Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843 |
Resumo: | Physical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention. |
id |
UNSP_442176ac785ab36d0000ddf6eb62510d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170843 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney diseaseChronic kidney diseasesmuscle strengthoutcome assessmentrehabilitationrenal insufficiencywalkingPhysical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention.Leicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Paulo, BrazilSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UKResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University Institute of Maia, ISMAI, Maia, PortugalJohn Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester Trust, Leicester, UKUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Wilkinson, Thomas J.Xenophontos, SoterisGould, Douglas W.Vogt, Barbara P.Viana, João L.Smith, Alice C.Watson, Emma L.2018-12-11T16:52:38Z2018-12-11T16:52:38Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-12application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12.1532-50400959-3985http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17084310.1080/09593985.2018.14552492-s2.0-850445857532-s2.0-85044585753.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice0,525info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-16T06:08:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170843Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:07:46.102528Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
title |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
spellingShingle |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease Wilkinson, Thomas J. Chronic kidney diseases muscle strength outcome assessment rehabilitation renal insufficiency walking |
title_short |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
title_full |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
title_fullStr |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
title_sort |
Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease |
author |
Wilkinson, Thomas J. |
author_facet |
Wilkinson, Thomas J. Xenophontos, Soteris Gould, Douglas W. Vogt, Barbara P. Viana, João L. Smith, Alice C. Watson, Emma L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Xenophontos, Soteris Gould, Douglas W. Vogt, Barbara P. Viana, João L. Smith, Alice C. Watson, Emma L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wilkinson, Thomas J. Xenophontos, Soteris Gould, Douglas W. Vogt, Barbara P. Viana, João L. Smith, Alice C. Watson, Emma L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chronic kidney diseases muscle strength outcome assessment rehabilitation renal insufficiency walking |
topic |
Chronic kidney diseases muscle strength outcome assessment rehabilitation renal insufficiency walking |
description |
Physical function is an important outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to establish the reliability, validity, and the “minimal detectable change” (MDC) of several common tests used in renal rehabilitation and research. In a repeated measures design, 41 patients with CKD not requiring dialysis (stage 3b to 5) were assessed at an interval of 6 weeks. The tests were the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), “sit-to-stand” (STS) test, estimated 1 repetition maximum for quadriceps strength (e1RM), and VO2peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute reliability by standard error of measurement and MDC. The ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET had “good” to “excellent” reliability (0.973, 0.927, 0.927, and 0.866), respectively. STS-5 reliability was poor (0.676). The MDC is ISWT, 20 m; STS-5, 7.5 s; STS-60, 4 reps; e1RM, 6.4 kg; VO2peak, 2.8 ml/kg/min. There was strong correlation between the ISWT and VO2peak (r = 0.73 and 0.74). While there was poor correlation between the STS-5 and e1RM (r = 0.14 and 0.47), better correlation was seen between STS-5 and ISWT (r = 0.55 and 0.74). In conclusion, the ISWT, STS-60, e1RM, and CPET are reliable tests of function in CKD. The ISWT is a valid means of exercise capacity. The MDC can help researchers and rehabilitation professionals interpret changes following an intervention. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T16:52:38Z 2018-12-11T16:52:38Z 2018-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249 Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12. 1532-5040 0959-3985 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843 10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249 2-s2.0-85044585753 2-s2.0-85044585753.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170843 |
identifier_str_mv |
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, p. 1-12. 1532-5040 0959-3985 10.1080/09593985.2018.1455249 2-s2.0-85044585753 2-s2.0-85044585753.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 0,525 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-12 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128465205985280 |