Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle. |
id |
UNSP_46d11728ef1772e2be4efc2666b27b69 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205838 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattleBeef cattleBos taurus indicusGenomic selectionUltrasonography measurementVisual score traitsThe aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle.Departament of Veterinary Medicine College of Animal Science and Food Engineer University of Sao Paulo (USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte AvenueDepartament of Animal Science College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato Castellane s/nNational Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) Jardim America, 463 Joao Godoy StreetBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) Distrito FederalDepartament of Animal Science College of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato Castellane s/nUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Jardim AmericaEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Silva, Rosiane P.Espigolan, RafaelBerton, Mariana P. [UNESP]Lôbo, Raysildo B.Magnabosco, Cláudio U.Pereira, Angélica S.C.Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:22:09Z2021-06-25T10:22:09Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421Livestock Science, v. 245.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20583810.1016/j.livsci.2021.1044212-s2.0-85100396641Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T18:26:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205838Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:37:42.568099Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
title |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
spellingShingle |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle Silva, Rosiane P. Beef cattle Bos taurus indicus Genomic selection Ultrasonography measurement Visual score traits |
title_short |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
title_full |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
title_fullStr |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
title_sort |
Genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle |
author |
Silva, Rosiane P. |
author_facet |
Silva, Rosiane P. Espigolan, Rafael Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP] Lôbo, Raysildo B. Magnabosco, Cláudio U. Pereira, Angélica S.C. Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Espigolan, Rafael Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP] Lôbo, Raysildo B. Magnabosco, Cláudio U. Pereira, Angélica S.C. Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Jardim America Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Rosiane P. Espigolan, Rafael Berton, Mariana P. [UNESP] Lôbo, Raysildo B. Magnabosco, Cláudio U. Pereira, Angélica S.C. Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beef cattle Bos taurus indicus Genomic selection Ultrasonography measurement Visual score traits |
topic |
Beef cattle Bos taurus indicus Genomic selection Ultrasonography measurement Visual score traits |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare the genomic prediction ability for carcass composition indicator traits in Nellore cattle using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and BayesianLASSO) and an approach combining the pedigree matrix of genotyped animals with both the genomic matrix and Bayesian methods. Phenotypic and genotypic information on about 66,000 and 21,000 animals, respectively, evaluated by National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) were available for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), musculature (MS), Longissimus muscle area (LMA), back fat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF). The genotypes were obtained based on the low-density panel Zoetis CLARIFIDE® Nellore version 3.1 containing 30.754 markers. To obtain the prediction ability, the dataset was split into training (genotyped sires and dams with progenies) and validation (genotyped young animals without progeny records and without phenotypes) subsets. For genomic models, the predictive ability was assessed through the correlation between the deregressed expected progeny differences and DGVs. For BLUP model, the prediction ability was evaluated through the correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) and deregressed expected progeny differences (dEPD). To evaluate the extent of prediction bias the linear regression coefficients between the response variable (dEPD) and DGVs (or EBVs for BLUP model) considering only the animals in the validation set, were calculated. In terms of prediction ability and bias, Bayesian approaches were superior for visual scores traits and the ssGBLUP for carcass traits obtained by ultrasonography, however, more biased results were obtained for BF and RF using the ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP model showed less biased prediction for low heritability traits, such as LMA, and also it has lower computational demand and it is a straightforward method for implementing genomic selection in beef cattle. Therefore, earlier reliable genetic evaluation of unproven sires trough genomic selection is appealing in order to increase the genetic response for carcass traits in the Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) beef cattle. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:22:09Z 2021-06-25T10:22:09Z 2021-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421 Livestock Science, v. 245. 1871-1413 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421 2-s2.0-85100396641 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205838 |
identifier_str_mv |
Livestock Science, v. 245. 1871-1413 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104421 2-s2.0-85100396641 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Livestock Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128679736246272 |