Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Giometti, Ines Cristina, Ozaki, Guilherme Akio Tamura, Garcia, Thiago Alves, Ueno, Melise Jacon Peres [UNESP], Fernandes, Fernanda [UNESP], Dornelles, Rita Cássia Menegati [UNESP], Louzada, Mario Jefferson Quirino, Filho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP], Belangero, William Dias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207843
Resumo: Introduction: The use of growth hormone (GH) in several sports has also been observed, becoming a problem for antidoping control agencies in the high-performance sports environment. In addition, the use of this substance may pose a risk, expose users to potential health problems and bone alterations. Objective: The objective of the present study was to verify the effects of muscular strength training and application of a GH protocol on mineral density, bone strength, and trabecular tissue. Methods: 40 Wistar rats, 60 days old, were used. The animals were divided into four groups: control (C), control and application of GH (GHC), muscular strength training (T), and muscular strength training with the application of GH (GHT). Animals of the GHC and GHT groups received administration of 0.2 IU/kg of GH prior to perform the T protocol. The animals of the T and GHT groups performed four series of 10 jumps, 3×/week, for 4/weeks. The values of bone mineral density (BMD), bone strength (F-max), and Micro Computed Tomography (MCT) were obtained. Results: An increase in the BMD variable was observed in all experimental groups (C = 0.110 ± 0.005; GHC = 0.134 ± 0.05; T = 0.127 ± 0.004; GHT = 0.133 ± 0.008 g/cm2) (C vs GHT p < 0.05). No statistical difference was observed for the F-max variable. For MCT, all experimental groups presented an increase in the number of trabeculae (Tb.N) (C = 1.10 ± 0.22; GHC = 1.79 ± 0.07; T = 1.91 ± 0.04; GHT = 1.91 ± 0.09) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that both GH and T were able to promote increases in BMD and Tb.N; however, no significant difference was observed for the F-max.
id UNSP_5309b268bb70a20d8a82ef6583eb3eef
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207843
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar ratsAnabolicsBone mineral densityBone strengthMicrostructure trabecularPhysical trainingIntroduction: The use of growth hormone (GH) in several sports has also been observed, becoming a problem for antidoping control agencies in the high-performance sports environment. In addition, the use of this substance may pose a risk, expose users to potential health problems and bone alterations. Objective: The objective of the present study was to verify the effects of muscular strength training and application of a GH protocol on mineral density, bone strength, and trabecular tissue. Methods: 40 Wistar rats, 60 days old, were used. The animals were divided into four groups: control (C), control and application of GH (GHC), muscular strength training (T), and muscular strength training with the application of GH (GHT). Animals of the GHC and GHT groups received administration of 0.2 IU/kg of GH prior to perform the T protocol. The animals of the T and GHT groups performed four series of 10 jumps, 3×/week, for 4/weeks. The values of bone mineral density (BMD), bone strength (F-max), and Micro Computed Tomography (MCT) were obtained. Results: An increase in the BMD variable was observed in all experimental groups (C = 0.110 ± 0.005; GHC = 0.134 ± 0.05; T = 0.127 ± 0.004; GHT = 0.133 ± 0.008 g/cm2) (C vs GHT p < 0.05). No statistical difference was observed for the F-max variable. For MCT, all experimental groups presented an increase in the number of trabeculae (Tb.N) (C = 1.10 ± 0.22; GHC = 1.79 ± 0.07; T = 1.91 ± 0.04; GHT = 1.91 ± 0.09) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that both GH and T were able to promote increases in BMD and Tb.N; however, no significant difference was observed for the F-max.Department of Physical Therapy Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPDepartment Orthopedic and Traumatology Universidade Estadual de Campinas UNICAMPFaculty of Veterinary Medicine Universidade do Oeste Paulista UNOESTEDepartment of Animal Support Production and Health Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPDepartment of Basic Sciences Araçatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPCatholic Salesian Auxilium University CentreLaboratório de Análise da Plasticidade Muscular LAPMUS UNESP/FCT Campus de Presidente Prudente, Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305, Bairro: Centro EducacionalDepartment of Physical Therapy Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPDepartment of Animal Support Production and Health Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPDepartment of Basic Sciences Araçatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESPLaboratório de Análise da Plasticidade Muscular LAPMUS UNESP/FCT Campus de Presidente Prudente, Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305, Bairro: Centro EducacionalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)UNOESTECatholic Salesian Auxilium University CentreCastoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]Giometti, Ines CristinaOzaki, Guilherme Akio TamuraGarcia, Thiago AlvesUeno, Melise Jacon Peres [UNESP]Fernandes, Fernanda [UNESP]Dornelles, Rita Cássia Menegati [UNESP]Louzada, Mario Jefferson QuirinoFilho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP]Belangero, William Dias2021-06-25T11:01:57Z2021-06-25T11:01:57Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1Sport Sciences for Health.1825-12341824-7490http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20784310.1007/s11332-021-00784-12-s2.0-85107465288Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSport Sciences for Healthinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:02:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207843Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:02:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
title Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
spellingShingle Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
Castoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]
Anabolics
Bone mineral density
Bone strength
Microstructure trabecular
Physical training
title_short Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
title_full Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
title_fullStr Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
title_full_unstemmed Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
title_sort Strength training and growth hormone: effects on bone of Wistar rats
author Castoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]
author_facet Castoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]
Giometti, Ines Cristina
Ozaki, Guilherme Akio Tamura
Garcia, Thiago Alves
Ueno, Melise Jacon Peres [UNESP]
Fernandes, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dornelles, Rita Cássia Menegati [UNESP]
Louzada, Mario Jefferson Quirino
Filho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP]
Belangero, William Dias
author_role author
author2 Giometti, Ines Cristina
Ozaki, Guilherme Akio Tamura
Garcia, Thiago Alves
Ueno, Melise Jacon Peres [UNESP]
Fernandes, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dornelles, Rita Cássia Menegati [UNESP]
Louzada, Mario Jefferson Quirino
Filho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP]
Belangero, William Dias
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
UNOESTE
Catholic Salesian Auxilium University Centre
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castoldi, Robson Chacon [UNESP]
Giometti, Ines Cristina
Ozaki, Guilherme Akio Tamura
Garcia, Thiago Alves
Ueno, Melise Jacon Peres [UNESP]
Fernandes, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dornelles, Rita Cássia Menegati [UNESP]
Louzada, Mario Jefferson Quirino
Filho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP]
Belangero, William Dias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anabolics
Bone mineral density
Bone strength
Microstructure trabecular
Physical training
topic Anabolics
Bone mineral density
Bone strength
Microstructure trabecular
Physical training
description Introduction: The use of growth hormone (GH) in several sports has also been observed, becoming a problem for antidoping control agencies in the high-performance sports environment. In addition, the use of this substance may pose a risk, expose users to potential health problems and bone alterations. Objective: The objective of the present study was to verify the effects of muscular strength training and application of a GH protocol on mineral density, bone strength, and trabecular tissue. Methods: 40 Wistar rats, 60 days old, were used. The animals were divided into four groups: control (C), control and application of GH (GHC), muscular strength training (T), and muscular strength training with the application of GH (GHT). Animals of the GHC and GHT groups received administration of 0.2 IU/kg of GH prior to perform the T protocol. The animals of the T and GHT groups performed four series of 10 jumps, 3×/week, for 4/weeks. The values of bone mineral density (BMD), bone strength (F-max), and Micro Computed Tomography (MCT) were obtained. Results: An increase in the BMD variable was observed in all experimental groups (C = 0.110 ± 0.005; GHC = 0.134 ± 0.05; T = 0.127 ± 0.004; GHT = 0.133 ± 0.008 g/cm2) (C vs GHT p < 0.05). No statistical difference was observed for the F-max variable. For MCT, all experimental groups presented an increase in the number of trabeculae (Tb.N) (C = 1.10 ± 0.22; GHC = 1.79 ± 0.07; T = 1.91 ± 0.04; GHT = 1.91 ± 0.09) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that both GH and T were able to promote increases in BMD and Tb.N; however, no significant difference was observed for the F-max.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:01:57Z
2021-06-25T11:01:57Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1
Sport Sciences for Health.
1825-1234
1824-7490
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207843
10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1
2-s2.0-85107465288
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207843
identifier_str_mv Sport Sciences for Health.
1825-1234
1824-7490
10.1007/s11332-021-00784-1
2-s2.0-85107465288
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sport Sciences for Health
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546444706021376