Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Avila, D. M. S. [UNESP], Goncalves, L. L. [UNESP], Meirelles, L. C. F. [UNESP], Mailart, M. C. [UNESP], Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP], Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-029-C
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218723
Resumo: Objective: This split-mouth clinical study investigated the effect of luting cement on the performance of veneered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) zirconia crowns. Methods and Materials: A total of 60 crowns prepared with Y-TZP coping and press-on porcelain were made with a split-mouth design in 30 participants. The crowns were cemented either with glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Meron, Voco) or with self-adhesive resin cement (Bifix-SE, Voco). The restorations were assessed immediately after treatment and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The parameters analyzed were retention, color stability, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, anatomic form, and secondary caries. The differences between the groups were analyzed by the Fisher exact test in each period of evaluation. The survival rate was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier and logrank test (alpha=0.05). Results: After 48 months, 20 participants attended the recall. During the period of evaluation, 1 crown cemented with glass ionomer cement and 1 crown cemented with resin cement lost retention. Color match, marginal discoloration and adaptation, surface roughness, and anatomic form did not change in any of the periods evaluated, and no secondary caries was observed. No significant differences were found between the 2 luting cements for any of the clinical parameters analyzed, nor for the survival rates during the study. Conclusions: The type of cement did not influence the performance of the crowns after 48 months of clinical use. Both cements resulted in adequate retention rates, aesthetic and functional outcomes, and biological response.
id UNSP_4e8d97c5b7a0fbeb93a091aafd6bd8f4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218723
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain CrownsObjective: This split-mouth clinical study investigated the effect of luting cement on the performance of veneered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) zirconia crowns. Methods and Materials: A total of 60 crowns prepared with Y-TZP coping and press-on porcelain were made with a split-mouth design in 30 participants. The crowns were cemented either with glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Meron, Voco) or with self-adhesive resin cement (Bifix-SE, Voco). The restorations were assessed immediately after treatment and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The parameters analyzed were retention, color stability, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, anatomic form, and secondary caries. The differences between the groups were analyzed by the Fisher exact test in each period of evaluation. The survival rate was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier and logrank test (alpha=0.05). Results: After 48 months, 20 participants attended the recall. During the period of evaluation, 1 crown cemented with glass ionomer cement and 1 crown cemented with resin cement lost retention. Color match, marginal discoloration and adaptation, surface roughness, and anatomic form did not change in any of the periods evaluated, and no secondary caries was observed. No significant differences were found between the 2 luting cements for any of the clinical parameters analyzed, nor for the survival rates during the study. Conclusions: The type of cement did not influence the performance of the crowns after 48 months of clinical use. Both cements resulted in adequate retention rates, aesthetic and functional outcomes, and biological response.Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilOperative Dentistry IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]Avila, D. M. S. [UNESP]Goncalves, L. L. [UNESP]Meirelles, L. C. F. [UNESP]Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP]Borges, A. B. [UNESP]2022-04-28T17:22:39Z2022-04-28T17:22:39Z2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article362-373http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-029-COperative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 4, p. 362-373, 2021.0361-7734http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21872310.2341/20-029-CWOS:000726697400002Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOperative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T17:22:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218723Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:53:08.282332Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
title Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
spellingShingle Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
title_short Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
title_full Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
title_fullStr Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
title_full_unstemmed Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
title_sort Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns
author Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
author_facet Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
Avila, D. M. S. [UNESP]
Goncalves, L. L. [UNESP]
Meirelles, L. C. F. [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP]
Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Avila, D. M. S. [UNESP]
Goncalves, L. L. [UNESP]
Meirelles, L. C. F. [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP]
Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
Avila, D. M. S. [UNESP]
Goncalves, L. L. [UNESP]
Meirelles, L. C. F. [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP]
Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
description Objective: This split-mouth clinical study investigated the effect of luting cement on the performance of veneered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) zirconia crowns. Methods and Materials: A total of 60 crowns prepared with Y-TZP coping and press-on porcelain were made with a split-mouth design in 30 participants. The crowns were cemented either with glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Meron, Voco) or with self-adhesive resin cement (Bifix-SE, Voco). The restorations were assessed immediately after treatment and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The parameters analyzed were retention, color stability, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, anatomic form, and secondary caries. The differences between the groups were analyzed by the Fisher exact test in each period of evaluation. The survival rate was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier and logrank test (alpha=0.05). Results: After 48 months, 20 participants attended the recall. During the period of evaluation, 1 crown cemented with glass ionomer cement and 1 crown cemented with resin cement lost retention. Color match, marginal discoloration and adaptation, surface roughness, and anatomic form did not change in any of the periods evaluated, and no secondary caries was observed. No significant differences were found between the 2 luting cements for any of the clinical parameters analyzed, nor for the survival rates during the study. Conclusions: The type of cement did not influence the performance of the crowns after 48 months of clinical use. Both cements resulted in adequate retention rates, aesthetic and functional outcomes, and biological response.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-01
2022-04-28T17:22:39Z
2022-04-28T17:22:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-029-C
Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 4, p. 362-373, 2021.
0361-7734
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218723
10.2341/20-029-C
WOS:000726697400002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-029-C
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218723
identifier_str_mv Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 4, p. 362-373, 2021.
0361-7734
10.2341/20-029-C
WOS:000726697400002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 362-373
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128286341988352