S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bergantin, Bianca Tozi Portaluppe
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira, Cruvinel, Thiago, Wang, Linda, Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo, Borges, Alessandra Buhler [UNESP], Honório, Heitor Marques, Rios, Daniela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231601
Resumo: This study evaluated Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG)-based-composites’ surface resistance against erosive wear and their protective effect on surrounding enamel. Bovine enamel was randomized into 12 groups (n = 10/group) [erosion (e) or erosion + abrasion (a)]: nanohybrid-S-PRG-based composite (SPRGe/SPRGa), nanohybrid-S-PRG-based bulk-fill (SPRGBFe/SPRGBFa), nanoparticle-composite (RCe/RCa), nanohybrid-bulk-fill (BFe/BFa), Glass Hybrid Restorative System (GHRSe/GHRSa), and resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (RMGICe/RMGICa). Cavities were prepared and restored. Initial profile assessment was performed on material and on adjacent enamel at distances of 100, 200, 300, 600, and 700 μm from margin. Specimens were immersed in citric acid (2 min; 6×/day for 5 days) for erosion. Erosion + abrasion groups were brushed for 1 min after erosion. Final profile assessment was performed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey-test showed: for erosion, the GHRSe and RMGICe presented greater material wear compared to the other groups (p = 0.001); up to 300 μm away from restoration, GHRSe and SPRGBFe were able to prevent enamel loss compared to RMGICe and other composite groups (p = 0.001). For erosion + abrasion, none of the materials exhibited a significant protective effect and S-PRG-based groups showed lower wear than RMGICa and GHRSa, and higher wear than composites (p = 0.001). S-PRG-based-composites can diminish surrounding enamel loss only against erosion alone, similarly to GIC, with advantage of being a more resistant material.
id UNSP_2ff33e38afed56b784e244cd869d2dc2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231601
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamelThis study evaluated Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG)-based-composites’ surface resistance against erosive wear and their protective effect on surrounding enamel. Bovine enamel was randomized into 12 groups (n = 10/group) [erosion (e) or erosion + abrasion (a)]: nanohybrid-S-PRG-based composite (SPRGe/SPRGa), nanohybrid-S-PRG-based bulk-fill (SPRGBFe/SPRGBFa), nanoparticle-composite (RCe/RCa), nanohybrid-bulk-fill (BFe/BFa), Glass Hybrid Restorative System (GHRSe/GHRSa), and resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (RMGICe/RMGICa). Cavities were prepared and restored. Initial profile assessment was performed on material and on adjacent enamel at distances of 100, 200, 300, 600, and 700 μm from margin. Specimens were immersed in citric acid (2 min; 6×/day for 5 days) for erosion. Erosion + abrasion groups were brushed for 1 min after erosion. Final profile assessment was performed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey-test showed: for erosion, the GHRSe and RMGICe presented greater material wear compared to the other groups (p = 0.001); up to 300 μm away from restoration, GHRSe and SPRGBFe were able to prevent enamel loss compared to RMGICe and other composite groups (p = 0.001). For erosion + abrasion, none of the materials exhibited a significant protective effect and S-PRG-based groups showed lower wear than RMGICa and GHRSa, and higher wear than composites (p = 0.001). S-PRG-based-composites can diminish surrounding enamel loss only against erosion alone, similarly to GIC, with advantage of being a more resistant material.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Department of Pediatric Dentistry Orthodontics and Public Health Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, SPDepartment of Operative Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, SPBiochemistry Department Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, SPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University-UNESPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University-UNESPCAPES: 001Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bergantin, Bianca Tozi PortaluppeDi Leone, Camilla Cristina LiraCruvinel, ThiagoWang, LindaBuzalaf, Marília Afonso RabeloBorges, Alessandra Buhler [UNESP]Honório, Heitor MarquesRios, Daniela2022-04-29T08:46:30Z2022-04-29T08:46:30Z2022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3Scientific Reports, v. 12, n. 1, 2022.2045-2322http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23160110.1038/s41598-021-03745-32-s2.0-85123125762Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScientific Reportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-29T18:17:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231601Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-29T18:17:11Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
title S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
spellingShingle S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
Bergantin, Bianca Tozi Portaluppe
title_short S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
title_full S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
title_fullStr S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
title_full_unstemmed S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
title_sort S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel
author Bergantin, Bianca Tozi Portaluppe
author_facet Bergantin, Bianca Tozi Portaluppe
Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira
Cruvinel, Thiago
Wang, Linda
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
Borges, Alessandra Buhler [UNESP]
Honório, Heitor Marques
Rios, Daniela
author_role author
author2 Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira
Cruvinel, Thiago
Wang, Linda
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
Borges, Alessandra Buhler [UNESP]
Honório, Heitor Marques
Rios, Daniela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bergantin, Bianca Tozi Portaluppe
Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira
Cruvinel, Thiago
Wang, Linda
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
Borges, Alessandra Buhler [UNESP]
Honório, Heitor Marques
Rios, Daniela
description This study evaluated Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG)-based-composites’ surface resistance against erosive wear and their protective effect on surrounding enamel. Bovine enamel was randomized into 12 groups (n = 10/group) [erosion (e) or erosion + abrasion (a)]: nanohybrid-S-PRG-based composite (SPRGe/SPRGa), nanohybrid-S-PRG-based bulk-fill (SPRGBFe/SPRGBFa), nanoparticle-composite (RCe/RCa), nanohybrid-bulk-fill (BFe/BFa), Glass Hybrid Restorative System (GHRSe/GHRSa), and resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (RMGICe/RMGICa). Cavities were prepared and restored. Initial profile assessment was performed on material and on adjacent enamel at distances of 100, 200, 300, 600, and 700 μm from margin. Specimens were immersed in citric acid (2 min; 6×/day for 5 days) for erosion. Erosion + abrasion groups were brushed for 1 min after erosion. Final profile assessment was performed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey-test showed: for erosion, the GHRSe and RMGICe presented greater material wear compared to the other groups (p = 0.001); up to 300 μm away from restoration, GHRSe and SPRGBFe were able to prevent enamel loss compared to RMGICe and other composite groups (p = 0.001). For erosion + abrasion, none of the materials exhibited a significant protective effect and S-PRG-based groups showed lower wear than RMGICa and GHRSa, and higher wear than composites (p = 0.001). S-PRG-based-composites can diminish surrounding enamel loss only against erosion alone, similarly to GIC, with advantage of being a more resistant material.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29T08:46:30Z
2022-04-29T08:46:30Z
2022-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3
Scientific Reports, v. 12, n. 1, 2022.
2045-2322
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231601
10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3
2-s2.0-85123125762
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231601
identifier_str_mv Scientific Reports, v. 12, n. 1, 2022.
2045-2322
10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3
2-s2.0-85123125762
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Reports
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046955819991040