no interaction among planetesimals, and also that the gas does not affect the orbit of the secondary body.Results. The results show that the optimal value of the gas drag constant k for the 1: 1 resonance is between 0.9 and 1.25, representing a meter size planetesimal for each AU of orbital radius. In this study, the conditions of the gas drag are such that in theory, L4 no longer exists in the circular case for a critical value of k that defines a limit size of the planetesimal, but for a secondary body with an eccentricity larger than 0.05 when mu(2) = 10(-6), it reappears. The decrease of the cutoff collision radius increase the difusions but does not affect the distribution of trapping. The contribution to the mass accretion of the secondary body is over 40% with a collision radius 0.05R(Hill) and less than 15% with 0.005R(Hill) for mu(2) = 10(-7). The trappings no longer occur when the drag constant k reachs 30. That means that the size limit of planetesimal trapping is 0.2 m per AU of orbital radius. In most cases, this accretion occurs for a weak gas drag and small secondary eccentricity. The diffusions represent most of the simulations showing that gas drag is an efficient process in scattering planetesimals and that the trapping of planetesimals in the 1: 1 resonance is a less probable fate. These results depend on the specific drag force chosen. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-01 2014-05-20T14:01:50Z 2014-05-20T14:01:50Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059 Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008. 0004-6361 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820 10.1051/0004-6361:20078059 WOS:000254515800027 WOS000254515800027.pdf 3560557415176717 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078059 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21820 |
identifier_str_mv |
Astronomy & Astrophysics. Les Ulis Cedex A: Edp Sciences S A, v. 481, n. 2, p. 519-527, 2008. 0004-6361 10.1051/0004-6361:20078059 WOS:000254515800027 WOS000254515800027.pdf 3560557415176717 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Astronomy & Astrophysics 2,265 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
519-527 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edp Sciences S A |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edp Sciences S A |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128591441952768 |