Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP], Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP], Veiga, Nabor [UNESP], Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093
Resumo: The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method.
id UNSP_34cb4b44be1e8573207d606a8c107b0c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137093
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolisInfluência da sazonalidade e método de produção na atividade antibacteriana da própolisApicultureBiological propertiesQualityBacteriaApiculturaAtividade biológicaQualidadeBactériaThe antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method.O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a atividade antibacteriana da própolis produzida ao longo do ano por diferentes métodos de coleta (coletor de própolis 'inteligente' - CPI, tela plástica - TP e raspagem convencional - RC) sobre Staphylococcos aureus e Escherichia coli. Foram utilizadas 15 colmeias de Apis mellifera africanizadas. Para o preparo do extrato, foi misturada a própolis produzida mensalmente pela mesma técnica de coleta. O EAP foi preparado na proporção de 30% (30 g de própolis completando o volume para 100 mL com etanol 70%). Para avaliação da atividade biológica do EAP, foram usados dois micro-organismos: uma bactéria gram positivia Staphylococcus aureus e uma gram negativa Escherichia coli, por meio da metodologia de difusão em ágar. Os resultados mostraram que a própolis apresenta atividade antibacteriana, sendo esta influenciada pela sazonalidade e método de colheita utilizado.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 2005/516610Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP]Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP]Veiga, Nabor [UNESP]Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]2016-04-01T18:44:09Z2016-04-01T18:44:09Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article49-53application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014.1807-8672http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13709310.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436S1807-86722014000100007S1807-86722014000100007.pdf1905985872685346Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T13:01:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137093Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T13:01:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
Influência da sazonalidade e método de produção na atividade antibacteriana da própolis
title Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
spellingShingle Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]
Apiculture
Biological properties
Quality
Bacteria
Apicultura
Atividade biológica
Qualidade
Bactéria
title_short Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_full Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_fullStr Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_sort Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
author Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]
author_facet Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]
Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP]
Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP]
Veiga, Nabor [UNESP]
Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP]
Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP]
Veiga, Nabor [UNESP]
Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Edison Antonio de [UNESP]
Inoue, Hemily Tiemi [UNESP]
Fernandes Júnior, Ary [UNESP]
Veiga, Nabor [UNESP]
Orsi, Ricardo De Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apiculture
Biological properties
Quality
Bacteria
Apicultura
Atividade biológica
Qualidade
Bactéria
topic Apiculture
Biological properties
Quality
Bacteria
Apicultura
Atividade biológica
Qualidade
Bactéria
description The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection ('intelligent' collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2016-04-01T18:44:09Z
2016-04-01T18:44:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014.
1807-8672
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093
10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
S1807-86722014000100007
S1807-86722014000100007.pdf
1905985872685346
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137093
identifier_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 36, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2014.
1807-8672
10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
S1807-86722014000100007
S1807-86722014000100007.pdf
1905985872685346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 49-53
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Currículo Lattes
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546581784264704