Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288 |
Resumo: | Elephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion. |
id |
UNSP_4a7c5693e7b82c6cef09a987a8b62f6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170288 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol productionBiomass fractionsElephant grassEnzymatic hydrolysisLignocellulosicPretreatmentRecalcitranceElephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion.Laboratory of Microscopy Applied to Life Science – Lamav National Institute of Metrology Quality and Technology – InmetroLaboratory of Cellular Ultrastructure Hertha Meyer Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – UFRJBioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Quality and Technology – InmetroUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Santos, Chayenne Correiade Souza, WanderleySant Anna, CelsoBrienzo, Michel [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:50:07Z2018-12-11T16:50:07Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article193-200application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200.0926-6690http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17028810.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.0132-s2.0-850317521262-s2.0-85031752126.pdf8251885707409794Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIndustrial Crops and Products1,091info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-02T06:17:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170288Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:54:21.500416Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
title |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
spellingShingle |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production Santos, Chayenne Correia Biomass fractions Elephant grass Enzymatic hydrolysis Lignocellulosic Pretreatment Recalcitrance |
title_short |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
title_full |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
title_fullStr |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
title_sort |
Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production |
author |
Santos, Chayenne Correia |
author_facet |
Santos, Chayenne Correia de Souza, Wanderley Sant Anna, Celso Brienzo, Michel [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Souza, Wanderley Sant Anna, Celso Brienzo, Michel [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality and Technology – Inmetro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Chayenne Correia de Souza, Wanderley Sant Anna, Celso Brienzo, Michel [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biomass fractions Elephant grass Enzymatic hydrolysis Lignocellulosic Pretreatment Recalcitrance |
topic |
Biomass fractions Elephant grass Enzymatic hydrolysis Lignocellulosic Pretreatment Recalcitrance |
description |
Elephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T16:50:07Z 2018-12-11T16:50:07Z 2018-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013 Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200. 0926-6690 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013 2-s2.0-85031752126 2-s2.0-85031752126.pdf 8251885707409794 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288 |
identifier_str_mv |
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200. 0926-6690 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013 2-s2.0-85031752126 2-s2.0-85031752126.pdf 8251885707409794 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Industrial Crops and Products 1,091 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
193-200 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129371999830016 |