Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Shintome, L. K. [UNESP], Arana-Chavez, V. E., Fava, M. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219672
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of 5 adhesive systems to enamel, one single-bottle acid-etch adhesive (O), two self-etching primers (P) and two all-in-one self-etching adhesives (S). Method: Sixty premolar enamel surfaces (buccal or lingual) were ground flat with 400- and 600-grit SiC papers and randomly divided into 5 groups (n=12), according to the adhesive system: SB2 - Single Bond 2 (O); CSE - Clearfil SE Bond (P); ADS - AdheSE (P); PLP - Adper Prompt L-Pop (S); XE3 - Xeno III (S). Tygon tubing (inner diameter of 0.8mm) restricted the bonding area to obtain the resin composite (Z250) cylinders. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24h and thermocycling, micro-shear testing was performed (crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min). Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (a=5%). Samples were also subjected to stereomicroscopic and SEM evaluations after micro-shear testing. Mean bond strength values (MPa±SD) and the results of Tukey test were: SB2: 36.36(±3.34)a; ADS: 33.03(±7.83)a; XE3: 32.76(±5.61)a; CSE: 30.61(±6.68)a; PLP: 22.17(±6.05)b. Groups with the same letter were not statistically different. It can be concluded that no significant difference was there between SB2, ADS, XE3 and CSE, in spite of different etching patterns of these adhesives. Only PLP presented statistically lower bond strengths compared with others.
id UNSP_588b633ba6279da76d91e721588cf07f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219672
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamelThe aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of 5 adhesive systems to enamel, one single-bottle acid-etch adhesive (O), two self-etching primers (P) and two all-in-one self-etching adhesives (S). Method: Sixty premolar enamel surfaces (buccal or lingual) were ground flat with 400- and 600-grit SiC papers and randomly divided into 5 groups (n=12), according to the adhesive system: SB2 - Single Bond 2 (O); CSE - Clearfil SE Bond (P); ADS - AdheSE (P); PLP - Adper Prompt L-Pop (S); XE3 - Xeno III (S). Tygon tubing (inner diameter of 0.8mm) restricted the bonding area to obtain the resin composite (Z250) cylinders. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24h and thermocycling, micro-shear testing was performed (crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min). Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (a=5%). Samples were also subjected to stereomicroscopic and SEM evaluations after micro-shear testing. Mean bond strength values (MPa±SD) and the results of Tukey test were: SB2: 36.36(±3.34)a; ADS: 33.03(±7.83)a; XE3: 32.76(±5.61)a; CSE: 30.61(±6.68)a; PLP: 22.17(±6.05)b. Groups with the same letter were not statistically different. It can be concluded that no significant difference was there between SB2, ADS, XE3 and CSE, in spite of different etching patterns of these adhesives. Only PLP presented statistically lower bond strengths compared with others.School of Dentistry of São José Dos Campos UNESP, Sã o José dos Campos, SPDivision of Oral Biology School of Dentistry University of Sã O Paulo, São Paulo, SPSchool of Dentistry of São José Dos Campos UNESP, Sã o José dos Campos, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of Sã O PauloNagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]Shintome, L. K. [UNESP]Arana-Chavez, V. E.Fava, M. [UNESP]2022-04-28T18:56:51Z2022-04-28T18:56:51Z2011-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article301-304http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 35, n. 3, p. 301-304, 2011.1053-4628http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21967210.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t72-s2.0-79959431082Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:56:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219672Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T18:56:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
title Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
spellingShingle Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
Nagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]
title_short Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
title_full Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
title_fullStr Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
title_full_unstemmed Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
title_sort Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel
author Nagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]
author_facet Nagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]
Shintome, L. K. [UNESP]
Arana-Chavez, V. E.
Fava, M. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Shintome, L. K. [UNESP]
Arana-Chavez, V. E.
Fava, M. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Sã O Paulo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nagayassu, M. P. [UNESP]
Shintome, L. K. [UNESP]
Arana-Chavez, V. E.
Fava, M. [UNESP]
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of 5 adhesive systems to enamel, one single-bottle acid-etch adhesive (O), two self-etching primers (P) and two all-in-one self-etching adhesives (S). Method: Sixty premolar enamel surfaces (buccal or lingual) were ground flat with 400- and 600-grit SiC papers and randomly divided into 5 groups (n=12), according to the adhesive system: SB2 - Single Bond 2 (O); CSE - Clearfil SE Bond (P); ADS - AdheSE (P); PLP - Adper Prompt L-Pop (S); XE3 - Xeno III (S). Tygon tubing (inner diameter of 0.8mm) restricted the bonding area to obtain the resin composite (Z250) cylinders. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24h and thermocycling, micro-shear testing was performed (crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min). Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (a=5%). Samples were also subjected to stereomicroscopic and SEM evaluations after micro-shear testing. Mean bond strength values (MPa±SD) and the results of Tukey test were: SB2: 36.36(±3.34)a; ADS: 33.03(±7.83)a; XE3: 32.76(±5.61)a; CSE: 30.61(±6.68)a; PLP: 22.17(±6.05)b. Groups with the same letter were not statistically different. It can be concluded that no significant difference was there between SB2, ADS, XE3 and CSE, in spite of different etching patterns of these adhesives. Only PLP presented statistically lower bond strengths compared with others.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-04-01
2022-04-28T18:56:51Z
2022-04-28T18:56:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 35, n. 3, p. 301-304, 2011.
1053-4628
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219672
10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7
2-s2.0-79959431082
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219672
identifier_str_mv Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 35, n. 3, p. 301-304, 2011.
1053-4628
10.17796/jcpd.35.3.rr23x767505n22t7
2-s2.0-79959431082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 301-304
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046246755074048