Análise do plano de conservação do uso do entorno do reservatório da usina hidrelétrica de Ilha Solteira, SP: a inclusão da biodiversidade

• Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Mirella
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/217280
• topic: Environmental Studies; Biodiversity checklist; Estudos ambientais; Lista de verificação da biodiversidade; PACUERA

Established in the Brazilian environmental legislation in 1986, the carrying out of environmental studies in anticipation of the installation of potentially degrading projects from an environmental point of view, such as hydroelectric plants, was not applied in the country in several situations, such as for the Hydroelectric Plant of Ilha Solteira built in 1965. For these cases, they are environmental studies called “Environmental Plan for the Conservation and Use of the Surroundings of the Artificial Reservoir” or PACUERA. The objective of this work was to expose how biodiversity was inserted in the PACUERA Hydroelectric Development of Ilha Solteira, its potential weaknesses and strengths, in order to contribute to the improvement of its quality, according to an adaptation of the "Checklist for analysis the inclusion of biodiversity in Environmental Impact Studies”, elaborated by Mandai (2019). This list presents eight analysis categories referring to the procedures present in EIAs / RIMAs, but which will be adapted to PACUERAs, where there are four of the original categories, namely: "Environmental diagnosis of the biological environment, at an ecosystem and specific level", "Environmental impacts ”,“ Methods for identification and analysis of environmental impacts ”,“ Mitigation and compensation of environmental impacts ”and“ Monitoring ”. Each Category presents indicators, in the form of questions, for the analysis of environmental studies. With an analysis of PACUERA in the environmental diagnosis criteria, specific level and impacts at the ecosystem level, considering the indicators or analysis criteria, that is, the study identified information omissions in general, poor definition of the scope of studies, neglected alternatives , lack of adequate technical procedures to identify and predict impacts, in addition to the lack of quality of the study according to Mandai's list.