Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vital, Flávia Maria Ribeiro, Bernabé, Daniel Galera [UNESP], Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230605
Resumo: Purpose: Radiation therapy can affect normal tissues in patients with breast cancer, causing adverse effects such as fibrosis. Although there are several interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis, the efficacy of these procedures is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer. Methods and Materials: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Studies that compared any intervention for fibrosis to another intervention, placebo, or no intervention were included. Outcomes assessed were fibrosis, adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, pain, and functionality. Results: A total of 2501 publications were found, and 7 studies were selected because they met the inclusion criteria. The interventions for fibrosis were pentoxifylline and vitamin E, grape seed extract, kinesiotherapy, and endermotherapy. The results showed great heterogeneity in the treatment protocols for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer and in their evaluation metrics. The meta-analyses showed no benefit in using pentoxifylline and vitamin E compared with placebo or no intervention (standardized mean difference: −0.30; 95% confidence interval, −0.79 to 0.20; P = .24 [very low evidence]) compared with placebo and vitamin E (standardized mean difference: −0.09; 95% confidence interval, −0.66 to 0.49; P = .77 [moderate evidence]), respectively, assessed by the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force–Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scoring scale. Conclusions: The effectiveness of these interventions for the treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer could not be determined. Although isolated studies show significant results favorable to the experimental groups, caution should be exercised in these findings because of the small number, small sample size, and high risk of bias presented by some of the included studies, which makes the recommendation for clinical practice still weak.
id UNSP_4c465aeb483c54ea9c0c8c711f154cc4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230605
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysesPurpose: Radiation therapy can affect normal tissues in patients with breast cancer, causing adverse effects such as fibrosis. Although there are several interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis, the efficacy of these procedures is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer. Methods and Materials: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Studies that compared any intervention for fibrosis to another intervention, placebo, or no intervention were included. Outcomes assessed were fibrosis, adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, pain, and functionality. Results: A total of 2501 publications were found, and 7 studies were selected because they met the inclusion criteria. The interventions for fibrosis were pentoxifylline and vitamin E, grape seed extract, kinesiotherapy, and endermotherapy. The results showed great heterogeneity in the treatment protocols for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer and in their evaluation metrics. The meta-analyses showed no benefit in using pentoxifylline and vitamin E compared with placebo or no intervention (standardized mean difference: −0.30; 95% confidence interval, −0.79 to 0.20; P = .24 [very low evidence]) compared with placebo and vitamin E (standardized mean difference: −0.09; 95% confidence interval, −0.66 to 0.49; P = .77 [moderate evidence]), respectively, assessed by the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force–Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scoring scale. Conclusions: The effectiveness of these interventions for the treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer could not be determined. Although isolated studies show significant results favorable to the experimental groups, caution should be exercised in these findings because of the small number, small sample size, and high risk of bias presented by some of the included studies, which makes the recommendation for clinical practice still weak.Oral Oncology Center School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, São PauloUniversity of São Paulo, São PauloVital Knowledge Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Minas GeraisHospital Heliópolis, São PauloOral Oncology Center School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de JaneiroHospital HeliópolisNogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]Vital, Flávia Maria RibeiroBernabé, Daniel Galera [UNESP]Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino de2022-04-29T08:41:09Z2022-04-29T08:41:09Z2022-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912Advances in Radiation Oncology, v. 7, n. 3, 2022.2452-1094http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23060510.1016/j.adro.2022.1009122-s2.0-85126640528Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAdvances in Radiation Oncologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-11T20:16:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230605Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:02:13.104586Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
title Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
spellingShingle Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
Nogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]
title_short Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
title_full Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
title_fullStr Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
title_sort Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
author Nogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]
author_facet Nogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]
Vital, Flávia Maria Ribeiro
Bernabé, Daniel Galera [UNESP]
Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino de
author_role author
author2 Vital, Flávia Maria Ribeiro
Bernabé, Daniel Galera [UNESP]
Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Hospital Heliópolis
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nogueira, Regiane Mazzarioli Pereira [UNESP]
Vital, Flávia Maria Ribeiro
Bernabé, Daniel Galera [UNESP]
Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino de
description Purpose: Radiation therapy can affect normal tissues in patients with breast cancer, causing adverse effects such as fibrosis. Although there are several interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis, the efficacy of these procedures is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of interventions for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer. Methods and Materials: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Studies that compared any intervention for fibrosis to another intervention, placebo, or no intervention were included. Outcomes assessed were fibrosis, adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, pain, and functionality. Results: A total of 2501 publications were found, and 7 studies were selected because they met the inclusion criteria. The interventions for fibrosis were pentoxifylline and vitamin E, grape seed extract, kinesiotherapy, and endermotherapy. The results showed great heterogeneity in the treatment protocols for radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer and in their evaluation metrics. The meta-analyses showed no benefit in using pentoxifylline and vitamin E compared with placebo or no intervention (standardized mean difference: −0.30; 95% confidence interval, −0.79 to 0.20; P = .24 [very low evidence]) compared with placebo and vitamin E (standardized mean difference: −0.09; 95% confidence interval, −0.66 to 0.49; P = .77 [moderate evidence]), respectively, assessed by the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force–Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scoring scale. Conclusions: The effectiveness of these interventions for the treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer could not be determined. Although isolated studies show significant results favorable to the experimental groups, caution should be exercised in these findings because of the small number, small sample size, and high risk of bias presented by some of the included studies, which makes the recommendation for clinical practice still weak.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29T08:41:09Z
2022-04-29T08:41:09Z
2022-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
Advances in Radiation Oncology, v. 7, n. 3, 2022.
2452-1094
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230605
10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
2-s2.0-85126640528
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230605
identifier_str_mv Advances in Radiation Oncology, v. 7, n. 3, 2022.
2452-1094
10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
2-s2.0-85126640528
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Advances in Radiation Oncology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129574850002944