Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Hadad, Henrique [UNESP], Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto, Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363
Resumo: Objective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region.
id UNSP_4225af0cb44c350d791af30f898b31f7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240363
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i OsteotomyLe Fort osteotomymaxillaorthognathic surgeryObjective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of DentistrySchool of Dentistry Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies Hospital (HRAC) São Paulo University (USP)Department of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]Hadad, Henrique [UNESP]Suguimoto, Roberto MacotoMagro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:13:51Z2023-03-01T20:13:51Z2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1255-1259http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022.1536-37321049-2275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24036310.1097/SCS.00000000000081102-s2.0-85133126447Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:13:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240363Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-03-01T20:13:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
title Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
spellingShingle Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]
Le Fort osteotomy
maxilla
orthognathic surgery
title_short Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
title_full Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
title_fullStr Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
title_sort Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
author Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]
author_facet Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]
Hadad, Henrique [UNESP]
Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto
Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Hadad, Henrique [UNESP]
Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto
Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]
Hadad, Henrique [UNESP]
Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto
Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Le Fort osteotomy
maxilla
orthognathic surgery
topic Le Fort osteotomy
maxilla
orthognathic surgery
description Objective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
2023-03-01T20:13:51Z
2023-03-01T20:13:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022.
1536-3732
1049-2275
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363
10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110
2-s2.0-85133126447
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363
identifier_str_mv Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022.
1536-3732
1049-2275
10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110
2-s2.0-85133126447
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1255-1259
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964462621392896