Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faleiros, Gabriel Diniz
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP], Conceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP], Corá, José Eduardo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208305
Resumo: Brazil is one of the largest food suppliers in the world. The country faces new challenges to remain competitive considering the dynamism of Brazil´s agribusiness sector, with the need to balance agricultural production with environmental preservation. New technologies that result in sustainable production systems that provide yield gains are necessary. This study aims to economically analyse a conservationist system conducted during 10 consecutive years. The treatments were the combination of summer and winter crops under no-tillage system. The summer crop sequences (sown in October/November) were (i) continuous maize cultivation, (ii) continuous soybean, and (iii) soybean/maize rotation. The winter crops (sown in February/March) were (i) maize, (ii) sunflower, (iii) oilseed radish, (iv) pearl millet, (v) pigeon pea, (vi) grain sorghum, and (vii) sunn hemp, consisting of 21 treatments. An investment analysis was performed based on a discounted cash flow. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) was used to define the discount rate. The data were extrapolated to a typical property of 50 hectares. The results indicate that the yield gain is significant in the conservationist system adopted and superior to that reported in the national average. The minimum attractiveness rate was high for all the treatments. The adoption of soybean and maize rotation, with maize as off-season provided the best economic alternative. The second best alternative is the soybean monoculture with maize as off-season, widely adopted in Brazil for its great agronomic benefit. In conclusion, the investment costs are high, making the small-scale production of soybean and maize not sustainable in the long term. Furthermore, an idleness of the defined machinery and labour capacity was observed. However, the production of maize or sunflower in the off-season resulted in a positive operational cash flow in all treatments.
id UNSP_3d58fb2ca13686d91abae63f24b51893
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208305
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage systemAlternative cropsConservation agricultureFarm managementSoybean. MaizeBrazil is one of the largest food suppliers in the world. The country faces new challenges to remain competitive considering the dynamism of Brazil´s agribusiness sector, with the need to balance agricultural production with environmental preservation. New technologies that result in sustainable production systems that provide yield gains are necessary. This study aims to economically analyse a conservationist system conducted during 10 consecutive years. The treatments were the combination of summer and winter crops under no-tillage system. The summer crop sequences (sown in October/November) were (i) continuous maize cultivation, (ii) continuous soybean, and (iii) soybean/maize rotation. The winter crops (sown in February/March) were (i) maize, (ii) sunflower, (iii) oilseed radish, (iv) pearl millet, (v) pigeon pea, (vi) grain sorghum, and (vii) sunn hemp, consisting of 21 treatments. An investment analysis was performed based on a discounted cash flow. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) was used to define the discount rate. The data were extrapolated to a typical property of 50 hectares. The results indicate that the yield gain is significant in the conservationist system adopted and superior to that reported in the national average. The minimum attractiveness rate was high for all the treatments. The adoption of soybean and maize rotation, with maize as off-season provided the best economic alternative. The second best alternative is the soybean monoculture with maize as off-season, widely adopted in Brazil for its great agronomic benefit. In conclusion, the investment costs are high, making the small-scale production of soybean and maize not sustainable in the long term. Furthermore, an idleness of the defined machinery and labour capacity was observed. However, the production of maize or sunflower in the off-season resulted in a positive operational cash flow in all treatments.Market Analyst at Center for Advanced Studies on Applied Economics (Cepea) University of Sao Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 - CEP 13418-900Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n - CEP 14884-900Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n - CEP 14884-900Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Faleiros, Gabriel DinizSantos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]Conceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP]Corá, José Eduardo [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:09:58Z2021-06-25T11:09:58Z2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article28-56Custos e Agronegocio, v. 16, n. Special Issue, p. 28-56, 2020.1808-2882http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2083052-s2.0-85099138637Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCustos e Agronegocioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T14:22:57Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208305Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:24:59.671837Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
title Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
spellingShingle Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
Faleiros, Gabriel Diniz
Alternative crops
Conservation agriculture
Farm management
Soybean. Maize
title_short Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
title_full Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
title_fullStr Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
title_full_unstemmed Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
title_sort Economic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage system
author Faleiros, Gabriel Diniz
author_facet Faleiros, Gabriel Diniz
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP]
Corá, José Eduardo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP]
Corá, José Eduardo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faleiros, Gabriel Diniz
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP]
Corá, José Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative crops
Conservation agriculture
Farm management
Soybean. Maize
topic Alternative crops
Conservation agriculture
Farm management
Soybean. Maize
description Brazil is one of the largest food suppliers in the world. The country faces new challenges to remain competitive considering the dynamism of Brazil´s agribusiness sector, with the need to balance agricultural production with environmental preservation. New technologies that result in sustainable production systems that provide yield gains are necessary. This study aims to economically analyse a conservationist system conducted during 10 consecutive years. The treatments were the combination of summer and winter crops under no-tillage system. The summer crop sequences (sown in October/November) were (i) continuous maize cultivation, (ii) continuous soybean, and (iii) soybean/maize rotation. The winter crops (sown in February/March) were (i) maize, (ii) sunflower, (iii) oilseed radish, (iv) pearl millet, (v) pigeon pea, (vi) grain sorghum, and (vii) sunn hemp, consisting of 21 treatments. An investment analysis was performed based on a discounted cash flow. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) was used to define the discount rate. The data were extrapolated to a typical property of 50 hectares. The results indicate that the yield gain is significant in the conservationist system adopted and superior to that reported in the national average. The minimum attractiveness rate was high for all the treatments. The adoption of soybean and maize rotation, with maize as off-season provided the best economic alternative. The second best alternative is the soybean monoculture with maize as off-season, widely adopted in Brazil for its great agronomic benefit. In conclusion, the investment costs are high, making the small-scale production of soybean and maize not sustainable in the long term. Furthermore, an idleness of the defined machinery and labour capacity was observed. However, the production of maize or sunflower in the off-season resulted in a positive operational cash flow in all treatments.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-01
2021-06-25T11:09:58Z
2021-06-25T11:09:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio, v. 16, n. Special Issue, p. 28-56, 2020.
1808-2882
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208305
2-s2.0-85099138637
identifier_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio, v. 16, n. Special Issue, p. 28-56, 2020.
1808-2882
2-s2.0-85099138637
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208305
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 28-56
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128358194610176