Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP], Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi, De Fendi, Ligia Issa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198764
Resumo: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) versus whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in early breast cancer. Methods and Materials: Eligible randomized clinical trials were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through December 2019. A meta-analysis for local recurrence (LR), overall mortality (OM), and non-breast cancer mortality (NBCM) was conducted. When possible, the outcomes were calculated for 5, 7, and 10 years of followup. A subgroup analysis by PBI technique (brachytherapy [BT], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT], and mixed) was performed. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 14,436 patients (7186 PBI vs. 7250 WBRT) were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for LR in 5 y was 1.46 (95% CI 1.15–2, p = 0.024) for PBI. In the subgroup analysis, no significant difference for LR was observed between PBI and WBRT using BT (p = 0.51), EBRT (p = 0.25), or mixed techniques (p = 0.89). The only subgroup with statistical difference was IORT 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–7.6, p = 0.014). No significant difference in LR was observed with 7 and 10 years among the groups. The OM had no difference at 5, 7, and 10 years of followup for any subgroup. A nonsignificant difference was observed comparing PBI with WBRT for NBCM OR = 1.24 (95% CI 0.98–1.57, p = 0.07). The rates of cardiac death, contralateral breast cancer, and development of second tumor were not significant. Conclusions: The LR with PBI is low and similar to WBRT in selected early breast cancer with a longer followup. The subgroup analysis detected a significant difference for LR associated with IORT and no significant difference for BT and EBRT. Our results confirm a nonsignificant difference for OM and NBCM between PBI and WBRT.
id UNSP_cb2f0c485c1815fc8fe746bc1ae7cf81
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198764
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysisBreast cancerMeta-analysisPartial-breast irradiationWhole-breast radiotherapyPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) versus whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in early breast cancer. Methods and Materials: Eligible randomized clinical trials were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through December 2019. A meta-analysis for local recurrence (LR), overall mortality (OM), and non-breast cancer mortality (NBCM) was conducted. When possible, the outcomes were calculated for 5, 7, and 10 years of followup. A subgroup analysis by PBI technique (brachytherapy [BT], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT], and mixed) was performed. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 14,436 patients (7186 PBI vs. 7250 WBRT) were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for LR in 5 y was 1.46 (95% CI 1.15–2, p = 0.024) for PBI. In the subgroup analysis, no significant difference for LR was observed between PBI and WBRT using BT (p = 0.51), EBRT (p = 0.25), or mixed techniques (p = 0.89). The only subgroup with statistical difference was IORT 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–7.6, p = 0.014). No significant difference in LR was observed with 7 and 10 years among the groups. The OM had no difference at 5, 7, and 10 years of followup for any subgroup. A nonsignificant difference was observed comparing PBI with WBRT for NBCM OR = 1.24 (95% CI 0.98–1.57, p = 0.07). The rates of cardiac death, contralateral breast cancer, and development of second tumor were not significant. Conclusions: The LR with PBI is low and similar to WBRT in selected early breast cancer with a longer followup. The subgroup analysis detected a significant difference for LR associated with IORT and no significant difference for BT and EBRT. Our results confirm a nonsignificant difference for OM and NBCM between PBI and WBRT.Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP)Bioscience Institute of University of State from Sao Paulo (UNESP)Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoBioscience Institute of University of State from Sao Paulo (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoViani, Gustavo ArrudaArruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]Faustino, Alexandre CiufiDe Fendi, Ligia Issa2020-12-12T01:21:27Z2020-12-12T01:21:27Z2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article491-498http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003Brachytherapy, v. 19, n. 4, p. 491-498, 2020.1873-14491538-4721http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19876410.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.0032-s2.0-85083718052Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrachytherapyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:11:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198764Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:11:19.765609Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
title Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
spellingShingle Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Breast cancer
Meta-analysis
Partial-breast irradiation
Whole-breast radiotherapy
title_short Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
title_full Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
title_fullStr Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
title_sort Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A systematic review and update meta-analysis
author Viani, Gustavo Arruda
author_facet Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
author_role author
author2 Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast cancer
Meta-analysis
Partial-breast irradiation
Whole-breast radiotherapy
topic Breast cancer
Meta-analysis
Partial-breast irradiation
Whole-breast radiotherapy
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) versus whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in early breast cancer. Methods and Materials: Eligible randomized clinical trials were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through December 2019. A meta-analysis for local recurrence (LR), overall mortality (OM), and non-breast cancer mortality (NBCM) was conducted. When possible, the outcomes were calculated for 5, 7, and 10 years of followup. A subgroup analysis by PBI technique (brachytherapy [BT], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT], and mixed) was performed. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 14,436 patients (7186 PBI vs. 7250 WBRT) were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for LR in 5 y was 1.46 (95% CI 1.15–2, p = 0.024) for PBI. In the subgroup analysis, no significant difference for LR was observed between PBI and WBRT using BT (p = 0.51), EBRT (p = 0.25), or mixed techniques (p = 0.89). The only subgroup with statistical difference was IORT 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–7.6, p = 0.014). No significant difference in LR was observed with 7 and 10 years among the groups. The OM had no difference at 5, 7, and 10 years of followup for any subgroup. A nonsignificant difference was observed comparing PBI with WBRT for NBCM OR = 1.24 (95% CI 0.98–1.57, p = 0.07). The rates of cardiac death, contralateral breast cancer, and development of second tumor were not significant. Conclusions: The LR with PBI is low and similar to WBRT in selected early breast cancer with a longer followup. The subgroup analysis detected a significant difference for LR associated with IORT and no significant difference for BT and EBRT. Our results confirm a nonsignificant difference for OM and NBCM between PBI and WBRT.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:21:27Z
2020-12-12T01:21:27Z
2020-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003
Brachytherapy, v. 19, n. 4, p. 491-498, 2020.
1873-1449
1538-4721
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198764
10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003
2-s2.0-85083718052
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198764
identifier_str_mv Brachytherapy, v. 19, n. 4, p. 491-498, 2020.
1873-1449
1538-4721
10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.003
2-s2.0-85083718052
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brachytherapy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 491-498
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128329095577600