Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Roth, M. T.P.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Resende, F. D. [UNESP], Oliveira, I. M., Fernandes, R. M. [UNESP], Custódio, L. [UNESP], Siqueira, G. R. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170092
Resumo: In Brazil, the beef cattle are widely raised in pasture post weaning, but the supplementation has been studied only in individual phases of the animal's growth curve. Therefore, the objective of this study was evaluated the nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in the performance of Nellore bulls. Eighty-four weaned calves (body weight [BW] = 205 ± 4.7 kg; 8 months) raised on pasture during the growing phase (dry season, summer and autumn) and finished in feedlot were used. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included 1) two supplements levels in the dry season (protein [1 g/kg BW/day - PR1] or protein-energy [3 g/kg BW/day - PE] supplement); 2) two supplement levels in summer (mineral supplement [ad libitum - MS] or protein supplement [1 g/kg BW/day - PR2]); and three supplement levels in autumn (MS, PR2 or PE). The animals were finished with a common diet. The dry season supplementation affected the average daily gain (ADG) in the summer (P < 0.05). In summer, animals fed MS had a greater ADG when fed PR1 in the previous (dry) season than those receiving PE (0.696 vs. 0.581 kg, P < 0.01); while, no difference in ADG was observed when the animals received PR2 (0.815 kg, P = 0.99). In autumn, animals fed PR2 in the previous (summer) season exhibited 11.3% lower ADG than those supplemented with MS (0.503 vs. 0.567 kg, P < 0.01), regardless of the autumn supplementation. Dry season supplementation did not affect the ADG during finishing phase (0.909 kg, P = 0.14). The animals fed PR2 in the summer and PE in the autumn had tendency of lower ADG during the feedlot (P = 0.06) compared with animals fed MS, however, they were finished 20 days earlier (P = 0.06). In conclusion, to provide PE in the dry season, followed by MS in the summer is not recommended, because this strategy reduces the ADG. In addition, dry season supplementation does not affect the ADG during finishing phase, while supply supplements of greater nutritional value in autumn reduces feedlot period.
id UNSP_4fe53e31be574e312900cfdccab8ddf8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170092
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?Bos IndicusEnergyNutritional strategiesProteinTropical grassIn Brazil, the beef cattle are widely raised in pasture post weaning, but the supplementation has been studied only in individual phases of the animal's growth curve. Therefore, the objective of this study was evaluated the nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in the performance of Nellore bulls. Eighty-four weaned calves (body weight [BW] = 205 ± 4.7 kg; 8 months) raised on pasture during the growing phase (dry season, summer and autumn) and finished in feedlot were used. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included 1) two supplements levels in the dry season (protein [1 g/kg BW/day - PR1] or protein-energy [3 g/kg BW/day - PE] supplement); 2) two supplement levels in summer (mineral supplement [ad libitum - MS] or protein supplement [1 g/kg BW/day - PR2]); and three supplement levels in autumn (MS, PR2 or PE). The animals were finished with a common diet. The dry season supplementation affected the average daily gain (ADG) in the summer (P < 0.05). In summer, animals fed MS had a greater ADG when fed PR1 in the previous (dry) season than those receiving PE (0.696 vs. 0.581 kg, P < 0.01); while, no difference in ADG was observed when the animals received PR2 (0.815 kg, P = 0.99). In autumn, animals fed PR2 in the previous (summer) season exhibited 11.3% lower ADG than those supplemented with MS (0.503 vs. 0.567 kg, P < 0.01), regardless of the autumn supplementation. Dry season supplementation did not affect the ADG during finishing phase (0.909 kg, P = 0.14). The animals fed PR2 in the summer and PE in the autumn had tendency of lower ADG during the feedlot (P = 0.06) compared with animals fed MS, however, they were finished 20 days earlier (P = 0.06). In conclusion, to provide PE in the dry season, followed by MS in the summer is not recommended, because this strategy reduces the ADG. In addition, dry season supplementation does not affect the ADG during finishing phase, while supply supplements of greater nutritional value in autumn reduces feedlot period.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNIFEB-Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional de BarretosAPTA - Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUNESP - Univ. Estadual PaulistaUNESP - Univ. Estadual PaulistaFAPESP: #2011/02937-4FAPESP: #2013/10340-3FAPESP: #2016/01961-2UNIFEB-Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional de BarretosAPTA - Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Roth, M. T.P.Resende, F. D. [UNESP]Oliveira, I. M.Fernandes, R. M. [UNESP]Custódio, L. [UNESP]Siqueira, G. R. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:49:13Z2018-12-11T16:49:13Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article122-128application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019Livestock Science, v. 204, p. 122-128.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17009210.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.0192-s2.0-850286945682-s2.0-85028694568.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Science0,730info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-06T06:16:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170092Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:36:07.921629Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
title Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
spellingShingle Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
Roth, M. T.P.
Bos Indicus
Energy
Nutritional strategies
Protein
Tropical grass
title_short Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
title_full Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
title_fullStr Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
title_full_unstemmed Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
title_sort Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?
author Roth, M. T.P.
author_facet Roth, M. T.P.
Resende, F. D. [UNESP]
Oliveira, I. M.
Fernandes, R. M. [UNESP]
Custódio, L. [UNESP]
Siqueira, G. R. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Resende, F. D. [UNESP]
Oliveira, I. M.
Fernandes, R. M. [UNESP]
Custódio, L. [UNESP]
Siqueira, G. R. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UNIFEB-Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional de Barretos
APTA - Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Roth, M. T.P.
Resende, F. D. [UNESP]
Oliveira, I. M.
Fernandes, R. M. [UNESP]
Custódio, L. [UNESP]
Siqueira, G. R. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bos Indicus
Energy
Nutritional strategies
Protein
Tropical grass
topic Bos Indicus
Energy
Nutritional strategies
Protein
Tropical grass
description In Brazil, the beef cattle are widely raised in pasture post weaning, but the supplementation has been studied only in individual phases of the animal's growth curve. Therefore, the objective of this study was evaluated the nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in the performance of Nellore bulls. Eighty-four weaned calves (body weight [BW] = 205 ± 4.7 kg; 8 months) raised on pasture during the growing phase (dry season, summer and autumn) and finished in feedlot were used. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included 1) two supplements levels in the dry season (protein [1 g/kg BW/day - PR1] or protein-energy [3 g/kg BW/day - PE] supplement); 2) two supplement levels in summer (mineral supplement [ad libitum - MS] or protein supplement [1 g/kg BW/day - PR2]); and three supplement levels in autumn (MS, PR2 or PE). The animals were finished with a common diet. The dry season supplementation affected the average daily gain (ADG) in the summer (P < 0.05). In summer, animals fed MS had a greater ADG when fed PR1 in the previous (dry) season than those receiving PE (0.696 vs. 0.581 kg, P < 0.01); while, no difference in ADG was observed when the animals received PR2 (0.815 kg, P = 0.99). In autumn, animals fed PR2 in the previous (summer) season exhibited 11.3% lower ADG than those supplemented with MS (0.503 vs. 0.567 kg, P < 0.01), regardless of the autumn supplementation. Dry season supplementation did not affect the ADG during finishing phase (0.909 kg, P = 0.14). The animals fed PR2 in the summer and PE in the autumn had tendency of lower ADG during the feedlot (P = 0.06) compared with animals fed MS, however, they were finished 20 days earlier (P = 0.06). In conclusion, to provide PE in the dry season, followed by MS in the summer is not recommended, because this strategy reduces the ADG. In addition, dry season supplementation does not affect the ADG during finishing phase, while supply supplements of greater nutritional value in autumn reduces feedlot period.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
2018-12-11T16:49:13Z
2018-12-11T16:49:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019
Livestock Science, v. 204, p. 122-128.
1871-1413
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170092
10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019
2-s2.0-85028694568
2-s2.0-85028694568.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170092
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 204, p. 122-128.
1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.019
2-s2.0-85028694568
2-s2.0-85028694568.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
0,730
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 122-128
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129094504677376