Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Chayenne Correia
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: de Souza, Wanderley, Sant Anna, Celso, Brienzo, Michel [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288
Resumo: Elephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion.
id UNSP_4a7c5693e7b82c6cef09a987a8b62f6d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170288
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol productionBiomass fractionsElephant grassEnzymatic hydrolysisLignocellulosicPretreatmentRecalcitranceElephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion.Laboratory of Microscopy Applied to Life Science – Lamav National Institute of Metrology Quality and Technology – InmetroLaboratory of Cellular Ultrastructure Hertha Meyer Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – UFRJBioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Quality and Technology – InmetroUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Santos, Chayenne Correiade Souza, WanderleySant Anna, CelsoBrienzo, Michel [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:50:07Z2018-12-11T16:50:07Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article193-200application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200.0926-6690http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17028810.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.0132-s2.0-850317521262-s2.0-85031752126.pdf8251885707409794Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIndustrial Crops and Products1,091info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-02T06:17:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170288Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:54:21.500416Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
title Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
spellingShingle Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
Santos, Chayenne Correia
Biomass fractions
Elephant grass
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Lignocellulosic
Pretreatment
Recalcitrance
title_short Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
title_full Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
title_fullStr Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
title_full_unstemmed Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
title_sort Elephant grass leaves have lower recalcitrance to acid pretreatment than stems, with higher potential for ethanol production
author Santos, Chayenne Correia
author_facet Santos, Chayenne Correia
de Souza, Wanderley
Sant Anna, Celso
Brienzo, Michel [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 de Souza, Wanderley
Sant Anna, Celso
Brienzo, Michel [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Quality and Technology – Inmetro
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Chayenne Correia
de Souza, Wanderley
Sant Anna, Celso
Brienzo, Michel [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomass fractions
Elephant grass
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Lignocellulosic
Pretreatment
Recalcitrance
topic Biomass fractions
Elephant grass
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Lignocellulosic
Pretreatment
Recalcitrance
description Elephant grass is gaining attention among lignocellulosic materials due to its high growth potential, biomass yield, limited requirement for cultivation land and high rates of carbon dioxide absorption. Here was investigate the effect of pretreatment with different concentrations (5, 10 and 20%, mass acid/mass material) of diluted sulfuric acid on the whole elephant grass plant compared with its leaf and stem fractions. The stem was the most recalcitrant fraction, judging from the high recovery of water insoluble solids (WIS) and lower enzymatic hydrolysis yield, upon acid pretreatment. In enzymatic hydrolysis assays, the glucose yield increased with increasing concentrations of acid, reaching maximum values of 89.20 (leaf), 43.54 (stem) and 76.01% (whole plant). The crystallinity index (CrI) increased in both elephant grass fractions, which correlated with the solubilization of amorphous materials such as hemicellulose. Also, the stem fraction had a slightly higher heating value than the leaf fraction (3958.45 and 3939.49 cal/g, respectively). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed drastic morphological changes in the samples with increasing pretreatment severity, although the stem fraction suffered less structural damage than other materials. Taken together, the results suggest that the separation of elephant grass in different fractions decreases biomass heterogeneity and generates a fraction (leaf) with lower inherent recalcitrance and, thus, higher susceptibility to pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the efficiency of fermentable sugar release. The results indicate that the leaf fraction of elephant grass has higher potential for use in second-generation ethanol production, while the stem fraction may be more useful for energy co-generation by combustion.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:50:07Z
2018-12-11T16:50:07Z
2018-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200.
0926-6690
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288
10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013
2-s2.0-85031752126
2-s2.0-85031752126.pdf
8251885707409794
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170288
identifier_str_mv Industrial Crops and Products, v. 111, p. 193-200.
0926-6690
10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.013
2-s2.0-85031752126
2-s2.0-85031752126.pdf
8251885707409794
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Industrial Crops and Products
1,091
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 193-200
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129371999830016