Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233026 |
Resumo: | For the lettuce crop, there is no specific or standard methodology to evaluate genotype resistance of lettuce against downy mildew. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare three methodologies for the identification of resistance to downy mildew. The experiment was carried out at Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo Campus between 2017 and 2018. The statistical method used was a completely randomized design with 12 treatments (cultivar Solaris, used as a control; and 11 genotypes of lettuce F5: 6: UFU-Crespa 75 # 2, UFU-Crespa 189 # 2, UFU-Crespa 206 # 1, UFU-Lisa 66 # 3, UFU-Lisa 66 # 7, UFU-Lisa 215 # 3, UFU-Lisa 215 # 6, UFU-Lisa 215 # 10, UFU-Lisa 215 # 12, UFU-Lisa 215 # 13, UFU-Lisa 215 # 14) and four replications. The seeding of genotypes was carried out in transparent boxes and after 15 days the inoculation was performed using a spore suspension (1x104 sporangia/ml) and sterile deionized water for the controls. The disease progression was assessed by three methods: Mesquita, Dickinson & Crute and Horsfall & Barrat. The data were standardized and submitted to the univariate analysis of variance by the F test and multivariate analyzes. The univariate clustering results allowed the separation of the genotypes into two distinct resistance groups for the Dickinson & Crute and Mesquita methods. In the multivariate analysis, more formation of groups among genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew in the Mesquita method was observed. The methodology proposed by Mesquita was more efficient in discriminating genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew, separating them in a larger number of groups. |
id |
UNSP_2ea2c165f86531e6ed24130afead387a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233026 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucaeDowny mildewLactuca sativa L.MethodologiesMultivariate analyzesPlant breedingFor the lettuce crop, there is no specific or standard methodology to evaluate genotype resistance of lettuce against downy mildew. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare three methodologies for the identification of resistance to downy mildew. The experiment was carried out at Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo Campus between 2017 and 2018. The statistical method used was a completely randomized design with 12 treatments (cultivar Solaris, used as a control; and 11 genotypes of lettuce F5: 6: UFU-Crespa 75 # 2, UFU-Crespa 189 # 2, UFU-Crespa 206 # 1, UFU-Lisa 66 # 3, UFU-Lisa 66 # 7, UFU-Lisa 215 # 3, UFU-Lisa 215 # 6, UFU-Lisa 215 # 10, UFU-Lisa 215 # 12, UFU-Lisa 215 # 13, UFU-Lisa 215 # 14) and four replications. The seeding of genotypes was carried out in transparent boxes and after 15 days the inoculation was performed using a spore suspension (1x104 sporangia/ml) and sterile deionized water for the controls. The disease progression was assessed by three methods: Mesquita, Dickinson & Crute and Horsfall & Barrat. The data were standardized and submitted to the univariate analysis of variance by the F test and multivariate analyzes. The univariate clustering results allowed the separation of the genotypes into two distinct resistance groups for the Dickinson & Crute and Mesquita methods. In the multivariate analysis, more formation of groups among genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew in the Mesquita method was observed. The methodology proposed by Mesquita was more efficient in discriminating genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew, separating them in a larger number of groups.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Instituto de Ciências Agrárias Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus de Monte CarmeloGulf Coast Research and Education Center University of FloridaDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho'Departamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho'Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)University of FloridaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Jacinto, Ana Carolina Piresda Silveira, Aline Joséda Silva, Isadora GonçalvesCastoldi, RenataFranco, Carolina Andrade [UNESP]Finzi, Rafael ResendeMarin, Marcus ViníciusBraz, Leila Trevisan [UNESP]Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas2022-05-01T00:03:30Z2022-05-01T00:03:30Z2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1283-1287http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1283-1287, 2020.1835-27071835-2693http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23302610.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p24352-s2.0-85090561362Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAustralian Journal of Crop Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:54:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233026Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:15:32.017Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
title |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae Jacinto, Ana Carolina Pires Downy mildew Lactuca sativa L. Methodologies Multivariate analyzes Plant breeding |
title_short |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
title_full |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
title_sort |
Comparison of methods to evaluate resistance of lettuce genotypes against Bremia lactucae |
author |
Jacinto, Ana Carolina Pires |
author_facet |
Jacinto, Ana Carolina Pires da Silveira, Aline José da Silva, Isadora Gonçalves Castoldi, Renata Franco, Carolina Andrade [UNESP] Finzi, Rafael Resende Marin, Marcus Vinícius Braz, Leila Trevisan [UNESP] Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Silveira, Aline José da Silva, Isadora Gonçalves Castoldi, Renata Franco, Carolina Andrade [UNESP] Finzi, Rafael Resende Marin, Marcus Vinícius Braz, Leila Trevisan [UNESP] Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) University of Florida Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jacinto, Ana Carolina Pires da Silveira, Aline José da Silva, Isadora Gonçalves Castoldi, Renata Franco, Carolina Andrade [UNESP] Finzi, Rafael Resende Marin, Marcus Vinícius Braz, Leila Trevisan [UNESP] Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Downy mildew Lactuca sativa L. Methodologies Multivariate analyzes Plant breeding |
topic |
Downy mildew Lactuca sativa L. Methodologies Multivariate analyzes Plant breeding |
description |
For the lettuce crop, there is no specific or standard methodology to evaluate genotype resistance of lettuce against downy mildew. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare three methodologies for the identification of resistance to downy mildew. The experiment was carried out at Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo Campus between 2017 and 2018. The statistical method used was a completely randomized design with 12 treatments (cultivar Solaris, used as a control; and 11 genotypes of lettuce F5: 6: UFU-Crespa 75 # 2, UFU-Crespa 189 # 2, UFU-Crespa 206 # 1, UFU-Lisa 66 # 3, UFU-Lisa 66 # 7, UFU-Lisa 215 # 3, UFU-Lisa 215 # 6, UFU-Lisa 215 # 10, UFU-Lisa 215 # 12, UFU-Lisa 215 # 13, UFU-Lisa 215 # 14) and four replications. The seeding of genotypes was carried out in transparent boxes and after 15 days the inoculation was performed using a spore suspension (1x104 sporangia/ml) and sterile deionized water for the controls. The disease progression was assessed by three methods: Mesquita, Dickinson & Crute and Horsfall & Barrat. The data were standardized and submitted to the univariate analysis of variance by the F test and multivariate analyzes. The univariate clustering results allowed the separation of the genotypes into two distinct resistance groups for the Dickinson & Crute and Mesquita methods. In the multivariate analysis, more formation of groups among genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew in the Mesquita method was observed. The methodology proposed by Mesquita was more efficient in discriminating genotypes with different levels of resistance to downy mildew, separating them in a larger number of groups. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-01 2022-05-01T00:03:30Z 2022-05-01T00:03:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435 Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1283-1287, 2020. 1835-2707 1835-2693 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233026 10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435 2-s2.0-85090561362 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233026 |
identifier_str_mv |
Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1283-1287, 2020. 1835-2707 1835-2693 10.21475/ajcs.20.14.08.p2435 2-s2.0-85090561362 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Australian Journal of Crop Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1283-1287 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128490515464192 |