Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ceballos, Maria Camila, Gregory, Neville G., Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440
Resumo: The aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds.
id UNSP_4f35d37510e0f4b74a4ac42d49382c8a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199440
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behaviorhuman-animal relationshippoultrypre-slaughter handlingstockpersonThe aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds.UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Zootecnia Programa de Pós-graduação em ZootecniaGrupo ETCO Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia AnimalSwine Teaching and Research Center Department of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center School of Veterinary Medicine University of PennsylvaniaRoyal Veterinary College University of LondonUNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Zootecnia Programa de Pós-graduação em ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia AnimalUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of LondonDe Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]Ceballos, Maria CamilaGregory, Neville G.Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:39:49Z2020-12-12T01:39:49Z2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4282-4289http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019.1525-31710032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19944010.3382/ps/pez2842-s2.0-85072509788Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:41:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:55:16.256580Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
title Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
spellingShingle Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]
human-animal relationship
poultry
pre-slaughter handling
stockperson
title_short Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
title_full Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
title_fullStr Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
title_sort Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior
author De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]
author_facet De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]
Ceballos, Maria Camila
Gregory, Neville G.
Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ceballos, Maria Camila
Gregory, Neville G.
Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Etologia e Ecologia Animal
University of Pennsylvania
University of London
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Lima, Victor Abreu [UNESP]
Ceballos, Maria Camila
Gregory, Neville G.
Da Costa, Mateus J. R. Paranhos [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv human-animal relationship
poultry
pre-slaughter handling
stockperson
topic human-animal relationship
poultry
pre-slaughter handling
stockperson
description The aim of this study was to identify the influence of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Catching was examined in a total of 4,595 Cobb broilers with average live weight of 3.2 kg and 42 days old. Six catching practices were evaluated: shed curtain position, loading time, catching method, catching team, height of the crates from the floor, and placement of the bird in the crate. Behavioral welfare indicators were defined as follows: 1) broiler agitation in the catcher's hands, measured when the birds flapped their wings, kicked, or wriggled in the hands; 2) broiler striking the crate entrance as it was being placed in the crate, measured when the birds get the head, wings, or legs, hit at the crate entrance; and 3) broiler agitation in the crate, measured when birds flapped the wings or jumped inside the crate for 3 s or more after placement in the crate. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of occurrence of each behavioral welfare indicator due to the handling factors. All catching practices evaluated in the present study influenced the birds' welfare and behavior. Thus, some procedures during broiler catching potentially improved their behavior, making them less prone to accidents, and consequently improved their welfare. The catching process should be performed with the curtains in the closed position, carrying one broiler per catcher in an upright position while containing its wings, carefully placing the birds inside the crates, and with the crates being positioned at a height of at least 21 cm from the ground. Additionally, it was concluded that more attention should be given to the broiler catchers, since the position of the curtain, loading time, and position of the crate during handling can influence the work done by them, affecting the welfare and behavior of both humans and birds.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
2020-12-12T01:39:49Z
2020-12-12T01:39:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284
Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019.
1525-3171
0032-5791
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440
10.3382/ps/pez284
2-s2.0-85072509788
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez284
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199440
identifier_str_mv Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4282-4289, 2019.
1525-3171
0032-5791
10.3382/ps/pez284
2-s2.0-85072509788
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Poultry Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 4282-4289
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128875698323456