Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Edison Antonio de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Inoue, Hemily Tiemi, Fernandes Júnior, Ary, Veiga, Nabor, Orsi, Ricardo de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/21436
Resumo: The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection (‘intelligent’ collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method. 
id UEM-7_1fffda55aff7c484de414cd314598ce7
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/21436
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolisapiculturebiological propertiesqualitybacteriaThe antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection (‘intelligent’ collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2014-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpesquisa de campoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2143610.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 36 No 1 (2014); 49-53Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 36 n. 1 (2014); 49-531807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/21436/pdf_9Souza, Edison Antonio deInoue, Hemily TiemiFernandes Júnior, AryVeiga, NaborOrsi, Ricardo de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-17T21:51:49Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/21436Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-02-17T21:51:49Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
spellingShingle Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
Souza, Edison Antonio de
apiculture
biological properties
quality
bacteria
title_short Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_full Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_fullStr Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
title_sort Influence of seasonality and production method on the antibacterial activity of propolis
author Souza, Edison Antonio de
author_facet Souza, Edison Antonio de
Inoue, Hemily Tiemi
Fernandes Júnior, Ary
Veiga, Nabor
Orsi, Ricardo de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Inoue, Hemily Tiemi
Fernandes Júnior, Ary
Veiga, Nabor
Orsi, Ricardo de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Edison Antonio de
Inoue, Hemily Tiemi
Fernandes Júnior, Ary
Veiga, Nabor
Orsi, Ricardo de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv apiculture
biological properties
quality
bacteria
topic apiculture
biological properties
quality
bacteria
description The antibacterial activity of propolis produced throughout the year by different methods of collection (‘intelligent’ collector of propolis - ICP; plastic screen - PC; conventional scraping - CS) on Staphylococcos aureus and Escherichia coli is investigated. Fifteen beehives (five per collector) of Africanized Apis mellifera were used. Monthly produced propolis, with the same collection technique, was mixed for the preparation of the extract. The ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) was prepared at the ratio of 30% (30 g of propolis, completing the volume for 100 mL with ethanol 70%). Two microorganisms, a positive bacterium Gram Staphylococcus aureus and a negative bacterium Gram Escherichia coli, through the methodology of diffusion in agar, were used for the biological activity evaluation of EEP. Results show that propolis presented antibacterial activity, affected by seasonality and by collecting method. 
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
pesquisa de campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/21436
10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/21436
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i1.21436
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/21436/pdf_9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 36 No 1 (2014); 49-53
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 36 n. 1 (2014); 49-53
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315360814465024