How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202 |
Resumo: | Pasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production. |
id |
UNSP_40459896ab0bb0053e263b6a5d74edde |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222202 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?Como as características estruturais e morfológicas do dossel, e a composição química da forragem afetam um sistema de produção de leite em pastagem?CynodonForage chemical compositionGrazing managementMegathyrsusUrochloaPasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Estação Experimental de Pecuária do Extremo Sul da Bahia CEPLAC-ESSUL, BADepartment of Agronomy Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz UESC, BACEPLAC/CEPEC, BAUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho UNESP Câmpus Jaboticabal, SPEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA Agrobiologia, RJDepartment of Animal Science Universidade Federal de Lavras UFLA, MGUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho UNESP Câmpus Jaboticabal, SPCEPLAC-ESSULUESCCEPLAC/CEPECUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)de Paula Rezende, CláudiaPereira, José MarquesMagalhães, Albertí FerreiraFerreira, Igor Machado [UNESP]Homem, Bruno Grossi CostaCasagrande, Daniel Rume2022-04-28T19:43:24Z2022-04-28T19:43:24Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3379-3398http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021.1679-03591676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22220210.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p33792-s2.0-85112472380Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSemina:Ciencias Agrariasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:43:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222202Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:17:18.117215Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? Como as características estruturais e morfológicas do dossel, e a composição química da forragem afetam um sistema de produção de leite em pastagem? |
title |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
spellingShingle |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? de Paula Rezende, Cláudia Cynodon Forage chemical composition Grazing management Megathyrsus Urochloa de Paula Rezende, Cláudia Cynodon Forage chemical composition Grazing management Megathyrsus Urochloa |
title_short |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
title_full |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
title_fullStr |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
title_sort |
How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system? |
author |
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia |
author_facet |
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia de Paula Rezende, Cláudia Pereira, José Marques Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP] Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa Casagrande, Daniel Rume Pereira, José Marques Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP] Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa Casagrande, Daniel Rume |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, José Marques Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP] Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa Casagrande, Daniel Rume |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CEPLAC-ESSUL UESC CEPLAC/CEPEC Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Paula Rezende, Cláudia Pereira, José Marques Magalhães, Albertí Ferreira Ferreira, Igor Machado [UNESP] Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa Casagrande, Daniel Rume |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cynodon Forage chemical composition Grazing management Megathyrsus Urochloa |
topic |
Cynodon Forage chemical composition Grazing management Megathyrsus Urochloa |
description |
Pasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa Guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa Guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:43:24Z 2022-04-28T19:43:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021. 1679-0359 1676-546X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 2-s2.0-85112472380 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222202 |
identifier_str_mv |
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 6, p. 3379-3398, 2021. 1679-0359 1676-546X 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 2-s2.0-85112472380 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
3379-3398 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182385326751744 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379 |