Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Souza, PA de [UNESP], Souza, HBA de [UNESP], Oba, A [UNESP], Norkus, EA [UNESP], Kodawara, LM [UNESP], Lima, TMA de [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4181
Resumo: The present work evaluated the effect of different probiotics on carcass and meat quality of broilers. One thousand and fifty male Cobb chicks were distributed at one day of age in a randomized design with 3 x 2 + 1 factorial arrangement (3 probiotics, 2 levels of probiotics in drinking water and 1 negative control group), using 5 replications with 30 birds. Carcass yield was higher (p<0.05) in control birds. Nevertheless, the groups fed with probiotics showed higher (p<0.01) leg yield at 45 days of age. There was a significant decrease in color (lightness) and increase in pH of breast muscle 5 hours after slaughter in the probiotics treated birds. In the sensory analysis, meat flavor and general aspect 72 hours after slaughter were better when probiotics were added in both water and diet. There were no differences in water holding capacity, cooking loss and shearing force among different probiotics or between them and the control. Thus, meat quality was better when probiotics were fed in the water and diet instead of only in the diet. Nevertheless, carcass and meat quality showed no alteration when the control group was compared to birds fed with probiotics, except for leg yield improvement in the latter.
id UNSP_a024e3e9ec4cf9c7151d798ec0e46444
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/4181
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat qualityBroilersCarcass yieldMeat qualityorganoleptic characteristicsprobioticsThe present work evaluated the effect of different probiotics on carcass and meat quality of broilers. One thousand and fifty male Cobb chicks were distributed at one day of age in a randomized design with 3 x 2 + 1 factorial arrangement (3 probiotics, 2 levels of probiotics in drinking water and 1 negative control group), using 5 replications with 30 birds. Carcass yield was higher (p<0.05) in control birds. Nevertheless, the groups fed with probiotics showed higher (p<0.01) leg yield at 45 days of age. There was a significant decrease in color (lightness) and increase in pH of breast muscle 5 hours after slaughter in the probiotics treated birds. In the sensory analysis, meat flavor and general aspect 72 hours after slaughter were better when probiotics were added in both water and diet. There were no differences in water holding capacity, cooking loss and shearing force among different probiotics or between them and the control. Thus, meat quality was better when probiotics were fed in the water and diet instead of only in the diet. Nevertheless, carcass and meat quality showed no alteration when the control group was compared to birds fed with probiotics, except for leg yield improvement in the latter.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Unesp Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de TecnologiaUnesp Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de TecnologiaFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]Souza, PA de [UNESP]Souza, HBA de [UNESP]Oba, A [UNESP]Norkus, EA [UNESP]Kodawara, LM [UNESP]Lima, TMA de [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:17:54Z2014-05-20T13:17:54Z2003-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article207-214application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 5, n. 3, p. 207-214, 2003.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/418110.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009S1516-635X2003000300009S1516-635X2003000300009.pdf3756802878031727SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T06:08:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/4181Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-09T06:08:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
title Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
spellingShingle Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]
Broilers
Carcass yield
Meat quality
organoleptic characteristics
probiotics
title_short Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
title_full Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
title_fullStr Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
title_sort Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
author Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]
author_facet Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]
Souza, PA de [UNESP]
Souza, HBA de [UNESP]
Oba, A [UNESP]
Norkus, EA [UNESP]
Kodawara, LM [UNESP]
Lima, TMA de [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Souza, PA de [UNESP]
Souza, HBA de [UNESP]
Oba, A [UNESP]
Norkus, EA [UNESP]
Kodawara, LM [UNESP]
Lima, TMA de [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]
Souza, PA de [UNESP]
Souza, HBA de [UNESP]
Oba, A [UNESP]
Norkus, EA [UNESP]
Kodawara, LM [UNESP]
Lima, TMA de [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broilers
Carcass yield
Meat quality
organoleptic characteristics
probiotics
topic Broilers
Carcass yield
Meat quality
organoleptic characteristics
probiotics
description The present work evaluated the effect of different probiotics on carcass and meat quality of broilers. One thousand and fifty male Cobb chicks were distributed at one day of age in a randomized design with 3 x 2 + 1 factorial arrangement (3 probiotics, 2 levels of probiotics in drinking water and 1 negative control group), using 5 replications with 30 birds. Carcass yield was higher (p<0.05) in control birds. Nevertheless, the groups fed with probiotics showed higher (p<0.01) leg yield at 45 days of age. There was a significant decrease in color (lightness) and increase in pH of breast muscle 5 hours after slaughter in the probiotics treated birds. In the sensory analysis, meat flavor and general aspect 72 hours after slaughter were better when probiotics were added in both water and diet. There were no differences in water holding capacity, cooking loss and shearing force among different probiotics or between them and the control. Thus, meat quality was better when probiotics were fed in the water and diet instead of only in the diet. Nevertheless, carcass and meat quality showed no alteration when the control group was compared to birds fed with probiotics, except for leg yield improvement in the latter.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-12-01
2014-05-20T13:17:54Z
2014-05-20T13:17:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 5, n. 3, p. 207-214, 2003.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4181
10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009
S1516-635X2003000300009
S1516-635X2003000300009.pdf
3756802878031727
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4181
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 5, n. 3, p. 207-214, 2003.
1516-635X
10.1590/S1516-635X2003000300009
S1516-635X2003000300009
S1516-635X2003000300009.pdf
3756802878031727
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola
0.463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 207-214
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789652806008832