Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Komiyama, C M [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Mendes, Ariel Antonio [UNESP], Takahashi, S E [UNESP], Moreira, J, Garcia, R G, Sanfelice, C [UNESP], Borba, H S [UNESP], Leonel, F R [UNESP], Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida [UNESP], Balog, A [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14245
Resumo: This study aimed at evaluating the effect of different fasting periods and water spray during lairage on the quality of chicken meat. A number of 300 male Ross broilers were reared up to 42 days of age, and submitted to four pre-slaughter fasting periods (4, 8, 12, and 16 hours) and sprayed with water or not during lairage. Deboned breast meat was submitted to the following analysis: pH, color, drip loss, water retention capacity, cooking loss, and shear force. There was a significant effect (p < 0.05) of fasting period on meat luminosity was significantly different, with the highest value obtained for 4-hour fasting, whereas no difference was found among the other fasting periods. Meat pH values were different among fasting periods when birds received water spray, with birds fasted for 4, 8, and 12 hours of fasting presenting lower meat pH values (5.87, 5.87, and 6.04, respectively). The interaction between fasting period and water spray influenced meat drip loss and cooking loss, with birds fasted for 16h and not receiving water spray presenting higher drip loss (4.88) and higher cooking loss (28.24) as compared to the other birds. Fasting period affects meat quality, and very short periods (4h) impair meat quality.
id UNSP_52d21ef77a523f6e6c57e3ab272db046
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/14245
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water sprayBroilerscolormeatpHThis study aimed at evaluating the effect of different fasting periods and water spray during lairage on the quality of chicken meat. A number of 300 male Ross broilers were reared up to 42 days of age, and submitted to four pre-slaughter fasting periods (4, 8, 12, and 16 hours) and sprayed with water or not during lairage. Deboned breast meat was submitted to the following analysis: pH, color, drip loss, water retention capacity, cooking loss, and shear force. There was a significant effect (p < 0.05) of fasting period on meat luminosity was significantly different, with the highest value obtained for 4-hour fasting, whereas no difference was found among the other fasting periods. Meat pH values were different among fasting periods when birds received water spray, with birds fasted for 4, 8, and 12 hours of fasting presenting lower meat pH values (5.87, 5.87, and 6.04, respectively). The interaction between fasting period and water spray influenced meat drip loss and cooking loss, with birds fasted for 16h and not receiving water spray presenting higher drip loss (4.88) and higher cooking loss (28.24) as compared to the other birds. Fasting period affects meat quality, and very short periods (4h) impair meat quality.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNESP School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal ScienceFederal University of DiamantinaFederal University of Grande DouradosUNESP School of Agrarian and Veterinary ScienceUNESP School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Animal ProductionUNESP School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal ScienceUNESP School of Agrarian and Veterinary ScienceUNESP School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Animal ProductionFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of DiamantinaFederal University of Grande DouradosKomiyama, C M [UNESP]Mendes, Ariel Antonio [UNESP]Takahashi, S E [UNESP]Moreira, JGarcia, R GSanfelice, C [UNESP]Borba, H S [UNESP]Leonel, F R [UNESP]Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida [UNESP]Balog, A [UNESP]2013-09-30T19:25:31Z2014-05-20T13:41:05Z2013-09-30T19:25:31Z2014-05-20T13:41:05Z2008-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article179-183application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 10, n. 3, p. 179-183, 2008.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/1424510.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008S1516-635X2008000300008WOS:000261863100008S1516-635X2008000300008.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T13:01:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/14245Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T13:01:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
title Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
spellingShingle Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
Komiyama, C M [UNESP]
Broilers
color
meat
pH
title_short Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
title_full Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
title_fullStr Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
title_full_unstemmed Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
title_sort Chicken meat quality as a function of fasting period and water spray
author Komiyama, C M [UNESP]
author_facet Komiyama, C M [UNESP]
Mendes, Ariel Antonio [UNESP]
Takahashi, S E [UNESP]
Moreira, J
Garcia, R G
Sanfelice, C [UNESP]
Borba, H S [UNESP]
Leonel, F R [UNESP]
Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida [UNESP]
Balog, A [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Mendes, Ariel Antonio [UNESP]
Takahashi, S E [UNESP]
Moreira, J
Garcia, R G
Sanfelice, C [UNESP]
Borba, H S [UNESP]
Leonel, F R [UNESP]
Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida [UNESP]
Balog, A [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Federal University of Diamantina
Federal University of Grande Dourados
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Komiyama, C M [UNESP]
Mendes, Ariel Antonio [UNESP]
Takahashi, S E [UNESP]
Moreira, J
Garcia, R G
Sanfelice, C [UNESP]
Borba, H S [UNESP]
Leonel, F R [UNESP]
Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida [UNESP]
Balog, A [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broilers
color
meat
pH
topic Broilers
color
meat
pH
description This study aimed at evaluating the effect of different fasting periods and water spray during lairage on the quality of chicken meat. A number of 300 male Ross broilers were reared up to 42 days of age, and submitted to four pre-slaughter fasting periods (4, 8, 12, and 16 hours) and sprayed with water or not during lairage. Deboned breast meat was submitted to the following analysis: pH, color, drip loss, water retention capacity, cooking loss, and shear force. There was a significant effect (p < 0.05) of fasting period on meat luminosity was significantly different, with the highest value obtained for 4-hour fasting, whereas no difference was found among the other fasting periods. Meat pH values were different among fasting periods when birds received water spray, with birds fasted for 4, 8, and 12 hours of fasting presenting lower meat pH values (5.87, 5.87, and 6.04, respectively). The interaction between fasting period and water spray influenced meat drip loss and cooking loss, with birds fasted for 16h and not receiving water spray presenting higher drip loss (4.88) and higher cooking loss (28.24) as compared to the other birds. Fasting period affects meat quality, and very short periods (4h) impair meat quality.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-09-01
2013-09-30T19:25:31Z
2013-09-30T19:25:31Z
2014-05-20T13:41:05Z
2014-05-20T13:41:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 10, n. 3, p. 179-183, 2008.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14245
10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008
S1516-635X2008000300008
WOS:000261863100008
S1516-635X2008000300008.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14245
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 10, n. 3, p. 179-183, 2008.
1516-635X
10.1590/S1516-635X2008000300008
S1516-635X2008000300008
WOS:000261863100008
S1516-635X2008000300008.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola
0.463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 179-183
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021327217623040