Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds. |
id |
UNSP_4f35d37510e0f4b74a4ac42d49382c8a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199440 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behaviorhuman-animal relationshippoultrypre-slaughter handlingstockpersonThe aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds.UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Zootecnia Programa de Pós-graduação em ZootecniaGrupo ETCO Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia AnimalSwine Teaching and Research Center Department of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center School of Veterinary Medicine University of PennsylvaniaRoyal Veterinary College University of LondonUNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Zootecnia Programa de Pós-graduação em ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia AnimalUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of LondonDe Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]Ceballos, Maria CamilaGregory, Neville G.Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:39:49Z2020-12-12T01:39:49Z2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4282-4289http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019.1525-31710032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19944010.3382/ps/pez2842-s2.0-85072509788Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:41:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:55:16.256580Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
title |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP] human-animal relationship poultry pre-slaughter handling stockperson |
title_short |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
title_full |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
title_sort |
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior |
author |
De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP] |
author_facet |
De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP] Ceballos, Maria Camila Gregory, Neville G. Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ceballos, Maria Camila Gregory, Neville G. Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia Animal University of Pennsylvania University of London |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP] Ceballos, Maria Camila Gregory, Neville G. Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
human-animal relationship poultry pre-slaughter handling stockperson |
topic |
human-animal relationship poultry pre-slaughter handling stockperson |
description |
The aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 2020-12-12T01:39:49Z 2020-12-12T01:39:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284 Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019. 1525-3171 0032-5791 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440 10.3382/ps/pez284 2-s2.0-85072509788 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440 |
identifier_str_mv |
Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019. 1525-3171 0032-5791 10.3382/ps/pez284 2-s2.0-85072509788 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Poultry Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
4282-4289 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128875698323456 |