Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363 |
Resumo: | Objective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region. |
id |
UNSP_4225af0cb44c350d791af30f898b31f7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240363 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i OsteotomyLe Fort osteotomymaxillaorthognathic surgeryObjective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of DentistrySchool of Dentistry Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies Hospital (HRAC) São Paulo University (USP)Department of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP]Hadad, Henrique [UNESP]Suguimoto, Roberto MacotoMagro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:13:51Z2023-03-01T20:13:51Z2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1255-1259http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022.1536-37321049-2275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24036310.1097/SCS.00000000000081102-s2.0-85133126447Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:13:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240363Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:12:10.064684Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
title |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
spellingShingle |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP] Le Fort osteotomy maxilla orthognathic surgery |
title_short |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
title_full |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
title_fullStr |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
title_sort |
Mechanical Comparison of Four Different Types of Osteosynthesis in a 11-mm Advancement le Fort i Osteotomy |
author |
Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP] Hadad, Henrique [UNESP] Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hadad, Henrique [UNESP] Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Valthierre Nunes de [UNESP] Hadad, Henrique [UNESP] Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Le Fort osteotomy maxilla orthognathic surgery |
topic |
Le Fort osteotomy maxilla orthognathic surgery |
description |
Objective:This study aimed to evaluate 4 methods of osteosynthesis in the maxilla after a linear advance of 11 mm.Methodology:Le Fort I osteotomies were performed on 24 resin models and different osteosynthesis were applied in the anterior region. Group I received Lindorf plates; group II, modified Lindorf plates; group III, inverted T plates; and group IV, L plates. All groups received L plates in the posterior region. Analysis were performed through universal mechanical testing machine with an axial linear load until 5-mm displacement. The data obtained about the force and the amount of deformation were computed, thus the energy required for displacement and stiffness was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis (Shapiro-Wilk, followed by Holm-Sidak) (P < 0.05).Results:Groups I and II showed greater resistance to displacement (P < 0.05) than the other groups. The largest amount of maximum force exerted for the 5-mm displacement was in group II (91.73 N), followed by group I (87.46 N), presenting the best values in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001). Group III had less stiffness (P < 0.001) than the other groups.Conclusions:The use of preclinical methodologies to verify the mechanical stability of fixation models allows a prediction in the choice of greater resistance systems. The fixation type with greater resistance to deformation was achieved with modified Linford plates followed by Linford plates in the anterior region and plate L bilaterally in the posterior region. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 2023-03-01T20:13:51Z 2023-03-01T20:13:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110 Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022. 1536-3732 1049-2275 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110 2-s2.0-85133126447 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240363 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1255-1259, 2022. 1536-3732 1049-2275 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008110 2-s2.0-85133126447 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1255-1259 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128331159175168 |