How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, José Marques, Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira, Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP], Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa, Casagrande, Daniel Rume
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202
Resumo: Pasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production.
id UNSP_40459896ab0bb0053e263b6a5d74edde
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222202
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?Como as características estruturais e morfológicas do dossel, e a composição química da forragem afetam um sistema de produção de leite em pastagem?CynodonForage chemical compositionGrazing managementMegathyrsusUrochloaPasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Estação Experimental de Pecuária do Extremo Sul da Bahia CEPLAC-ESSUL, BADepartment of Agronomy Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz UESC, BACEPLAC/CEPEC, BAUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho UNESP Câmpus Jaboticabal, SPEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA Agrobiologia, RJDepartment of Animal Science Universidade Federal de Lavras UFLA, MGUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho UNESP Câmpus Jaboticabal, SPCEPLAC-ESSULUESCCEPLAC/CEPECUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)de Paula Rezende, CláudiaPereira, José MarquesMagalhães, Albertí FerreiraFerreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]Homem, Bruno Grossi CostaCasagrande, Daniel Rume2022-04-28T19:43:24Z2022-04-28T19:43:24Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3379-3398http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021.1679-03591676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22220210.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p33792-s2.0-85112472380Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSemina:Ciencias Agrariasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:43:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222202Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:17:18.117215Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
Como as características estruturais e morfológicas do dossel, e a composição química da forragem afetam um sistema de produção de leite em pastagem?
title How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
spellingShingle How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
Cynodon
Forage chemical composition
Grazing management
Megathyrsus
Urochloa
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
Cynodon
Forage chemical composition
Grazing management
Megathyrsus
Urochloa
title_short How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
title_full How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
title_fullStr How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
title_full_unstemmed How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
title_sort How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
author de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
author_facet de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
Pereira, José Marques
Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira
Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]
Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa
Casagrande, Daniel Rume
Pereira, José Marques
Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira
Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]
Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa
Casagrande, Daniel Rume
author_role author
author2 Pereira, José Marques
Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira
Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]
Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa
Casagrande, Daniel Rume
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv CEPLAC-ESSUL
UESC
CEPLAC/CEPEC
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Paula Rezende, Cláudia
Pereira, José Marques
Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira
Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]
Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa
Casagrande, Daniel Rume
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cynodon
Forage chemical composition
Grazing management
Megathyrsus
Urochloa
topic Cynodon
Forage chemical composition
Grazing management
Megathyrsus
Urochloa
description Pasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:43:24Z
2022-04-28T19:43:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021.
1679-0359
1676-546X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
2-s2.0-85112472380
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202
identifier_str_mv Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021.
1679-0359
1676-546X
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379
2-s2.0-85112472380
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Semina:Ciencias Agrarias
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 3379-3398
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822182385326751744
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379