Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252 |
Resumo: | Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species. |
id |
UNSP_32f268882d795c84566080088ff6a5fb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211252 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergênciaControl of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica by different herbicides applied post-emergenceaquatic plantadjuvantglyphosateimazapyrdiquatplanta aquáticaadjuvanteglyphosateimazapyr, diquatTwo experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species.Foram realizados dois experimentos, com objetivo de avaliar a suscetibilidade de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica a diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pósemergência. Os herbicidas e doses testados foram: glyphosate (Rodeo) a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Aterbane a 0,5% v/v; glyphosate a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Silwet a 0,1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) a 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1; e diquat (Reward) a 400 e 800 g i.a. ha-1 com aplicação seqüencial. Manteve-se uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. As parcelas experimentais foram constituídas de caixas d'água de 60 x 60 x 45 cm, com 55 L de solo. A aplicação foi realizada quando as plantas se encontravam a 45 e 65 cm de altura para B. subquadripara e B. mutica, respectivamente. Foi utilizado um pulverizador costal, a pressão constante de CO2 (2 bars), pontas 110.02 XR, com um consumo de calda de 200 L ha-1. O controle foi avaliado visualmente, através de escala percentual de notas, além de se avaliar a massa seca das plantas. O herbicida glyphosate nas doses de 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1, independentemente do adjuvante testado, proporcionou controle excelente para as duas espécies, porém as parcelas que receberam glyphosate a 2.400 g e.a. ha-1 apresentaram controle apenas satisfatório. O herbicida imazapyr nas doses de 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1 proporcionou controle eficiente para B. subquadripara e excelente para B. mutica. Já o herbicida diquat, apesar de duas aplicações e independentemente da dose utilizada, mostrou-se ineficiente no controle das duas espécies.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasSociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas DaninhasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]Martins, D. [UNESP]Terra, M.a. [UNESP]2021-07-14T10:21:32Z2021-07-14T10:21:32Z2003info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article79-84application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003.0100-83581806-9681http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21125210.1590/S0100-83582003000400011S0100-83582003000400011S0100-83582003000400011.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-05T06:19:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211252Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-05T06:19:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência Control of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica by different herbicides applied post-emergence |
title |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
spellingShingle |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP] aquatic plant adjuvant glyphosate imazapyr diquat planta aquática adjuvante glyphosate imazapyr, diquat |
title_short |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
title_full |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
title_fullStr |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
title_sort |
Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência |
author |
Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP] Martins, D. [UNESP] Terra, M.a. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, D. [UNESP] Terra, M.a. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP] Martins, D. [UNESP] Terra, M.a. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
aquatic plant adjuvant glyphosate imazapyr diquat planta aquática adjuvante glyphosate imazapyr, diquat |
topic |
aquatic plant adjuvant glyphosate imazapyr diquat planta aquática adjuvante glyphosate imazapyr, diquat |
description |
Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003 2021-07-14T10:21:32Z 2021-07-14T10:21:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011 Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003. 0100-8358 1806-9681 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252 10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011 S0100-83582003000400011 S0100-83582003000400011.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252 |
identifier_str_mv |
Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003. 0100-8358 1806-9681 10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011 S0100-83582003000400011 S0100-83582003000400011.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
79-84 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799965181435969536 |