Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Jardim, Celso Antônio [UNESP], Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP], Yada, Marcela Midori [UNESP], Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi [UNESP], Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP], Filho, Domingos Fornasieri [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200525
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229571
Resumo: The crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization are managements that can affect the common bean technological quality and, consequently, the profitability of producer and the food biological value. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether crop succession and N splitting fertilization promote differences in the technological quality of common bean grains. The experiment was carried out during winter over two agricultural years in southeastern Brazil. A randomized block design was used in a split-plot scheme, with four replications. The plots were composed of three crop successional systems (maize sole, maize + Urochloa ruziziensis, U. ruziziensis sole) and the subplots contained nine combinations of N splitting fertilization at a rate of 90 kg·ha-1 N top-dressing in the phenological stages V3, V4, and R5 of the common bean and a control without fertilization. The evaluated variables were: sieve yield greater than or equal to 12 (SY ≥ 12), crude protein content, cooking time, and hydration ratio. Crop succession promotes differences in the technological quality of common bean; however, the N splitting fertilization did not change the technological attributes of grains. The highest technological quality of common bean was obtained after succession with U. ruziziensis sole, generating large size and crude protein content of grain, followed by the succession with maize + U. ruziziensis intercropping, and finally, the succession with maize sole. Therefore, the crop succession is a fundamental factor for obtaining common bean with higher technological quality, affecting the food biological value and the profitability of producers.
id UNSP_44476db3d943a28e5fc4334fd927206e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229571
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?Cooking timeCrude protein contentIntercroppingPhaseolus vulgaris L.Sieve yieldThe crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization are managements that can affect the common bean technological quality and, consequently, the profitability of producer and the food biological value. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether crop succession and N splitting fertilization promote differences in the technological quality of common bean grains. The experiment was carried out during winter over two agricultural years in southeastern Brazil. A randomized block design was used in a split-plot scheme, with four replications. The plots were composed of three crop successional systems (maize sole, maize + Urochloa ruziziensis, U. ruziziensis sole) and the subplots contained nine combinations of N splitting fertilization at a rate of 90 kg·ha-1 N top-dressing in the phenological stages V3, V4, and R5 of the common bean and a control without fertilization. The evaluated variables were: sieve yield greater than or equal to 12 (SY ≥ 12), crude protein content, cooking time, and hydration ratio. Crop succession promotes differences in the technological quality of common bean; however, the N splitting fertilization did not change the technological attributes of grains. The highest technological quality of common bean was obtained after succession with U. ruziziensis sole, generating large size and crude protein content of grain, followed by the succession with maize + U. ruziziensis intercropping, and finally, the succession with maize sole. Therefore, the crop succession is a fundamental factor for obtaining common bean with higher technological quality, affecting the food biological value and the profitability of producers.Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Ciências da Produção AgrícolaUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências ExatasUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Ciências da Produção AgrícolaUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências ExatasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]Jardim, Celso Antônio [UNESP]Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]Yada, Marcela Midori [UNESP]Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi [UNESP]Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]Filho, Domingos Fornasieri [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:33:16Z2022-04-29T08:33:16Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200525Bragantia, v. 80.1678-44990006-8705http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22957110.1590/1678-4499.202005252-s2.0-85115406158Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBragantiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:33:16Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229571Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-29T08:33:16Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
title Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
spellingShingle Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]
Cooking time
Crude protein content
Intercropping
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sieve yield
title_short Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
title_full Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
title_fullStr Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
title_full_unstemmed Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
title_sort Does crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization change the technological quality of common bean?
author Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]
author_facet Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]
Jardim, Celso Antônio [UNESP]
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Yada, Marcela Midori [UNESP]
Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi [UNESP]
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Filho, Domingos Fornasieri [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Jardim, Celso Antônio [UNESP]
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Yada, Marcela Midori [UNESP]
Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi [UNESP]
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Filho, Domingos Fornasieri [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mingotte, Fábio Luiz Checchio [UNESP]
Jardim, Celso Antônio [UNESP]
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Yada, Marcela Midori [UNESP]
Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi [UNESP]
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Filho, Domingos Fornasieri [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cooking time
Crude protein content
Intercropping
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sieve yield
topic Cooking time
Crude protein content
Intercropping
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sieve yield
description The crop succession and nitrogen splitting fertilization are managements that can affect the common bean technological quality and, consequently, the profitability of producer and the food biological value. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether crop succession and N splitting fertilization promote differences in the technological quality of common bean grains. The experiment was carried out during winter over two agricultural years in southeastern Brazil. A randomized block design was used in a split-plot scheme, with four replications. The plots were composed of three crop successional systems (maize sole, maize + Urochloa ruziziensis, U. ruziziensis sole) and the subplots contained nine combinations of N splitting fertilization at a rate of 90 kg·ha-1 N top-dressing in the phenological stages V3, V4, and R5 of the common bean and a control without fertilization. The evaluated variables were: sieve yield greater than or equal to 12 (SY ≥ 12), crude protein content, cooking time, and hydration ratio. Crop succession promotes differences in the technological quality of common bean; however, the N splitting fertilization did not change the technological attributes of grains. The highest technological quality of common bean was obtained after succession with U. ruziziensis sole, generating large size and crude protein content of grain, followed by the succession with maize + U. ruziziensis intercropping, and finally, the succession with maize sole. Therefore, the crop succession is a fundamental factor for obtaining common bean with higher technological quality, affecting the food biological value and the profitability of producers.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-29T08:33:16Z
2022-04-29T08:33:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200525
Bragantia, v. 80.
1678-4499
0006-8705
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229571
10.1590/1678-4499.20200525
2-s2.0-85115406158
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200525
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229571
identifier_str_mv Bragantia, v. 80.
1678-4499
0006-8705
10.1590/1678-4499.20200525
2-s2.0-85115406158
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bragantia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964944165240832