Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231474 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is characterized by epiphora starting in the first two weeks after birth, representing 90% of the causes of epiphora in childhood. The purpose of this article is to provide information about the main aspects of this important entity. Method: This is an extensive database search, including articles about causes of epiphora in newborns, clinical diagnosis, types and treatments of CNLDO, exploring conservative (massage and antibiotics), or invasive treatment (probing, intubation, balloon catheter dilatation, dacryocystorhinostomy) as well the use of adjuvant treatment. Results: Despite the many controversies related to the CNLDO treatment, the decisions must be based on the natural history of the affection, type of obstruction, and clinical manifestation. Recognizing the types of obstruction (simples or complex) can facilitate choosing the adequate treatment. Nasal endoscopy is the most important tool for CNLDO diagnosis and management, mainly in complex cases, highlighting the variants of CNLDO, optimizing management to achieve better success rates. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children can also provide a very good outcome. Conclusion: Simple CNLDO can have a spontaneous resolution or evolve to cure with a massage. However, complex CNLDO must have more attention. Endoscopy can document the efficacy of sondage and provide the opportunity to treat associated nasal alterations detected during the procedure, improving the outcome. |
id |
UNSP_4c5bed1429067c38a9db5e6ae485e82d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231474 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructionscongenital obstructiondiagnosisNasolacrimal duct obstructionreview articletreatmentIntroduction: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is characterized by epiphora starting in the first two weeks after birth, representing 90% of the causes of epiphora in childhood. The purpose of this article is to provide information about the main aspects of this important entity. Method: This is an extensive database search, including articles about causes of epiphora in newborns, clinical diagnosis, types and treatments of CNLDO, exploring conservative (massage and antibiotics), or invasive treatment (probing, intubation, balloon catheter dilatation, dacryocystorhinostomy) as well the use of adjuvant treatment. Results: Despite the many controversies related to the CNLDO treatment, the decisions must be based on the natural history of the affection, type of obstruction, and clinical manifestation. Recognizing the types of obstruction (simples or complex) can facilitate choosing the adequate treatment. Nasal endoscopy is the most important tool for CNLDO diagnosis and management, mainly in complex cases, highlighting the variants of CNLDO, optimizing management to achieve better success rates. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children can also provide a very good outcome. Conclusion: Simple CNLDO can have a spontaneous resolution or evolve to cure with a massage. However, complex CNLDO must have more attention. Endoscopy can document the efficacy of sondage and provide the opportunity to treat associated nasal alterations detected during the procedure, improving the outcome.Department of Ophthalmology Medical School State University of Sao PauloDepartment of Ophthalmology Rio Hortega University HospitalUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Rio Hortega University HospitalSchellini, Silvana ArtioliMarques-Fernandez, VictoriaMeneghim, Roberta Lilian Fernandes SousaGalindo-Ferreiro, Alicia2022-04-29T08:45:35Z2022-04-29T08:45:35Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article377-385http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923Expert Review of Ophthalmology, v. 16, n. 5, p. 377-385, 2021.1746-99021746-9899http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23147410.1080/17469899.2021.19459232-s2.0-85109740603Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengExpert Review of Ophthalmologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T18:43:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231474Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T18:43:28Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
title |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
spellingShingle |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions Schellini, Silvana Artioli congenital obstruction diagnosis Nasolacrimal duct obstruction review article treatment |
title_short |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
title_full |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
title_fullStr |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
title_sort |
Current management strategies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions |
author |
Schellini, Silvana Artioli |
author_facet |
Schellini, Silvana Artioli Marques-Fernandez, Victoria Meneghim, Roberta Lilian Fernandes Sousa Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques-Fernandez, Victoria Meneghim, Roberta Lilian Fernandes Sousa Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Rio Hortega University Hospital |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schellini, Silvana Artioli Marques-Fernandez, Victoria Meneghim, Roberta Lilian Fernandes Sousa Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
congenital obstruction diagnosis Nasolacrimal duct obstruction review article treatment |
topic |
congenital obstruction diagnosis Nasolacrimal duct obstruction review article treatment |
description |
Introduction: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is characterized by epiphora starting in the first two weeks after birth, representing 90% of the causes of epiphora in childhood. The purpose of this article is to provide information about the main aspects of this important entity. Method: This is an extensive database search, including articles about causes of epiphora in newborns, clinical diagnosis, types and treatments of CNLDO, exploring conservative (massage and antibiotics), or invasive treatment (probing, intubation, balloon catheter dilatation, dacryocystorhinostomy) as well the use of adjuvant treatment. Results: Despite the many controversies related to the CNLDO treatment, the decisions must be based on the natural history of the affection, type of obstruction, and clinical manifestation. Recognizing the types of obstruction (simples or complex) can facilitate choosing the adequate treatment. Nasal endoscopy is the most important tool for CNLDO diagnosis and management, mainly in complex cases, highlighting the variants of CNLDO, optimizing management to achieve better success rates. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children can also provide a very good outcome. Conclusion: Simple CNLDO can have a spontaneous resolution or evolve to cure with a massage. However, complex CNLDO must have more attention. Endoscopy can document the efficacy of sondage and provide the opportunity to treat associated nasal alterations detected during the procedure, improving the outcome. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-29T08:45:35Z 2022-04-29T08:45:35Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923 Expert Review of Ophthalmology, v. 16, n. 5, p. 377-385, 2021. 1746-9902 1746-9899 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231474 10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923 2-s2.0-85109740603 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231474 |
identifier_str_mv |
Expert Review of Ophthalmology, v. 16, n. 5, p. 377-385, 2021. 1746-9902 1746-9899 10.1080/17469899.2021.1945923 2-s2.0-85109740603 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Expert Review of Ophthalmology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
377-385 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128100115939328 |