Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Rocha, Eduardo Passos, Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP], Junior, Manoel Martin, Giannini, Marcelo, Reis, André Figueiredo
Tipo de documento: Capítulo de livro
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004
Resumo: Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion.
id UNSP_4a31fe5b511ff3c6a6a4285715c3d0b7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228004
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysisAdhesiveDentinDentin depthDentin tubulesFinite element analysisHybrid layerObjectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPUningá UniversityDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPDivision of Operative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of CampinasDepartment of Operative DentistryDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Uningá UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]Rocha, Eduardo PassosSundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP]Junior, Manoel MartinGiannini, MarceloReis, André Figueiredo2022-04-29T07:26:18Z2022-04-29T07:26:18Z2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart197-208Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2280042-s2.0-84934783667Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Dentistry Research Compendiuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T18:32:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228004Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T18:32:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
title Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
spellingShingle Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
Adhesive
Dentin
Dentin depth
Dentin tubules
Finite element analysis
Hybrid layer
title_short Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
title_full Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
title_fullStr Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
title_sort Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
author Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
author_facet Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
Rocha, Eduardo Passos
Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP]
Junior, Manoel Martin
Giannini, Marcelo
Reis, André Figueiredo
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Eduardo Passos
Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP]
Junior, Manoel Martin
Giannini, Marcelo
Reis, André Figueiredo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Uningá University
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
Rocha, Eduardo Passos
Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP]
Junior, Manoel Martin
Giannini, Marcelo
Reis, André Figueiredo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesive
Dentin
Dentin depth
Dentin tubules
Finite element analysis
Hybrid layer
topic Adhesive
Dentin
Dentin depth
Dentin tubules
Finite element analysis
Hybrid layer
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
2022-04-29T07:26:18Z
2022-04-29T07:26:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004
2-s2.0-84934783667
identifier_str_mv Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208.
2-s2.0-84934783667
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 197-208
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546450648301568