Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Martins, D. [UNESP], Terra, M.a. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252
Resumo: Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species.
id UNSP_32f268882d795c84566080088ff6a5fb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211252
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergênciaControl of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica by different herbicides applied post-emergenceaquatic plantadjuvantglyphosateimazapyrdiquatplanta aquáticaadjuvanteglyphosateimazapyr, diquatTwo experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species.Foram realizados dois experimentos, com objetivo de avaliar a suscetibilidade de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica a diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pósemergência. Os herbicidas e doses testados foram: glyphosate (Rodeo) a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Aterbane a 0,5% v/v; glyphosate a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Silwet a 0,1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) a 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1; e diquat (Reward) a 400 e 800 g i.a. ha-1 com aplicação seqüencial. Manteve-se uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. As parcelas experimentais foram constituídas de caixas d'água de 60 x 60 x 45 cm, com 55 L de solo. A aplicação foi realizada quando as plantas se encontravam a 45 e 65 cm de altura para B. subquadripara e B. mutica, respectivamente. Foi utilizado um pulverizador costal, a pressão constante de CO2 (2 bars), pontas 110.02 XR, com um consumo de calda de 200 L ha-1. O controle foi avaliado visualmente, através de escala percentual de notas, além de se avaliar a massa seca das plantas. O herbicida glyphosate nas doses de 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1, independentemente do adjuvante testado, proporcionou controle excelente para as duas espécies, porém as parcelas que receberam glyphosate a 2.400 g e.a. ha-1 apresentaram controle apenas satisfatório. O herbicida imazapyr nas doses de 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1 proporcionou controle eficiente para B. subquadripara e excelente para B. mutica. Já o herbicida diquat, apesar de duas aplicações e independentemente da dose utilizada, mostrou-se ineficiente no controle das duas espécies.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasSociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas DaninhasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]Martins, D. [UNESP]Terra, M.a. [UNESP]2021-07-14T10:21:32Z2021-07-14T10:21:32Z2003info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article79-84application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003.0100-83581806-9681http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21125210.1590/S0100-83582003000400011S0100-83582003000400011S0100-83582003000400011.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-05T06:19:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211252Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-05T06:19:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
Control of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica by different herbicides applied post-emergence
title Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
spellingShingle Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]
aquatic plant
adjuvant
glyphosate
imazapyr
diquat
planta aquática
adjuvante
glyphosate
imazapyr, diquat
title_short Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
title_full Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
title_fullStr Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
title_full_unstemmed Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
title_sort Controle de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica através de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência
author Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]
author_facet Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]
Martins, D. [UNESP]
Terra, M.a. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Martins, D. [UNESP]
Terra, M.a. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carbonari, C.a. [UNESP]
Martins, D. [UNESP]
Terra, M.a. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aquatic plant
adjuvant
glyphosate
imazapyr
diquat
planta aquática
adjuvante
glyphosate
imazapyr, diquat
topic aquatic plant
adjuvant
glyphosate
imazapyr
diquat
planta aquática
adjuvante
glyphosate
imazapyr, diquat
description Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003
2021-07-14T10:21:32Z
2021-07-14T10:21:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011
Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003.
0100-8358
1806-9681
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252
10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011
S0100-83582003000400011
S0100-83582003000400011.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211252
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, v. 21, n. spe, p. 79-84, 2003.
0100-8358
1806-9681
10.1590/S0100-83582003000400011
S0100-83582003000400011
S0100-83582003000400011.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 79-84
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965181435969536