Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Rosiane P.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Espigolan, Rafael, Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP], Lôbo, Raysildo B., Magnabosco, Cláudio U., Pereira, Angélica S.C., Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle.
id UNSP_46d11728ef1772e2be4efc2666b27b69
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205838
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattleBeef cattleBos taurus indicusGenomic selectionUltrasonography measurementVisual score traitsThe aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle.Departament of Veterinary Medicine College of Animal Science and Food Engineer University of Sao Paulo (USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte AvenueDepartament of Animal Science College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato Castellane s/nNational Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) Jardim America, 463 Joao Godoy StreetBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) Distrito FederalDepartament of Animal Science College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato Castellane s/nUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Jardim AmericaEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Silva, Rosiane P.Espigolan, RafaelBerton, Mariana P. [UNESP]Lôbo, Raysildo B.Magnabosco, Cláudio U.Pereira, Angélica S.C.Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:22:09Z2021-06-25T10:22:09Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421Livestock Science, v. 245.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20583810.1016/j.livsci.2021.1044212-s2.0-85100396641Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T18:26:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205838Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:37:42.568099Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
title Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
spellingShingle Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
Silva, Rosiane P.
Beef cattle
Bos taurus indicus
Genomic selection
Ultrasonography measurement
Visual score traits
title_short Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
title_full Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
title_fullStr Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
title_full_unstemmed Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
title_sort Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
author Silva, Rosiane P.
author_facet Silva, Rosiane P.
Espigolan, Rafael
Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP]
Lôbo, Raysildo B.
Magnabosco, Cláudio U.
Pereira, Angélica S.C.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Espigolan, Rafael
Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP]
Lôbo, Raysildo B.
Magnabosco, Cláudio U.
Pereira, Angélica S.C.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Jardim America
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Rosiane P.
Espigolan, Rafael
Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP]
Lôbo, Raysildo B.
Magnabosco, Cláudio U.
Pereira, Angélica S.C.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beef cattle
Bos taurus indicus
Genomic selection
Ultrasonography measurement
Visual score traits
topic Beef cattle
Bos taurus indicus
Genomic selection
Ultrasonography measurement
Visual score traits
description The aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:22:09Z
2021-06-25T10:22:09Z
2021-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421
Livestock Science, v. 245.
1871-1413
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421
2-s2.0-85100396641
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 245.
1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421
2-s2.0-85100396641
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128679736246272