Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Pithon,Matheus Melo, Maciel,José Vinicius Bolognesi, Bolognese,Ana Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100012
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orthodontics) and polycarbonate bracket (American Orthodontics), ceramic bracket (American Orthodontics), and metal bracket (3M Unitek) with slots of 0.022x0.030-in were used. The friction coefficient was assessed by means of mechanical traction with the system immersed in artificial saliva. The mean roughness of both wire surface and bracket slots was evaluated by using a surface profilometer. RESULTS: The system using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket had the highest roughness (p<0.05). SS wire with ceramic bracket had the highest friction coefficient, whereas the use of metallic bracket yielded the lowest (p<0.05). However, it was observed a statistically significant difference in the system using TMA wire and ceramic bracket compared to that using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket (p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic brackets in association with SS wire should be judiciously used, since this system showed a high friction coefficient.
id USP-17_24e0ff99859e01eb3b2a685f539e7f0e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100012
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluationFrictionTensile strengthOrthodontic bracketsOrthodontic wiresTopographyOBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orthodontics) and polycarbonate bracket (American Orthodontics), ceramic bracket (American Orthodontics), and metal bracket (3M Unitek) with slots of 0.022x0.030-in were used. The friction coefficient was assessed by means of mechanical traction with the system immersed in artificial saliva. The mean roughness of both wire surface and bracket slots was evaluated by using a surface profilometer. RESULTS: The system using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket had the highest roughness (p<0.05). SS wire with ceramic bracket had the highest friction coefficient, whereas the use of metallic bracket yielded the lowest (p<0.05). However, it was observed a statistically significant difference in the system using TMA wire and ceramic bracket compared to that using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket (p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic brackets in association with SS wire should be judiciously used, since this system showed a high friction coefficient.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2011-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100012Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572011000100012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da SilvaPithon,Matheus MeloMaciel,José Vinicius BolognesiBolognese,Ana Mariaeng2011-03-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100012Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2011-03-14T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
title Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
spellingShingle Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
Fidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da Silva
Friction
Tensile strength
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Topography
title_short Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
title_full Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
title_sort Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation
author Fidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da Silva
author_facet Fidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da Silva
Pithon,Matheus Melo
Maciel,José Vinicius Bolognesi
Bolognese,Ana Maria
author_role author
author2 Pithon,Matheus Melo
Maciel,José Vinicius Bolognesi
Bolognese,Ana Maria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fidalgo,Tatiana Kelly da Silva
Pithon,Matheus Melo
Maciel,José Vinicius Bolognesi
Bolognese,Ana Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Friction
Tensile strength
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Topography
topic Friction
Tensile strength
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Topography
description OBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orthodontics) and polycarbonate bracket (American Orthodontics), ceramic bracket (American Orthodontics), and metal bracket (3M Unitek) with slots of 0.022x0.030-in were used. The friction coefficient was assessed by means of mechanical traction with the system immersed in artificial saliva. The mean roughness of both wire surface and bracket slots was evaluated by using a surface profilometer. RESULTS: The system using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket had the highest roughness (p<0.05). SS wire with ceramic bracket had the highest friction coefficient, whereas the use of metallic bracket yielded the lowest (p<0.05). However, it was observed a statistically significant difference in the system using TMA wire and ceramic bracket compared to that using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket (p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic brackets in association with SS wire should be judiciously used, since this system showed a high friction coefficient.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572011000100012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936436491485184