Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172624 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study is to assess the effect of different dental implant designs, bone type, loading, and surface treatment on the stress distribution around the implant by using the 3D finite-element method. Twelve 3D models were developed with Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 4.0, and Solidworks 2010 software. The analysis was processed using the FEMAP 10.2 and NeiNastran 10.0 software. The applied oblique forces were 200 N and 100 N. The results were analyzed using maps of maximum principal stress and bone microstrain. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. The results showed that the Morse taper design was most efficient in terms of its distribution of stresses (p < 0.05); the external hexagon with platform switching did not show a significant difference from an external hexagon with a standard platform (p > 0.05). The different bone types did not show a significant difference in the stress/strain distribution (p > 0.05). The surface treatment increased areas of stress concentration under axial loading (p < 0.05) and increased areas of microstrain under axial and oblique loading (p < 0.05) on the cortical bone. The Morse taper design behaved better biomechanically in relation to the bone tissue. The treated surface increased areas of stress and strain on the cortical bone tissue. |
id |
UNSP_52de44e45699f071319f8dc01ba4909f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172624 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone typesDental implant designFinite element analysisSurface treatmentsThe aim of this study is to assess the effect of different dental implant designs, bone type, loading, and surface treatment on the stress distribution around the implant by using the 3D finite-element method. Twelve 3D models were developed with Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 4.0, and Solidworks 2010 software. The analysis was processed using the FEMAP 10.2 and NeiNastran 10.0 software. The applied oblique forces were 200 N and 100 N. The results were analyzed using maps of maximum principal stress and bone microstrain. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. The results showed that the Morse taper design was most efficient in terms of its distribution of stresses (p < 0.05); the external hexagon with platform switching did not show a significant difference from an external hexagon with a standard platform (p > 0.05). The different bone types did not show a significant difference in the stress/strain distribution (p > 0.05). The surface treatment increased areas of stress concentration under axial loading (p < 0.05) and increased areas of microstrain under axial and oblique loading (p < 0.05) on the cortical bone. The Morse taper design behaved better biomechanically in relation to the bone tissue. The treated surface increased areas of stress and strain on the cortical bone tissue.Department of Health Sciences University of Sacred Heart USC, 10-50 Irmã Arminda, Jardim BrasilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, Vila MendoncaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, 1193 Jose Bonifacio Street, Vila MendoncaUSCUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Santiago, Joel FerreiraVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]Almeida, Daniel Augusto De Faria [UNESP]De Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo [UNESP]Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo [UNESP]Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:01:29Z2018-12-11T17:01:29Z2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article292-300application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 63, p. 292-300.0928-4931http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17262410.1016/j.msec.2016.02.0612-s2.0-849595015462-s2.0-84959501546.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMaterials Science and Engineering C1,110info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-17T06:20:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172624Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-17T06:20:34Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
title |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
spellingShingle |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types Santiago, Joel Ferreira Dental implant design Finite element analysis Surface treatments |
title_short |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
title_full |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
title_fullStr |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
title_full_unstemmed |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
title_sort |
Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types |
author |
Santiago, Joel Ferreira |
author_facet |
Santiago, Joel Ferreira Verri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP] Almeida, Daniel Augusto De Faria [UNESP] De Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo [UNESP] Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo [UNESP] Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Verri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP] Almeida, Daniel Augusto De Faria [UNESP] De Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo [UNESP] Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo [UNESP] Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
USC Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Joel Ferreira Verri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP] Almeida, Daniel Augusto De Faria [UNESP] De Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo [UNESP] Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo [UNESP] Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implant design Finite element analysis Surface treatments |
topic |
Dental implant design Finite element analysis Surface treatments |
description |
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of different dental implant designs, bone type, loading, and surface treatment on the stress distribution around the implant by using the 3D finite-element method. Twelve 3D models were developed with Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 4.0, and Solidworks 2010 software. The analysis was processed using the FEMAP 10.2 and NeiNastran 10.0 software. The applied oblique forces were 200 N and 100 N. The results were analyzed using maps of maximum principal stress and bone microstrain. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. The results showed that the Morse taper design was most efficient in terms of its distribution of stresses (p < 0.05); the external hexagon with platform switching did not show a significant difference from an external hexagon with a standard platform (p > 0.05). The different bone types did not show a significant difference in the stress/strain distribution (p > 0.05). The surface treatment increased areas of stress concentration under axial loading (p < 0.05) and increased areas of microstrain under axial and oblique loading (p < 0.05) on the cortical bone. The Morse taper design behaved better biomechanically in relation to the bone tissue. The treated surface increased areas of stress and strain on the cortical bone tissue. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 2018-12-11T17:01:29Z 2018-12-11T17:01:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061 Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 63, p. 292-300. 0928-4931 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172624 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061 2-s2.0-84959501546 2-s2.0-84959501546.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172624 |
identifier_str_mv |
Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 63, p. 292-300. 0928-4931 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061 2-s2.0-84959501546 2-s2.0-84959501546.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Materials Science and Engineering C 1,110 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
292-300 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803046990976647168 |