Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lippolis, K. D.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cooke, R. F. [UNESP], Schubach, K. M., Brandao, A. P. [UNESP], Silva, L. G. T. da [UNESP], Marques, R. S., Bohnert, D. W.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0673
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180775
Resumo: Ninety Angus × Hereford calves were ranked by sex, BW, and age and assigned to 1 of 3 vaccination schemes against the bovine respiratory disease complex: 1) vaccination at weaning (d 0) and a booster at feedlot entry (d 30; CON; n = 30), 2) vaccination 15 d before weaning (d −15) and a booster 15 d before feedlot entry (d 15; EARLY; n = 30), and 3) vaccination 15 d after weaning (d 15) and a booster 15 d after feedlot entry (d 45; DELAYED; n = 30). From d −15 to 7, calves were maintained as a single group on pasture. On d 8, calves were placed into 1 of 18 drylot pens (6 pens/treatment; 5 calves/pen) and fed alfalfa–triticale hay. On d 29, calves were transported 1,440 km in a livestock trailer and unloaded on d 30 at the same feed yard with the same pen arrangement used prior to transport. From d 30 to 75, calves were fed a receiving diet based on alfalfa–triticale hay + corn-based concentrate. Calf BW was recorded on 2 consecutive days (d −15, −14, 0, 1, 28, 29, 75, and 76). Blood samples were collected on d −15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75. The EARLY calves had less (P ≤ 0.09) ADG before weaning (d −15 to −1); however, they had greater (P ≤ 0.01) ADG during feedlot receiving (d 30 to 75) compared with calves with the other treatments. During preconditioning (d 0 to 29), CON calves had greater (P ≤ 0.04) DMI compared with EARLY and DELAYED calves. During feedlot receiving, no treatment differences were detected (P ≥ 0.17) for hay or concentrate DMI, G:F, and morbidity and mortality rates. There were no treatment effects on calf BW at weaning and at the end of the preconditioning or receiving periods (P ≥ 0.65). Plasma concentrations of antibodies against Mannheimia haemolytica were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 0, greater (P ≤ 0.04) for CON calves than for EARLY and DELAYED calves on d 15, greater (P ≤ 0.02) in DELAYED and EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 30, and greater (P = 0.03) in EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 75. Plasma concentrations of antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea viruses were greater (P ≤ 0.04) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 15 and greater for EARLY and CON calves than for DELAYED calves on d 30 and 45. Collectively, EARLY calves had greater plasma concentrations of antibodies against the evaluated pathogens at feedlot entry and increased ADG during receiving compared with their CON and DELAYED cohorts. Hence, anticipating initial and booster vaccinations against respiratory pathogens to provide both doses prior to feedlot entry appears to be a valid strategy to enhance cattle health and performance during feedlot receiving.
id UNSP_589c85bc941fae9634398f24a2b0938c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180775
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattleFeeder cattleHealthPerformanceRespiratory diseasesVaccinationNinety Angus × Hereford calves were ranked by sex, BW, and age and assigned to 1 of 3 vaccination schemes against the bovine respiratory disease complex: 1) vaccination at weaning (d 0) and a booster at feedlot entry (d 30; CON; n = 30), 2) vaccination 15 d before weaning (d −15) and a booster 15 d before feedlot entry (d 15; EARLY; n = 30), and 3) vaccination 15 d after weaning (d 15) and a booster 15 d after feedlot entry (d 45; DELAYED; n = 30). From d −15 to 7, calves were maintained as a single group on pasture. On d 8, calves were placed into 1 of 18 drylot pens (6 pens/treatment; 5 calves/pen) and fed alfalfa–triticale hay. On d 29, calves were transported 1,440 km in a livestock trailer and unloaded on d 30 at the same feed yard with the same pen arrangement used prior to transport. From d 30 to 75, calves were fed a receiving diet based on alfalfa–triticale hay + corn-based concentrate. Calf BW was recorded on 2 consecutive days (d −15, −14, 0, 1, 28, 29, 75, and 76). Blood samples were collected on d −15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75. The EARLY calves had less (P ≤ 0.09) ADG before weaning (d −15 to −1); however, they had greater (P ≤ 0.01) ADG during feedlot receiving (d 30 to 75) compared with calves with the other treatments. During preconditioning (d 0 to 29), CON calves had greater (P ≤ 0.04) DMI compared with EARLY and DELAYED calves. During feedlot receiving, no treatment differences were detected (P ≥ 0.17) for hay or concentrate DMI, G:F, and morbidity and mortality rates. There were no treatment effects on calf BW at weaning and at the end of the preconditioning or receiving periods (P ≥ 0.65). Plasma concentrations of antibodies against Mannheimia haemolytica were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 0, greater (P ≤ 0.04) for CON calves than for EARLY and DELAYED calves on d 15, greater (P ≤ 0.02) in DELAYED and EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 30, and greater (P = 0.03) in EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 75. Plasma concentrations of antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea viruses were greater (P ≤ 0.04) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 15 and greater for EARLY and CON calves than for DELAYED calves on d 30 and 45. Collectively, EARLY calves had greater plasma concentrations of antibodies against the evaluated pathogens at feedlot entry and increased ADG during receiving compared with their CON and DELAYED cohorts. Hence, anticipating initial and booster vaccinations against respiratory pathogens to provide both doses prior to feedlot entry appears to be a valid strategy to enhance cattle health and performance during feedlot receiving.USDA-NIFA OregonOregon State University Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research CenterUNESP Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia UNESP - Univ. Estadual PaulistaUNESP Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia UNESP - Univ. Estadual PaulistaUSDA-NIFA Oregon: ORE00142Amer Soc Animal ScienceEastern Oregon Agricultural Research CenterUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Lippolis, K. D.Cooke, R. F. [UNESP]Schubach, K. M.Brandao, A. P. [UNESP]Silva, L. G. T. da [UNESP]Marques, R. S.Bohnert, D. W.2018-12-11T16:44:00Z2018-11-26T15:37:27Z2018-12-11T16:44:00Z2018-11-26T15:37:27Z2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3987-3995application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0673Journal of Animal Science, v. 94, n. 9, p. 3987-3995, 2016.1525-31630021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18077510.2527/jas.2016-0673WOS:0003886386000372-s2.0-84991051938ScopusWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Animal Science0,848info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-25T06:17:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180775Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-25T06:17:37Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
title Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
spellingShingle Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
Lippolis, K. D.
Feeder cattle
Health
Performance
Respiratory diseases
Vaccination
title_short Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
title_full Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
title_fullStr Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
title_full_unstemmed Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
title_sort Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance antibody response and performance of feeder cattle
author Lippolis, K. D.
author_facet Lippolis, K. D.
Cooke, R. F. [UNESP]
Schubach, K. M.
Brandao, A. P. [UNESP]
Silva, L. G. T. da [UNESP]
Marques, R. S.
Bohnert, D. W.
author_role author
author2 Cooke, R. F. [UNESP]
Schubach, K. M.
Brandao, A. P. [UNESP]
Silva, L. G. T. da [UNESP]
Marques, R. S.
Bohnert, D. W.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lippolis, K. D.
Cooke, R. F. [UNESP]
Schubach, K. M.
Brandao, A. P. [UNESP]
Silva, L. G. T. da [UNESP]
Marques, R. S.
Bohnert, D. W.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Feeder cattle
Health
Performance
Respiratory diseases
Vaccination
topic Feeder cattle
Health
Performance
Respiratory diseases
Vaccination
description Ninety Angus × Hereford calves were ranked by sex, BW, and age and assigned to 1 of 3 vaccination schemes against the bovine respiratory disease complex: 1) vaccination at weaning (d 0) and a booster at feedlot entry (d 30; CON; n = 30), 2) vaccination 15 d before weaning (d −15) and a booster 15 d before feedlot entry (d 15; EARLY; n = 30), and 3) vaccination 15 d after weaning (d 15) and a booster 15 d after feedlot entry (d 45; DELAYED; n = 30). From d −15 to 7, calves were maintained as a single group on pasture. On d 8, calves were placed into 1 of 18 drylot pens (6 pens/treatment; 5 calves/pen) and fed alfalfa–triticale hay. On d 29, calves were transported 1,440 km in a livestock trailer and unloaded on d 30 at the same feed yard with the same pen arrangement used prior to transport. From d 30 to 75, calves were fed a receiving diet based on alfalfa–triticale hay + corn-based concentrate. Calf BW was recorded on 2 consecutive days (d −15, −14, 0, 1, 28, 29, 75, and 76). Blood samples were collected on d −15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75. The EARLY calves had less (P ≤ 0.09) ADG before weaning (d −15 to −1); however, they had greater (P ≤ 0.01) ADG during feedlot receiving (d 30 to 75) compared with calves with the other treatments. During preconditioning (d 0 to 29), CON calves had greater (P ≤ 0.04) DMI compared with EARLY and DELAYED calves. During feedlot receiving, no treatment differences were detected (P ≥ 0.17) for hay or concentrate DMI, G:F, and morbidity and mortality rates. There were no treatment effects on calf BW at weaning and at the end of the preconditioning or receiving periods (P ≥ 0.65). Plasma concentrations of antibodies against Mannheimia haemolytica were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 0, greater (P ≤ 0.04) for CON calves than for EARLY and DELAYED calves on d 15, greater (P ≤ 0.02) in DELAYED and EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 30, and greater (P = 0.03) in EARLY calves than in CON calves on d 75. Plasma concentrations of antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea viruses were greater (P ≤ 0.04) in EARLY calves than in CON and DELAYED calves on d 15 and greater for EARLY and CON calves than for DELAYED calves on d 30 and 45. Collectively, EARLY calves had greater plasma concentrations of antibodies against the evaluated pathogens at feedlot entry and increased ADG during receiving compared with their CON and DELAYED cohorts. Hence, anticipating initial and booster vaccinations against respiratory pathogens to provide both doses prior to feedlot entry appears to be a valid strategy to enhance cattle health and performance during feedlot receiving.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
2018-12-11T16:44:00Z
2018-11-26T15:37:27Z
2018-12-11T16:44:00Z
2018-11-26T15:37:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0673
Journal of Animal Science, v. 94, n. 9, p. 3987-3995, 2016.
1525-3163
0021-8812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180775
10.2527/jas.2016-0673
WOS:000388638600037
2-s2.0-84991051938
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0673
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180775
identifier_str_mv Journal of Animal Science, v. 94, n. 9, p. 3987-3995, 2016.
1525-3163
0021-8812
10.2527/jas.2016-0673
WOS:000388638600037
2-s2.0-84991051938
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Science
0,848
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 3987-3995
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Animal Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Animal Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965067953831936