Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Capítulo de livro |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004 |
Resumo: | Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion. |
id |
UNSP_4a31fe5b511ff3c6a6a4285715c3d0b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228004 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysisAdhesiveDentinDentin depthDentin tubulesFinite element analysisHybrid layerObjectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPUningá UniversityDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPDivision of Operative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of CampinasDepartment of Operative DentistryDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba School of Dentistry -UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Uningá UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]Rocha, Eduardo PassosSundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP]Junior, Manoel MartinGiannini, MarceloReis, André Figueiredo2022-04-29T07:26:18Z2022-04-29T07:26:18Z2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart197-208Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2280042-s2.0-84934783667Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Dentistry Research Compendiuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T18:32:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228004Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T18:32:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
title |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
spellingShingle |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP] Adhesive Dentin Dentin depth Dentin tubules Finite element analysis Hybrid layer |
title_short |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
title_full |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
title_fullStr |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
title_sort |
Micromechanics of dentin /adhesive interface in function of dentin depth: 3D finite element analysis |
author |
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP] Rocha, Eduardo Passos Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP] Junior, Manoel Martin Giannini, Marcelo Reis, André Figueiredo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Eduardo Passos Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP] Junior, Manoel Martin Giannini, Marcelo Reis, André Figueiredo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Uningá University Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP] Rocha, Eduardo Passos Sundfeld, Renato Herman [UNESP] Junior, Manoel Martin Giannini, Marcelo Reis, André Figueiredo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesive Dentin Dentin depth Dentin tubules Finite element analysis Hybrid layer |
topic |
Adhesive Dentin Dentin depth Dentin tubules Finite element analysis Hybrid layer |
description |
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on dentin/adhesive interface (d/a) through a 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) varying the number and diameter of the dentin tubules orifice according to dentin depth, keeping hybrid layer (HL) thickness and TAG's length constant. Materials and Methods: 3 models were built through the SolidWorks software: SD - specimen simulating superficial dentin (41 x 41 x 82 μm), with a 3 μm thick HL, a 17 μm length Tag, and 8 tubules with a 0.9 μm diameter restored with composite resin. MD - similar to M1 with 12 tubules with a 1.2 μm diameter, simulating medium dentin. DD - similar to M1 with 16 tubules with a 2.5 μm diameter, simulating deep dentin. Other two models were built in order to keep the diameter constant in 2.5 μm: MS - similar to SD with 8 tubules; and MM - similar to MD with 12 tubules. The boundary condition was applied to the base surface of each specimen. Tensile load (0.03N) was performed on the composite resin top surface. Stress field (maximum principal stress in tension - σMAX) was performed using Ansys Wokbench 10.0. Results: The peak of σMAX (MPa) were similar between SD (110) and MD (106), and higher for DD (134). The stress distribution pathway was similar for all models, starting from peritubular dentin to adhesive layer, intertubular dentin and hybrid layer. The peak of σMAX (MPa) for those structures was, respectively: 134 (DD), 56.9 (SD), 45.5 (DD), and 36.7 (MD). Conclusions: The number of dentin tubules had no influence in the σMAX at the dentin/adhesive interface. Peritubular and intertubular dentin showed higher stress with the bigger dentin tubules orifice condition. The σMAX in the hybrid layer and adhesive layer were going down from superficial dentin to deeper dentin. In a failure scenario, the hybrid layer in contact with peritubular dentin and adhesive layer is the first region for breaking the adhesion. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01 2022-04-29T07:26:18Z 2022-04-29T07:26:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart |
format |
bookPart |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004 2-s2.0-84934783667 |
identifier_str_mv |
Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 197-208. 2-s2.0-84934783667 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Dentistry Research Compendium |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
197-208 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546450648301568 |