Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093 |
Resumo: | The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method. |
id |
UNSP_34cb4b44be1e8573207d606a8c107b0c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137093 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolisInfluência da sazonalidade e método de produção na atividade antibacteriana da própolisApicultureBiological propertiesQualityBacteriaApiculturaAtividade biológicaQualidadeBactériaThe antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method.O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a atividade antibacteriana da própolis produzida ao longo do ano por diferentes métodos de coleta (coletor de própolis 'inteligente' - CPI, tela plástica - TP e raspagem convencional - RC) sobre Staphylococcos aureus e Escherichia coli. Foram utilizadas 15 colmeias de Apis mellifera africanizadas. Para o preparo do extrato, foi misturada a própolis produzida mensalmente pela mesma técnica de coleta. O EAP foi preparado na proporção de 30% (30 g de própolis completando o volume para 100 mL com etanol 70%). Para avaliação da atividade biológica do EAP, foram usados dois micro-organismos: uma bactéria gram positivia Staphylococcus aureus e uma gram negativa Escherichia coli, por meio da metodologia de difusão em ágar. Os resultados mostraram que a própolis apresenta atividade antibacteriana, sendo esta influenciada pela sazonalidade e método de colheita utilizado.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 2005/516610Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP]Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP]Veiga, Nabor [UNESP]Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]2016-04-01T18:44:09Z2016-04-01T18:44:09Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article49-53application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014.1807-8672http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13709310.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436S1807-86722014000100007S1807-86722014000100007.pdf1905985872685346Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T13:01:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137093Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T13:01:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis Influência da sazonalidade e método de produção na atividade antibacteriana da própolis |
title |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
spellingShingle |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP] Apiculture Biological properties Quality Bacteria Apicultura Atividade biológica Qualidade Bactéria |
title_short |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
title_full |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
title_fullStr |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
title_sort |
Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis |
author |
Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP] Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP] Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP] Veiga, Nabor [UNESP] Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP] Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP] Veiga, Nabor [UNESP] Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP] Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP] Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP] Veiga, Nabor [UNESP] Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Apiculture Biological properties Quality Bacteria Apicultura Atividade biológica Qualidade Bactéria |
topic |
Apiculture Biological properties Quality Bacteria Apicultura Atividade biológica Qualidade Bactéria |
description |
The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 2016-04-01T18:44:09Z 2016-04-01T18:44:09Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014. 1807-8672 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436 S1807-86722014000100007 S1807-86722014000100007.pdf 1905985872685346 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093 |
identifier_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014. 1807-8672 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436 S1807-86722014000100007 S1807-86722014000100007.pdf 1905985872685346 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
49-53 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Currículo Lattes reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546581784264704 |