Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Débora Tamanaha
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Nascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP], da Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP], Moura, Amanda Oliveira, Costa, Priscila Cristina, do Amaral, Alexandre Bicalho, Peres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martins, de Fátima Carrijo, Kênia, Cossi, Marcus Vinícius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14882
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223358
Resumo: Introduction: Smaller scale, alternative, chicken production systems are gaining popularity globally. However, this brings public health and market confidence concerns, especially where there are no established standards of production. The aim of this study was to carry out a microbiological analysis of chicken carcasses from the commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems, slaughtered in the same slaughterhouse. Methodology: Samples of 102 chicken carcasses were taken in two steps of the slaughter (A: after bleeding; and B: after chiller tank) and were subjected to aerobic mesophilic, coliforms at 35 °C and coliforms at 45 °C counts, and Salmonella spp. detection. Salmonella spp. isolates were subjected to antimicrobial resistance analysis. Results: At slaughter step A, carcasses from the backyard system had less contamination than carcasses from the commercial system, with a difference of 0.7 log10 CFU/mL. Salmonella was identified in carcasses of all production systems and in both slaughter steps. Nine chicken carcasses were positive for Salmonella and no significant difference was observed in the occurrence of Salmonella amongst the carcasses from different production systems. Two Salmonella isolates, that presented the highest resistance profiles (one isolate was resistant to eight and the other to six out of ten tested antibiotics), were identified on carcasses from the semi-backyard system. Conclusions: Carcasses from the backyard system had a lower microbial count at the initial step of the slaughter process than the commercial production system. In addition, greater resistance to antimicrobials was observed in Salmonella isolates from semi-backyard system.
id UNSP_52e3c02de260dd5842763f6f3c88856c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223358
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systemsBroilersCarcass qualityFree rangeMicrobiologySalmonellaIntroduction: Smaller scale, alternative, chicken production systems are gaining popularity globally. However, this brings public health and market confidence concerns, especially where there are no established standards of production. The aim of this study was to carry out a microbiological analysis of chicken carcasses from the commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems, slaughtered in the same slaughterhouse. Methodology: Samples of 102 chicken carcasses were taken in two steps of the slaughter (A: after bleeding; and B: after chiller tank) and were subjected to aerobic mesophilic, coliforms at 35 °C and coliforms at 45 °C counts, and Salmonella spp. detection. Salmonella spp. isolates were subjected to antimicrobial resistance analysis. Results: At slaughter step A, carcasses from the backyard system had less contamination than carcasses from the commercial system, with a difference of 0.7 log10 CFU/mL. Salmonella was identified in carcasses of all production systems and in both slaughter steps. Nine chicken carcasses were positive for Salmonella and no significant difference was observed in the occurrence of Salmonella amongst the carcasses from different production systems. Two Salmonella isolates, that presented the highest resistance profiles (one isolate was resistant to eight and the other to six out of ten tested antibiotics), were identified on carcasses from the semi-backyard system. Conclusions: Carcasses from the backyard system had a lower microbial count at the initial step of the slaughter process than the commercial production system. In addition, greater resistance to antimicrobials was observed in Salmonella isolates from semi-backyard system.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Uberlândia Umuarama CampusSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – UNESP Botucatu CampusSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – UNESP Botucatu CampusUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Garcia, Débora TamanahaNascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP]da Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP]Moura, Amanda OliveiraCosta, Priscila Cristinado Amaral, Alexandre BicalhoPeres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martinsde Fátima Carrijo, KêniaCossi, Marcus Vinícius2022-04-28T19:50:11Z2022-04-28T19:50:11Z2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1891-1898http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14882Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1891-1898, 2021.1972-26802036-6590http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22335810.3855/jidc.148822-s2.0-85123657454Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Infection in Developing Countriesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:50:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223358Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:55:00.935588Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
title Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
spellingShingle Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
Garcia, Débora Tamanaha
Broilers
Carcass quality
Free range
Microbiology
Salmonella
title_short Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
title_full Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
title_fullStr Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
title_sort Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems
author Garcia, Débora Tamanaha
author_facet Garcia, Débora Tamanaha
Nascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP]
da Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP]
Moura, Amanda Oliveira
Costa, Priscila Cristina
do Amaral, Alexandre Bicalho
Peres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martins
de Fátima Carrijo, Kênia
Cossi, Marcus Vinícius
author_role author
author2 Nascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP]
da Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP]
Moura, Amanda Oliveira
Costa, Priscila Cristina
do Amaral, Alexandre Bicalho
Peres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martins
de Fátima Carrijo, Kênia
Cossi, Marcus Vinícius
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia, Débora Tamanaha
Nascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP]
da Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP]
Moura, Amanda Oliveira
Costa, Priscila Cristina
do Amaral, Alexandre Bicalho
Peres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martins
de Fátima Carrijo, Kênia
Cossi, Marcus Vinícius
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broilers
Carcass quality
Free range
Microbiology
Salmonella
topic Broilers
Carcass quality
Free range
Microbiology
Salmonella
description Introduction: Smaller scale, alternative, chicken production systems are gaining popularity globally. However, this brings public health and market confidence concerns, especially where there are no established standards of production. The aim of this study was to carry out a microbiological analysis of chicken carcasses from the commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems, slaughtered in the same slaughterhouse. Methodology: Samples of 102 chicken carcasses were taken in two steps of the slaughter (A: after bleeding; and B: after chiller tank) and were subjected to aerobic mesophilic, coliforms at 35 °C and coliforms at 45 °C counts, and Salmonella spp. detection. Salmonella spp. isolates were subjected to antimicrobial resistance analysis. Results: At slaughter step A, carcasses from the backyard system had less contamination than carcasses from the commercial system, with a difference of 0.7 log10 CFU/mL. Salmonella was identified in carcasses of all production systems and in both slaughter steps. Nine chicken carcasses were positive for Salmonella and no significant difference was observed in the occurrence of Salmonella amongst the carcasses from different production systems. Two Salmonella isolates, that presented the highest resistance profiles (one isolate was resistant to eight and the other to six out of ten tested antibiotics), were identified on carcasses from the semi-backyard system. Conclusions: Carcasses from the backyard system had a lower microbial count at the initial step of the slaughter process than the commercial production system. In addition, greater resistance to antimicrobials was observed in Salmonella isolates from semi-backyard system.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
2022-04-28T19:50:11Z
2022-04-28T19:50:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14882
Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1891-1898, 2021.
1972-2680
2036-6590
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223358
10.3855/jidc.14882
2-s2.0-85123657454
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14882
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223358
identifier_str_mv Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1891-1898, 2021.
1972-2680
2036-6590
10.3855/jidc.14882
2-s2.0-85123657454
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1891-1898
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129262692073472