Welding strength of NiTi wires
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires. |
id |
UNSP_571eea20bed31b5767f0a9c072201f6a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158227 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Welding strength of NiTi wiresWeldingOrthodontic wireTensile strengthSoldaFio ortodônticoResistência à rupturaABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires.RESUMOObjetivo:identificar a potência mais adequada para solda elétrica em três marcas comerciais de fios de níquel-titânio (NiTi).Métodos: noventa pares de fios ortodônticos de NiTi, de dimensões 0,018” e 0,017” × 0,025’’, foram soldados por resistência elétrica e distribuídos em três grupos: GI (Orthometric, Marília, São Paulo, Brasil), GII (3M, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brasil) e GIII (GAC, Yorque, Pensilvânia, Estados Unidos). Cada grupo foi dividido em subgrupos de cinco pares de fios soldados com diferentes níveis de potência. Nos GI e GII, os fios foram soldados com níveis de potência de 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 e 5; enquanto no GIII as potências utilizadas foram de 2.5, 3, 3.5 e 4. Os pares de fios foram submetidos a um teste de tração até sua ruptura, com registro das forças máximas. Análises de variância (ANOVA) e testes post-hoc foram realizados para determinar qual subgrupo, dentro de cada grupo, obteve a maior força de resistência.Resultados: a potência 2.5 exibiu a menor resistência à ruptura para todos os grupos (43,75 N para o GI; 28,41 N para o GII e 47,57 N para o GIII). A potência 4 mostrou maior resistência à ruptura nos GI e GII (97,90 N e 99,61 N, respectivamente), enquanto no GIII (79,28 N) foi a potência 3.5.Conclusões: os níveis de potência mais adequados variaram para as marcas comerciais, sendo identificados como 4 para Orthometric e 3M, e 3.5 para GAC.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Clínica InfantilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Clínica InfantilDental Press InternationalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Mesquita, Tatyane RibeiroMartins, Lídia ParsekianMartins, Renato Parsekian2018-11-12T17:28:55Z2018-11-12T17:28:55Z2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article58-62application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oarDental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018.2176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15822710.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oarS2176-94512018000310008S2176-94512018000310008.pdf8223795731605246SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodontics0,489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T14:22:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158227Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T14:22:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Welding strength of NiTi wires |
title |
Welding strength of NiTi wires |
spellingShingle |
Welding strength of NiTi wires Welding strength of NiTi wires Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro Welding Orthodontic wire Tensile strength Solda Fio ortodôntico Resistência à ruptura Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro Welding Orthodontic wire Tensile strength Solda Fio ortodôntico Resistência à ruptura |
title_short |
Welding strength of NiTi wires |
title_full |
Welding strength of NiTi wires |
title_fullStr |
Welding strength of NiTi wires Welding strength of NiTi wires |
title_full_unstemmed |
Welding strength of NiTi wires Welding strength of NiTi wires |
title_sort |
Welding strength of NiTi wires |
author |
Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro Martins, Lídia Parsekian Martins, Renato Parsekian Martins, Lídia Parsekian Martins, Renato Parsekian |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Lídia Parsekian Martins, Renato Parsekian |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro Martins, Lídia Parsekian Martins, Renato Parsekian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Welding Orthodontic wire Tensile strength Solda Fio ortodôntico Resistência à ruptura |
topic |
Welding Orthodontic wire Tensile strength Solda Fio ortodôntico Resistência à ruptura |
description |
ABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-12T17:28:55Z 2018-11-12T17:28:55Z 2018-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018. 2176-9451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227 10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar S2176-94512018000310008 S2176-94512018000310008.pdf 8223795731605246 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018. 2176-9451 10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar S2176-94512018000310008 S2176-94512018000310008.pdf 8223795731605246 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 0,489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
58-62 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1822219166818500608 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar |