Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wilkinson, Thomas J.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Xenophontos, Soteris, Gould, Douglas W., Vogt, Barbara P., Viana, João L., Smith, Alice C., Watson, Emma L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843
Resumo: Physical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention.
id UNSP_442176ac785ab36d0000ddf6eb62510d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170843
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney diseaseChronic kidney diseasesmuscle strengthoutcome assessmentrehabilitationrenal insufficiencywalkingPhysical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention.Leicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Paulo, BrazilSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UKResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University Institute of Maia, ISMAI, Maia, PortugalJohn Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester Trust, Leicester, UKUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Wilkinson, Thomas J.Xenophontos, SoterisGould, Douglas W.Vogt, Barbara P.Viana, João L.Smith, Alice C.Watson, Emma L.2018-12-11T16:52:38Z2018-12-11T16:52:38Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-12application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12.1532-50400959-3985http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17084310.1080/09593985.2018.14552492-s2.0-850445857532-s2.0-85044585753.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice0,525info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-16T06:08:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170843Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:07:46.102528Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
title Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
spellingShingle Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
Wilkinson, Thomas J.
Chronic kidney diseases
muscle strength
outcome assessment
rehabilitation
renal insufficiency
walking
title_short Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
title_full Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
title_sort Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
author Wilkinson, Thomas J.
author_facet Wilkinson, Thomas J.
Xenophontos, Soteris
Gould, Douglas W.
Vogt, Barbara P.
Viana, João L.
Smith, Alice C.
Watson, Emma L.
author_role author
author2 Xenophontos, Soteris
Gould, Douglas W.
Vogt, Barbara P.
Viana, João L.
Smith, Alice C.
Watson, Emma L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wilkinson, Thomas J.
Xenophontos, Soteris
Gould, Douglas W.
Vogt, Barbara P.
Viana, João L.
Smith, Alice C.
Watson, Emma L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronic kidney diseases
muscle strength
outcome assessment
rehabilitation
renal insufficiency
walking
topic Chronic kidney diseases
muscle strength
outcome assessment
rehabilitation
renal insufficiency
walking
description Physical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:52:38Z
2018-12-11T16:52:38Z
2018-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12.
1532-5040
0959-3985
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843
10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249
2-s2.0-85044585753
2-s2.0-85044585753.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843
identifier_str_mv Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12.
1532-5040
0959-3985
10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249
2-s2.0-85044585753
2-s2.0-85044585753.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
0,525
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-12
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128465205985280